The Hindenburg Line of the Strauss wars

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):118-153 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bringing continental sensibilities and skill to his project, David Janssens has abandoned the line of defense heretofore used by North American intellectuals to shield Leo Strauss from criticism: Janssens wastes no time trying to prove Strauss was a liberal democrat, frankly admits his atheism, and emphasizes the continuity and European origins of his thought. Nevertheless committed to defending Strauss even at his most vulnerable points, Janssens is compelled to anchor his new defensive position on a misreading of what he calls "an inconspicuous footnote" in Philosophie und Gesetz (1935)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-13

Downloads
118 (#399,984)

6 months
5 (#1,609,967)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William H.F. Altman
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (Alumnus)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
S. - 2008 - In Michael Inwood, A Hegel Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 262-287.
Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty.Carl Schmitt - 1985 - University Of Chicago Press. Edited by George Schwab.
Natural right and history.Leo Strauss - 1953 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.

View all 57 references / Add more references