- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
On the philosophical analysis of genetic essentialism: Commentary on: “The use of genetic test information in insurance: The argument from indistinguishability reconsidered”
Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):311-314 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Commentary on “distinguishing genetic from nongenetic medical tests: Some implications for antidiscrimination legislation” (j. S. Alper and J. beckwith). [REVIEW]Robert Mullan Cook-Deegan - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):151-154.
The use of genetic test information in insurance: The argument from indistinguishability reconsidered. [REVIEW]Dr V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
The use of genetic test information in insurance: The argument from indistinguishability reconsidered.V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
Distinguishing genetic from nongenetic medical tests: Some implications for antidiscrimination legislation.Joseph Alper & Jon Beckwith - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):141-150.
Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: A case study analysis. [REVIEW]Lisa N. Geller, Joseph S. Alper, Paul R. Billings, Carol I. Barash, Jonathan Beckwith & Marvin R. Natowicz - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):71-88.
Genetic testing and insurance: When is discrimination justified?David Keays - 2000 - Monash Bioethics Review 19 (4):S79-S88.
Unjustified Discrimination: Is the Moratorium on the use of Genetic Test Results by Insurers a Contradiction in Terms? [REVIEW]Ruth Wilkinson - 2010 - Health Care Analysis 18 (3):279-293.
Genetic discrimination: transatlantic perspectives on the case for a European-level legal response.Gerard Quinn, Aisling De Paor & Peter David Blanck (eds.) - 2015 - New York, NY: Routledge.
Can Genetic Nondiscrimination Laws Save Lives?Mark A. Rothstein - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 51 (1):6-7.
Is genetic information relevantly different from other kinds of non-genetic information in the life insurance context?P. J. Malpas - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (7):548-551.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
130 (#346,596)
6 months
9 (#1,204,121)
2009-01-28
Downloads
130 (#346,596)
6 months
9 (#1,204,121)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Reconsidering Genetic Antidiscrimination Legislation.Jon Beckwith & Joseph S. Alper - 1998 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (3):205-210.
Distinguishing genetic from nongenetic medical tests: Some implications for antidiscrimination legislation.Joseph Alper & Jon Beckwith - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):141-150.
The use of genetic test information in insurance: The argument from indistinguishability reconsidered.V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
The use of genetic test information in insurance: The argument from indistinguishability reconsidered. [REVIEW]Dr V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation