Reply to the comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):182 – 194 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this discussion I respond to some of the criticisms raised by Béatrice Longuenesse and Hannah Ginsborg to my account of Kant's aesthetic theory presents in Kant's Theory of Taste.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

One Act or Two? Hannah Ginsborg on Aesthetic Judgement.Paul Guyer - 2017 - British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (4):407-419.
The Normativity Objection.Patricia Kitcher - 2011 - In Kant's thinker. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 217-237.
Kant and Hegel on freedom: Two new interpretations.Karl Ameriks - 1992 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):219 – 232.
Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment (review).Paul Guyer - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (3):406-408.
Kant’s Theory of Concept Formation and his Theory of Definitions.Matthew McAndrew - 2023 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105 (4):591-619.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
180 (#225,921)

6 months
12 (#966,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Henry E. Allison
University of California, San Diego

References found in this work

Add more references