Islamic Ethics and AI: An Evaluation of Existing Approaches to AI using Trusteeship Ethics

Philosophy and Technology 38 (3):1-34 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are revolutionising key sectors such as healthcare, finance, and governance, while raising ethical challenges, including algorithmic bias, privacy violations, and environmental sustainability. Dominant Western ethical paradigms, such as Luciano Floridi’s Information Ethics, emphasise procedural integrity and transparency but often lack spiritual and metaphysical grounding prevalent in global traditions. Most approaches to Islamic ethics for AI have employed Maqasid al-Shariah (objectives of Islamic law) and Qawaid Fiqhiyya (legal maxims), that apply legal principles to ethical questions but face limitations in addressing the complexities of emerging technologies especially that they, initially, were developed to address problems in Islamic law and not in Ethics. This paper introduces the prospects of Taha Abdurrahman’s I’timāni (trusteeship) framework as a unified ethical model for AI technologies. Rooted in the concept of divine trust (amana), the framework integrates three foundational covenants—Ontological, Epistemological, and Existential—offering a comprehensive vision of human responsibility toward God, knowledge, and creation. This approach provides ways to prioritise moral accountability with actionable governance strategies, as we demonstrate its practical applicability. We show that from the Islamic perspective, a philosophy of ethics approach is not only more appropriate, but more promising and comprehensive than ones based on jurisprudential rulings, as combating the ethical concerns of data-driven AI in a neoliberal environment requires an overhaul in worldview with cross-cultural respect and care for all.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.Francisco Lara & Jan Deckers (eds.) - 2023 - Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Regulation and Governance of Artificial Intelligence.Tanvi Sneha Malhotra Manav Nitin Kapoor - 2025 - International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering (Ijareeie) 14 (2):500-505.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-08-15

Downloads
85 (#653,016)

6 months
60 (#151,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Jābirī’s Three Epistemes and Ṭāhā’s Three Levels of ʿAql.Mutamakin Mutamakin, Syarif Hidayatullah, Agus Himawan Utomo, Aris Fauzan & Zaedun Na'im - 2026 - Kanz Philosophia : A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 12 (1):53-78.
Animus Digitus.Suhermanto Ja'far & Kunawi Kunawi - 2026 - Kanz Philosophia : A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 12 (1):239-262.

Add more citations

References found in this work

S.Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1995-2243.
S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
The philosophy of information.Luciano Floridi - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The ethics of information.Luciano Floridi - 2015 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 16 references / Add more references