Phronesis, dialogue, and hope: a response to Nicholas Burbules

Ethics and Education 14 (2):138-142 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I agree with Nicholas Burbules that ‘Phronesis’ is an ethical and political category that grounds the possibility of intercultural communication in translation from one particular context to another rather than in the presumption of one or another account of universalism. After a brief review of the development of this idea in key milestones of Western philosophy, I argue that it requires an education in dialogue across difference that can foster hope for peaceful coexistence among diverse traditions and perspectives in diverse democratic societies.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Transcending and attending to difference in the multicultural classroom.Benjamin Endres - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 36 (2):171–185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-13

Downloads
114 (#420,050)

6 months
37 (#234,248)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Democracy and education : An introduction to the philosophy of education.John Dewey - 1916 - Mineola, N.Y.: Macmillan. Edited by Nicholas Tampio.
The Ethics of Authenticity.Charles Taylor - 1991 - Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press.
Critique of Practical Reason.Immanuel Kant (ed.) - 1788 - New York,: Hackett Publishing Company.
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.Michael Sandel - 1982 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 47 references / Add more references