Surveyability and the sorites paradox

Philosophia Mathematica 3 (2):157-165 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some issues raised by the notion of surveyability and how it is represented mathematically are explored. Wright considers the sense in which the positive integers are surveyable and suggests that their structure will be a weakly finite, but weakly infinite, totality. One way to expose the incoherence of this account is by applying Wittgenstein's distinction between intensional and extensional to it. Criticism of the idea of a surveyable proof shows the notion's lack of clarity. It is suggested that this concept should be replaced by that of a feasible operation, as strict finitism aims to understand the boundaries of legitimate mathematical knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
233 (#174,905)

6 months
42 (#201,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is strict finitism arbitrary?Nuno Maia - 2026 - Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):1119-1137.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references