Feminist reflections have led to a rethinking of many aspects of our contemporary world, such as the concept of masculinity and its power relations. In Western civilisation, in fact, man is the archetype, thus making his supremacy part of the natural order of things. This very naturalness, discursively produced and performed, is what has made man invisible and universal, hence without the need to think-and think oneself-in terms of gender. As a result, man has convinced himself that he is (...) not influenced by his own masculinity and can speak for all mankind, becoming the logos through which he declines the rest, prescribing 'consonant' ways of being a man or a woman. Historically, then, different power relations have developed, generating violent forms of communication that, on a daily basis, reiterate a hegemonic and sexist social model. This has led to the production of certain stereotypical attributes that have subsequently flowed into different social dynamics, establishing different roles and work possibilities that have welded structural problems: such as, for example, the 'glass ceiling'. The aim of this analysis, therefore, will be to reason about the concept of masculinity and the consequent hegemonic-linguistic structures, wondering how such reflections can be translated back into the corporate sphere. This is with the aim of producing anti-discriminatory and equal systems that improve workers' conditions, as well as their general outlook on gender issues. The methodology adopted will see the use of philosophical-pragmatic theoretical reflection, in particular around the theory of linguistic performativity, fused with empirical data collection in the corporate sphere as a result of questionnaires, contextual analyses and training courses carried out at an Italian corporation. (shrink)

In her book, Down Girl, Manne proposes to uncover the “logic” of misogyny, bringing clarity to a notion that she describes as both “loaded” and simultaneously “politically marginal.” Manne is aware that full insight into the “logic” of misogyny will require not just a “what” but a “why.” Though Manne finds herself largely devoted to the former task, the latter is in the not-too-distant periphery. -/- Manne proposes to understand misogyny, as a general framework, in terms of what it does (...) to women. Misogyny, she writes, is a system that polices and enforces the patriarchal social order (33). That’s the “what.” As for the “why,” Manne suggests that misogyny is what women experience because they fail to live up to the moral standards set out for women by that social order. I find Manne’s analysis insightful, interesting, and well argued. And yet, I find her account incomplete. While I remain fully convinced by her analysis of what misogyny is, I am less persuaded by her analysis of why misogyny is. For a full analysis of the “logic” of misogyny, one needs to understand how the patriarchy manifests in men an interest in participating in its enforcement. Or so I hope to motivate here. I aim to draw a line from the patriarchy to toxic masculinity to misogyny so that we have a clearer picture as to why men are invested in this system. I thus hope to offer here an analysis that is underdeveloped in Manne’s book, but is equally worthy of attention if we want fully to understand the complex machinations underlying misogyny. (shrink)

This paper develops and presents a conceptual framework for understanding how masculinities are negotiated through the lens of Risk Desire (RD): valorisation or resistance against various forms of risk. Drawing together literatures from sociology, psychology, and gender studies, as well as two case-studies from the author's past embedded research, a RD framework is presented that articulates how different masculinities influence and are reciprocally influenced by risk. The analysis considers cultural norms, contextual socialisation, and psychological factors, and how these vary across (...) contexts, and intersect with identities such as age, class and socioeconomic status. By integrating theoretical insights with empirical findings from past men and masculinities and identity-risk research, this work frames risk as an object of desire: operating in parallel and connection with masculine identity negotiation, but not as a sole demonstrator of masculine status as many works suggest, presenting a new conceptual direction to underpin future research in public health, criminology, and organisational behaviour interconnected with varied masculine gender identities, displays, performances, and sense-makings. Implications for further directions and research in this area using the RD framework are discussed. (shrink)

Recent feminist and postmodern thought has critiqued traditional conceptions of masculinity, describing the effect that the distinctive masculinity of the "man of reason" has had on the history of philosophy, on consciousness, and on the academy. A common characteristic of the recent literature on masculinity is that it reflects the historical and cultural context in which it is written -- a context of binary, hierarchical dualisms which involve certain symbolic associations. These dualisms, such as Man-Woman, masculine-feminine, and (...) reason-emotion, arguably find their roots in Pythagorean philosophy and can be traced through the Renaissance to our current historical context. One example is our conception of reason: the association of maleness with a clear, determinate mode of thought, i.e. reason, was incorporated into the form-matter distinction that was central to Greek thought. This paper will show that in cases where women attempt to redefine the dichotomy by revaluing the traditionally feminine (like feelings and emotions) over the traditionally masculine (like reason) their work is often mistakenly criticized for being purely political; conversely, when men attempt to redefine the same dichotomy in an attempt to allow men to "get back in touch with their feelings," to be nurturers, their work is described in terms of providing a better epistemology. The current literature on masculinity explores alternatives to rewriting or redefining Woman that try to avoid the problem of status remaining with redefinition. This alternative is rewriting or redefining Man. Through redefining Man, one may be able to reconceptualize the privileged side of the hierarchical dualism in such a way that it is no longer privileged. Deprivileging, as well as redefining Man, is argued by theorists of masculinity to be possible because while the devalued status of the inferior side of a hierarchical dualism tends to keep the same status when redefined, it may be possible to redefine the privileged side of the dualism in such a way that it loses its privileged status. Unfortunately, many of these attempts to rewrite or redefine masculinity have detrimental faults of their own. Finally, this paper will discuss more promising possibilities for new definitions of Man, as well as a vision for better interaction between the work of women and men in general. (shrink)

Gender studies has generated numerous questions around “neutral” forms, such as the concept of “Self”. The aim of this analysis is to highlight how “neutral” forms are central to the reiteration of the binary model and the dominance of “man2”. Historically, man is the archetype, placing his supremacy as part of the natural order of things. Inserted into this model, many thinkers have considered the male as the transcendental gender, so, elevating the masculine as universal, a-sexed and decorporealised. In this (...) way, man has convinced himself that he’s not conditioned by his masculinity and can speak for all humanity, becoming the logosthrough which he declines the rest. Man, therefore, has made himself “neutral” – both in the conceptual sense and in the grammatical structure (particularly of binary languages such as Italian) – by taking control of language. Through it, he orders and constitutes the world, developing dichotomies and signifying anatomical bodies. In this research, it is intended to work on language and the relationship between “neutral” and power, emphasizing how that relationship is central to the reproduction of the patriarchal model. Through a critical philosophical reflection, which sees a logical-linguistic and historical-processual methodological structure, the discourse of the I-neutral will be crossed, pointing out how that “neutral” is in truth male. The concluding goal will be to, through “fluid” visions, build the basis for a language that is truly neutral and ready to embrace multiplicity, without relations of domination; a language really inclusive and not a reiterator of the patriarchal model. (shrink)

This paper argues that contemporary discourse collapses three fundamentally distinct dimensions -- biological sex, psychological identity, and energetic polarity -- into one undifferentiated construct, producing systematic confusion in both clinical and theoretical contexts. Introducing the concept of Energetic Anatomy, the paper identifies seven neuro-endocrine-lymphatic hubs where the nervous, endocrine, and lymphatic systems physically converge, corresponding to the classical chakra system. These hubs are not metaphorical but represent literal anatomical junctions documented across neuroscience, endocrinology, and lymphatic research. The paper proposes that (...) a civilizational Eclipse is underway: the masculine principle moving inward toward interoceptive sensitivity while the feminine moves outward toward structural authority. Drawing on Craig, Porges, McCraty, Schleip, Jung, Steiner, and Vedic somatic traditions, the author presents testable predictions operationalized through interoceptive accuracy, heart rate variability, and alexithymia measures, reframing sovereignty as a dimensional achievement grounded in Energetic Anatomy rather than a political category. (shrink)

This essay examines the crisis of masculine identity after the deconstruction of traditional gender roles through the concepts of semantic fields and semantic attractors. It argues that cultures do not merely contain meanings, but stabilize them through repeated symbolic forms, roles, institutions, and patterns of recognition. Traditional gender roles functioned as powerful semantic attractors, providing orientation and continuity while also stabilizing asymmetrical distributions of power and symbolic value. Their deconstruction was therefore necessary, but it did not automatically generate new forms (...) of orientation. Drawing on the distinction between Ω₄⁺ and Ω₄⁻, the essay interprets deconstruction as the suspension of fixed asymmetrical attractors. In its non-destructive form, this suspension may restore relational plasticity and open the possibility of new constellations; in its destructive form, it may harden into resentment, regression, or compensatory counter-identities. Wim Wenders’ cinema is read as an aesthetic articulation of masculine suspension, while life coaching, podcast culture, digital discourse, and contemporary reconstructionist figures are examined as attempts to form new attractors in a post-deconstructive field. The essay concludes that responsible reconstruction cannot be prescribed as a new doctrine of masculinity. It requires a cultural ecology in which non-dominating attractors can emerge historically from the opened field, preserving the plasticity made possible by deconstruction while resisting regressive crystallization. Under conditions of external pressure, including military or civilizational insecurity, this process may accelerate, making the quality of emerging attractors a decisive question for cultural coherence. (shrink)

This paper initiates analytic inquiry into the metaphysics of masculinity. I argue that individual masculinities (such as ‘clone masculinity’ and ‘incel masculinity’) are distinct homeostatic property cluster kinds related to gender structures via processes of adherence, failed-adherence, selective adherence, and/or reinterpretation with respect to male-coded social norms.

The Second Sex can be read as a compelling philosophical exploration of masculinity. Beauvoir proposes to understand masculinity as a situation. It is an impasse as men are stuck in a position where they seek recognition from women, but they construct women in such a way that the recognition women can give them is incomplete and unsatisfying. This understanding of masculinity is crucial for Beauvoir’s emancipatory agenda and suggests that men have nonaltruistic reasons to take part in (...) feminist movements. (shrink)

Feminist considerations have induced a rethinking of many aspects of our contemporary world, such as the concept of gender and power relations. This has led to a re-examination of the entire previous tradition of thought, finding in phallogocentrism the paradigm of reference. This term indicates, starting with Derrida's considerations, the Western tendency to have centred not only the logos, but also the phallus, weaving an intricate relationship between masculinity and language. It's precisely this bond that makes man the archetype (...) on which society is founded, placing his supremacy in the natural order, defining power relations and nailing pre-established categories. A being-nailed in the Lévinasian sense, thus an adherence between the agreement of voices and being, which produces 'category-beings' in which pre-delineated social identity is concealed in a condition of 'nature', such as the 'being-male'. It's precisely this naturalness, discursively produced, that has made man universal. Consequently, man has convinced himself that he can speak for all humanity, becoming the logos through which he declines the rest. Declinations that have produced rigid and hierarchical categories that precede and define each person, prescribing 'consonant' ways, rhetorically assumed as 'human nature'. The "nature" of being man or woman does not, in fact, concern monolithic essentialisms, but rather movements of intertwined meanings in a process that Derrida defines as différance. A process, therefore, in becoming, which has over time produced unequal power relations, justifying them as "natural", and which daily reiterates a hegemonic and sexist social model. The aim of this analysis, hence, will be to bring phallogocentric masculinity and consequent hegemonic structures into the field of philosophical reflection, with the purpose of redirecting praxis towards performative processes of characterisation the person, rather than a pre-delineated categorisation. Thus, to release being from socio-cultural categories, which historical-performative praxis nails to each body. (shrink)

The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) lists 1571 as the year of the first recorded use of the English word ‘masculinity’; the Ancient Greek ανδρεια (andreia), usually translated as ‘courage’, was also used to refer to manliness. The notion of manliness or masculinity is undoubtedly older still. Yet, despite this seeming familiarity, not only is the notion proving to be highly elusive, its understanding by the society being in a constant flux, but also one which is at the root (...) of bitter division and confrontation, and which has tangible and far-reaching real-world effects. At the same time, while masculinity has been attracting an increasing amount of attention in academia, the large body of published work seldom goes to the very foundations of the issue, failing to explicitly and with clarity reach a consensus as to how masculinity ought to be understood. Herein I critique the leading contemporary thought, showing it to be poorly conceived and confounded, and often lacking in substance which would raise it to the level of the actionable and constructive. Hence, I propose an alternative view which is void of the observed deficiencies, and discuss how its adoption would facilitate a conciliation between the currently warring factions, focusing everybody’s efforts on addressing the actual ethical, deconfounded of specious distractions. (shrink)

In English, as in many other languages, male-gendered pronouns are sometimes used to refer not only to men, but to individuals whose gender is unknown or unspecified, to human beings in general (as in ―mankind‖) and sometimes even to females (as when the casual ―Hey guys‖ is spoken to a group of women). These so-called he/man or masculine generics have come under fire in recent decades for being sexist, even archaic, and positively harmful to women and girls; and advocates of (...) gender-neutral (or nonsexist) language have put forward serious efforts to discourage their use. Have they been successful, and to what extent? In this paper, I review some of the main arguments in favor of abolishing sexist male generics. I then present three studies tracking the use of he/man terminology in academic, popular, and personal discourse over the past several decades. I show that the use of these terms has fallen dramatically in recent years, while nonsexist alternatives have gradually taken their place. We may be paying witness to the early stages of the ultimate extinction of masculine generics. (shrink)

This article, published in The Psychologist (British Psychological Society) online on 8 May 2026, explores how dominant masculine norms shape men’s experiences of trauma, emotional distress, and therapeutic engagement. Drawing on over a decade of qualitative and ethnographic research in male-dominated environments, the article examines how emotional containment and stoicism can function both as protective strategies and as barriers to recovery. The paper argues that trauma may be experienced by many men as a disruption to masculine identity itself, and advocates (...) for therapeutic approaches that work alongside, rather than against, masculine identity structures. (shrink)

In the context of feminist and postmodern thought, traditional conceptions of masculinity and what it means to be a “Real Man” have been critiqued. In Genevieve Lloyd's The Man of Reason, this critique takes the form of exposing the effect that the distinctive masculinity of the “man of reason” has had on the history of philosophy. One major feature of the masculine-feminine dichotomy will emerge as a key notion for understanding the rest of the paper: the dichotomy of (...) reason-feeling, a parallel and a foundational aspect to the dichotomy of masculinity and femininity. In exploring the history of symbolic conceptions of masculinity in ancient Greece, the Renaissance, and the present, one finds that the oppression of women is integrally linked to the traditional tie between masculinity and reason. There have been many efforts in recent feminist philosophy to rewrite or redefine “Woman” in such a way as to alleviate the oppression of women. I argue that the effectiveness of rewriting Woman for this purpose is problematic, primarily because any rewriting of this type must occur in the current historical context of hierarchical dualisms, like Man-Woman, masculine-feminine, male-female. These binary oppositions arguably find their roots in Pythagorean philosophy and can be traced through the Renaissance to our current historical context. It is these dualisms that have traditionally valued the masculine side of the Man-Woman dichotomy more than the feminine. Further, it will be argued that the hierarchical dualism of Man and Woman is so pervasive that if we rewrite or redefine the inferior, deprivileged side of that dualism, we cannot correct its devalued status. Instead, we redefine that which is undervalued but retain its devalued status. This particular aspect of attempts to critique hierarchical dualisms like reason and feeling has been reflected in the writings of many feminists, male and female. This paper will show that in cases where women attempt to redefine the dichotomy by revaluing the traditionally feminine (like feelings and emotions) over the traditionally masculine (like reason) their work is often mistakenly criticized for being purely political; conversely, when men attempt to redefine the same dichotomy in an attempt to allow men to “get back in touch with their feelings,” to be nurturers, their work is described in terms of providing a better epistemology. The current literature on masculinity explores alternatives to rewriting or redefining Woman that try to avoid the problem of status remaining with redefinition. This alternative is rewriting or redefining Man. Through redefining Man, one may be able to reconceptualize the privileged side of the hierarchical dualism in such a way that it is no longer privileged. Deprivileging, as well as redefining Man, is argued by theorists of masculinity to be possible because while the devalued status of the inferior side of a hierarchical dualism tends to keep the same status when redefined, it may be possible to redefine the privileged side of the dualism in such a way that it loses its privileged status. Unfortunately, many of these attempts to rewrite or redefine masculinity have detrimental faults of their own. Finally, this paper will discuss more promising possibilities for new definitions of Man, as well as a vision for better interaction between the work of women and men in general. (shrink)

Masculinities: Liberation through PhotographyBarbican Art Gallery, 20 February–17 May 2020.

This paper will focus on the notion of toxic masculinity that has a lot to do with deforming the male identity figure. I am here really concerned with probing within the need of conforming with the traditional masculinity ideology in the East and the West, and how it hinders males from discovering what it means to be a male. Actually, the scope of research in this paper exceeds one culture to include both the Western and the Eastern cultures, (...) which have proved with evidence to share many attributes. I am also revealing how this masculinity has been misinterpreted over the years to encompass weird attitudes and behaviors as suppressing emotions or masking distress or showing violence as an indicator of power. How the idea of the necessity of being “tough all the time” may affect their mental and psychological wellbeing and what is less than that could stigmatize them for being “feminine” or “weak”. In this paper, I will also try to reveal how great sector of women unintentionally feeds this ego of toxic masculinity to their sons since childhood days. By connecting all these factors to the development of the characters in Victor Surge’s novel “Men in Prison”, we are simply highlighting the psychological dimension and consequences of suppressed men. It is regarded as an unfiltered view of humanity in the early 20th century. The depraving brutality that Serge experienced behind bars is mirroring a society subduing men in various levels. I hopefully seek to break down factors that trap men in a certain framework out of which there is no escape. (shrink)

This study explores experiences of ex-incels—men who have withdrawn from incel communities—through eleven qualitative interviews analysed using R.W. Connell’s hegemonic masculinity (HM) framework. Findings reveal some ex-incels adopt flexible masculinities, while others struggle with prescriptive norms perpetuated by the anti-feminist ‘manosphere’. Findings spotlight identity reconstructions, where men both reject and remain influenced by rigid archetypes, performing hybrid masculinities. This study deepens understanding of incel ideology, its impact on identity, and interplay between inceldom and masculinities via contributing to hybrid masculinities (...) theorising. Insights presents applications for gender theory and inform further research on HM’s influence within unique cultural contexts. (shrink)

The contemporary American political landscape is no longer defined merely by a divergence in policy preferences, but by a profound schism in neurobiological processing, cognitive styles, and psychological self-regulation. The convergence of the Trump administration's populist rhetoric, the strategic objectives of elite technocrats, and the mobilization of traditionalist social agendas suggests a systematic harnessing of specific psychological vulnerabilities. This report examines the data-driven evidence indicating that modern conservative movements capitalize on masculine insecurity, xenophobic threat detection, and emotional dysregulation to consolidate (...) power. If the United States is indeed progressing toward internal conflict, the evidence indicates the fault lines will likely align with psychological profiles: a confrontation between populations characterized by high threat sensitivity and low cognitive reflection-the "dumb and fearful"-against those demonstrating high conflict monitoring and analytical evidence-gathering capacities-the "intelligent and caring.". (shrink)

Scotland's North Sea offshore oil-drilling-fields have long been stereotyped as sites reinforcing and reproducing unique forms of masculinities aligning with hegemonic masculinity (HM) descriptors: stoicism, competition, and conflict. Oilfields encompass near-all-male workplaces, requiring labour in difficult conditions, distancing from friends, family, and home life. Emerging research in oilfields has begun to resist the HM-stereotype in favour of complex understandings of masculinities, labour-and-identity performances. This work details findings from a lengthy ‘embedded’ ethnography of the UK Offshore Oilfield. Specifically, highlighting and (...) discussing men's metaphorical ‘mask wearing’ practices: the process by which oilmen engaged in complex performances of masculinities that resist HM yet retained overt components of stoicism; a key HM-descriptor. This ‘masked’ stoicism was presented and performed in unique ways that bridged genuine and non-genuine performances of oilfield masculine identities and interconnected with resistances against risk-taking and supports for safety. Goffman's dramaturgical perspective is applied to deepen and interrogate findings. Salient implications for oilmen's wellbeing, masculinities theory and future study are put forward. (shrink)

Near the middle of his first discussion with Lysis, Socrates asks an odd question—he asks if Lysis’ mother lets him play with her loom or touch her woolworking tools (208d1-e2). It is one of many odd questions, of course, but it is odd nonetheless. Odd, and also funny: it is the one of just two comments in the book that makes Lysis laugh. This question, I argue, reveals the profound depth of Socrates’ inquiry about Lysis’ views about himself and his (...) loved ones. Indeed, the challenge is so profound that at first the only response is laughter. One aspect is a challenge to certain ideals of masculinity, and so I briefly discuss Athenian conceptions of gender and masculinity, along with some Platonic questioning of these conceptions. Reading the Lysis through the lens of gender reveals not only the continued relevance of such a lens, but also the intensity of Socrates’ work, which calls into question basic social structures and markers of identity, like gender, in its pursuit of a liberatory turn to philosophy. We gain insight into his challenge to Athenian understanding of masculinity by observing the way that Socrates’ argumentation undermines much of it, and we more fully appreciate Socrates’ arguments if we see that they intend to subvert gendered expectations. The setting of the dialogue, the questions Socrates asks, and the responses from Lysis all reinforce that what is at stake in the text is Lysis’ character, including his masculinity. (shrink)

This philosophical treatise examines the contemporary phenomenon of "chivalric confusion"—the paradoxical state in which traditional masculine protective instincts conflict with modern social dynamics and feminist ideological frameworks. Through analysis of documented cases, empirical research, and philosophical inquiry, this work explores how men's traditional drive to protect and defend the vulnerable has become complicated by legal liabilities, social misinterpretations, and changing gender dynamics. Drawing from evolutionary psychology (Buss, 2019), Jungian archetypal theory (Moore & Gillette, 1990), ambivalent sexism research (Glick & Fiske, (...) 1996, 2001), Hegelian recognition theory (Hegel, 1807; Honneth, 1995), and contemporary sociological evidence, the treatise argues that current social structures have created an environment where acting upon protective impulses may result in legal, social, or professional consequences, leading to a systematic withdrawal of protective behaviors. This work raises critical questions about the unintended consequences of social movements on mutual aid and examines whether society has inadvertently dismantled essential protective mechanisms. The analysis reveals a profound crisis in masculine identity, social trust, and the fundamental human capacity for altruistic intervention, suggesting that resolution requires reimagining protection not as gendered behavior but as mutual recognition and shared human responsibility. (shrink)

The dynamism between otherness and differences with identity and equivalence provides key ideas for analyzing the process of gender individuation by artistic works. In this article I discuss the problem of artistic and aesthetic reactions to homogeneous cultural patterns of masculinity, which is characterized by the concept of "toxic masculinity" in pop-cultural, sociological, psychological and gender studies discourses. One common theme is that "toxic masculinity" encompasses harmful standards that generate antagonisms and diminish multi-figure masculinity to a (...) singular "socially acceptable" level at the expense of children, women and men - and thus society as a whole. The artist's task is to reveal this noxiousness, and to highlight the value of the coexistence of a variety of forms of masculinity in terms of its diversity, thereby helping to mitigate the consequences of disruptive gender relations. (shrink)

This article examines the emergence of the “High-T warrior” as a contemporary masculine attractor linking biological optimization, religious hierarchy, military lethality, and national dominance. Beginning with the post-deconstructive weakening of inherited male roles, it distinguishes an open reconstruction, in which strength is reconfigured within relations of equality, from a compensatory counter-form organized around hardness, aggression, hierarchy, and readiness for conflict. The analysis traces three stages of this counter-form: the medicalization of masculine adequacy through testosterone, the sacralization of male authority in (...) Doug Wilson’s theology, and the institutionalization of the warrior ideal in Pete Hegseth’s military reforms. Particular attention is given to the shift from clinically indicated treatment to institutionally defined optimization and the resulting erosion of substantive voluntariness. A semantic-field approach explains why attractors can exert greater formative force than moral prescriptions. A legitimate masculine reconstruction must therefore acquire cultural density without deriving its coherence from women’s subordination or inherited hierarchy. (shrink)

This paper responds to two trends in debates about Plato's view of women in the Republic. First, many scholars argue or assume that Plato seeks to minimize the influence of femininity in the ideal city, and to make guardian women themselves as “masculine” as possible. Second, scholars who address the relationship between Plato's views of women and his psychological theory tend to focus on the reasoning and appetitive parts of the tripartite soul. In response to the first point, we argue (...) that the idea that Plato seeks to masculinize/de-feminize the city oversimplifies his treatment of Greek gender norms. Although he does want to eliminate some traditionally feminine qualities from the city, he also seeks to eliminate many masculine qualities as well. Moreover, while he tries to make guardian women more like men in some respects, he simultaneously aims to make guardian men more like Greek women in important ways. Regarding the second point, we argue that this project of reimagining gender norms is illuminated by Plato's psychology, but instead of emphasizing reason and appetite, we show how his views are connected to his account of the third, “spirited” part of the soul, thumos, and its dual hard/soft or aggressive/gentle nature. (shrink)

This paper challenges the prevailing constructivist view of gendered consciousness by proposing that masculine and feminine principles constitute archetypal polarities rooted in human neurobiology rather than social conditioning. Drawing on seven years of cross-cultural research conducted across twenty-three countries, the study identifies distinct somatic signatures for each principle through measurements of interoceptive accuracy, heart rate variability patterns, and hemispheric lateralization. The theoretical framework synthesizes Jungian anima/animus dynamics with polyvagal theory, somatic psychology, and hemispheric specialization research. A Polarity Integration Model is (...) proposed, demonstrating through six testable hypotheses how balanced masculine-feminine integration correlates with elevated consciousness states. This framework contributes to philosophy of mind and consciousness studies by offering an empirically grounded model of psychospiritual development that bridges depth psychology, contemplative traditions, and contemporary neuroscience. (shrink)

This study examines how several gender-encoding strategies in Spanish and social factors influence gender perception, reinforcing or mitigating a sexist male bias. Using an experimental design, we tested four linguistic conditions in a job recruitment context: masculine forms (theoretically generic), gender-splits, epicenes, and non-binary neomorpheme “-e”. After reading a profile in one of these conditions, 837 participants (52% women) selected an image of a woman or man. Results show that masculine forms lead to the lowest selection of female candidates, manifesting (...) a male bias. In contrast, gender-fair language (GFL) strategies, particularly the neomorpheme (les candidates), elicited the highest selection of female images. Importantly, not only did linguistic factors and participants’ gender identity influence results —with male participants selecting significantly more men in the masculine condition—, but affinity with feminist and LGBTQIA+ movements or positive attitudes towards GFL also modulated responses —increasing female selections in GFL, but reinforcing male selections in the masculine—. Additionally, no extra cognitive cost was found for GFL strategies compared to masculine expressions. These findings highlight the importance, not only of linguistic forms, but of social and attitudinal factors in shaping gender perception, with implications for reducing gender biases in language use and broader efforts toward social equity. Keywords: Male bias; gender-fair language; masculine generics; Spanish; non-binary neomorphemes; gender splits; sexism; feminism; attitudes. (shrink)

An Article with a map of professions, a mapping of power/knowledge.

Herman Melville’s Moby Dick is open to many readings, but one that has yet to be explored is the existential reading of Ahab’s pursuit from a gender perspective. By weaving together biblical, mythical, and mystical elements, the novel promises that Captain Ahab’s vengeance on the whale actually transcends the expected qualities of a maritime quest. A self-made man, Ahab endures his ever-present obsession and relentlessly clings to his deadliest struggle, which echoes Sartre’s proclamation, “Man is nothing else but what he (...) makes of himself.” Yet, intricately entwined with the spirit of nineteenth-century America, Ahab's character also assumes a canonical representation of American ideals. Thus, his hunting pursuit is overlaid onto America’s expansionist and imperialist mindset in the nineteenth century, which complements the hegemonically masculine manner camouflaged under this political ethos. Bearing this in mind, Melville subtly indicates that Ahab’s urge to assert his superiority over the whale is related to the biblical context of appointing females as something to take revenge on. In this narrative, Ahab's embodiment of the American hero undergoes a metamorphosis into an American Adam figure by asserting dominance over the whale that symbolises female subjugation. Interrogating Ahab's portrayal as an American Adam-type within the broader societal and political contexts of supremacist ideals, this article delves into Ahab's pursuit through the lens of Sartrean Existentialism. By doing so, this article interprets Ahab’s idealistic quest to hunt down the whale as a metaphor for hegemonic masculinity and subordinate femininity by exploring the subject/object, and the pursuer/pursued dynamics. (shrink)

There is a famous and important dictum reminiscent of the medieval age posited by Carl Jung in Alchemical Studies, the thirteenth volume of his collected works: in sterquiliniis invenitur—in filth it shall be found (35). Translated for modern society this might be better understood as “that which is most valuable will be found in the place you least want to look.” If there is one source in the corpus of popular culture that best typifies “the last place we would want (...) to look” for masculine values, it would be Mads Mikkelsen’s portrayal of Hannibal Lector, particularly Lector’s relationship with FBI profiler Will Graham during the first two seasons of the HBO series Hannibal. By stripping away the perverse horror of Lector’s actions toward Graham, and treating their relationship as an absolute value, I systematically explore the series’ portrayal of masculine nurturing in a way that reveals potentially praiseworthy facets relevant to modern masculinity. (shrink)

This article is a psychological analysis of the film A Thin Red Line by Terrence Malick. It examines the work from the perspective of Jungian complex theory.

This paper examines Shinji Ikari’s repeated withdrawal, refusal, and breakdown in *Neon Genesis Evangelion* through psychoanalysis, masculinity studies, and queer theories of failure. Building on existing accounts of Shinji’s conflict with hegemonic masculinity, it shifts the question from whether Shinji embodies a nonhegemonic masculinity to how failure itself is produced, experienced, and normatively judged. The paper proposes a two-level model of failure. The first level distinguishes three subjective modes: incapacity, refusal, and post-violence breakdown. The second concerns normative (...) attribution: how institutions, narratives, other characters, and reception cultures translate these different states into weakness, cowardice, immaturity, or failed masculinity. Their political effects are evaluated through three heuristic dimensions: norm visibility, interruption of violent role reproduction, and ethical accountability. Comparing the television series, *The End of Evangelion*, and the *Rebuild of Evangelion* films, the paper argues that queer failure becomes politically significant when it exposes the coercive and violent conditions underlying masculine “success,” while remaining irreducible to either resistance or ethical innocence. The central issue is therefore not whether escape is morally superior to combat, but who has the authority to define success and whether subjective worth can be separated from functional and masculine performance. (shrink)

Masculinity? This book attempts to answer this one-word question by revisiting key philosophical concepts in the construction of masculinity, not in order to re-write or debunk them again, but in order to provide a radically new departure to what masculinity means today. This new departure focuses on an understanding of sexuality and gender that is neither structured in oppositional terms nor in performative terms, but in a perpendicular relation akin to that which brings space and time together. (...) In doing so, this book doesn’t aim to establish yet another theory within the field of masculism or men’s studies, but to put forward a personal account of how a revised understanding of the relationship between space, time, and gender can thoroughly alter concepts of masculinity. virility and patriarchy. (shrink)

This chapter presents a positive philosophy of male sexuality: one that is not rooted in so-called toxic masculinity and which is compatible with gender equality. I argue that, for such a sexuality to be possible, respect is the moral baseline. However, the status quo for male sexuality is shaped by white supremacy and heteronormativity. To resist these values, men must do more than merely cross some minimal moral threshold for permissible sex. Rather, they ought to develop a caring character (...) so that they would want to seek out their own and their partner’s (robust) sexual fulfillment. Men ought actively to develop ways to increase pleasure for themselves and their partners. (shrink)

Patientia, the virtue of enduring physiological pain, poses a problem for Roman elite masculinities. The male body is supposed to be unpenetrated, but when pain is inflicted the body is often cut and pierced. This paper looks at literary and philosophical representations of the moral exemplar Mucius Scaevola to see how Roman writers and philosophers deal with this dilemma.

While this article sets out to advance our knowledge about the characteristics of Nigerian cybercriminals (Yahoo-Boys), it is also the first study to explore the narratives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) officers concerning them. It appraises symbolic interactionist insights to consider the ways in which contextual factors and worldview may help to illuminate officers’ narratives of cybercriminals and the interpretations and implications of such accounts. Semi-structured interviews of forty frontline EFCC officers formed the empirical basis of this (...) study and were subjected to a directed approach of qualitative content analysis. While prior studies, for example, indicated that only a group of cybercriminals deploy spiritual and magical powers to defraud victims (i.e. modus operandi), our data analysis extended this classification into more refined levels involving multiple features. In particular, analysis bifurcates cybercriminals and their operations based on three factors: [a] educational-attainment, [b] modus-operandi, and [c] networks-collaborators. Results also suggest that these cybercriminals and their operations are embedded in “masculinity-and-material-wealth”. These contributions thus have implications for a range of generally accepted viewpoints about these cybercriminals previously taken-for-granted. Since these criminals have victims all over the world, insights from our study may help various local and international agencies [a] to understand the actions/features of these two groups of cybercriminals better and develop more effective response strategies. [b] to appreciate the vulnerabilities of their victims better and develop more adequate support schemes. We also consider the limitations of social control agents’ narratives on criminals. (shrink)

In this paper, I explore how Christian theology grapples with whether God has a gender—or if God transcends gender altogether—and how these perspectives influence both doctrine and worship. Many theologians insist on referring to God as exclusively masculine, while feminist and egalitarian voices challenge this practice, claiming that an overtly gendered God can conflict with the ideals of equality and with the principle of the imago Dei. After examining the socio-linguistic and historical factors behind the predominance of masculine divine imagery, (...) I move on to discuss Michael Rea’s argument that attributing an unequal gender to God is metaphysically problematic. Rea argues that framing God in a strictly masculine way conflicts with the belief that men and women are equal image-bearers of God. I then present an objection to Rea’s view, based on the idea that not every divine attribute has to be mirrored in humanity. By distinguishing between attributes that are “image-relevant” and those that are not, I argue how one might conceive of a gendered God without undermining human equality and perfect being theology. I furthermore argue that why gender cannot be an image-relevant attribute of God, opening a conceptual room for the reconciliation of tradition, egalitarianism, and the doctrine of imago dei. Finally, I highlight the importance of considering socio-linguistic realities, feminist insights, and pastoral ramifications in deciding how best to speak of God in ways that respect both traditional theology and modern ethical commitments. (shrink)

This essay examines the transformation of contemporary football from a rule-bound cultural form into an increasingly global entertainment product. Starting from recent changes in the interpretation of physical contact, it argues that football depends on a fragile balance between flow and interruption, intensity and protection, tactical freedom and the limits of bodily exposure. The article shows how this balance is being altered by media, commercial, and tournament logics that reward uninterrupted action, emotional escalation, and spectacular images. Particular attention is given (...) to set-piece situations and the renewed protection of the goalkeeper, where the divergence between European club football and FIFA tournament football becomes especially visible. The analysis then broadens to the material and atmospheric conditions of the World Cup, including stadium environments, pitch quality, event logistics, and commercial staging. Finally, the essay situates these developments within a wider cultural pattern: the transformation of masculine energy from disciplined strength into staged aggression. Football, it argues, is not merely a game to be won or lost, but a public cultural arena in which societies learn what strength, rivalry, fairness, restraint, and masculinity are supposed to mean. (shrink)

Gender studies have generated numerous questions regarding the potential of language and the power relations it produces, especially after the philosopher Judith Butler's reinterpretation of Austinian performativity theory. She in fact reinterpreted this theory not only in linguistic terms, but also in relation to the normative power that nails biological fates to anatomical bodies, pinning them into roles and permissions defined by dominant praxis. With the theory of gender performativity, the connection between language, identity and power becomes even clearer and (...) more incisive, seeing hate speech as playing a central role in both the maintenance of praxis and the disciplining of people in accordance with such praxis. Starting from a reflection on the universalization of man through the appropriation of language-logos, the aim of this paper will therefore be to highlight the intricate link between hate speech and hegemonic masculinity. It will then emphasize how the denigrating and punitive functionality of hate speech is central to the reiteration of the subordinating binarism on which patriarchal hegemony is founded. In this way, it will be possible to think of strategies, such as re-signification, that not only disarm the violent potential of hate speech, but also contribute to rewriting the underlying social praxis, producing anti-discriminatory and equalitarian models. (shrink)

Feminist, critical race, and postcolonial theories have established that social identities such as race and gender are mutually constitutive—i.e., that they “intersect.” I argue that “cultural appropriation” is never merely the appropriation of culture, but also of gender, sexuality, class, etc. For example, “white hipness” is the appropriation of stereotypical black masculinity by white males. Looking at recent videos from black male hip-hop artists, I develop an account of “postmillennial black hipness.” The inverse of white hipness, this practice involves (...) the appropriation, by black men, of stereotypical white gay masculinity and/or non-American, non-white femininity. I also argue that Shephard Fairey’s recent images of (mainly militant) non-Western women of color can be read as a new form of white hipness that revises the traditional logic in two ways: (1) by appropriating non-white femininity rather than masculinity, and (2) by adopting the practice of postmillennial black hipness itself. (shrink)

The men’s rights movement (MRM) is often dismissed as inherently misogynistic, yet this label obscures the very real struggles faced by men in today’s society. From soaring suicide rates and educational disparities to family court bias and workplace fatalities, men confront systemic issues that rarely receive mainstream attention. While the rise of the “manosphere” and extremist voices has warped the public image of the MRM into one of hostility and chauvinism, the movement at its core seeks to expose the double (...) standards of gender politics and challenge the myth that gender equality has already been achieved. This paper traces the origins of the MRM, examines how online radicalization has distorted its purpose, and highlights overlooked inequities in health, education, law, and media. By separating legitimate grievances from toxic rhetoric, it argues that caring about men’s issues is not misogyny but an essential step toward true gender parity. The solution is not to pit feminism against masculinism, but to recognize that both movements illuminate different dimensions of inequality and, when pursued in good faith, can work together to create a more just and inclusive society. (shrink)

In the early twentieth century Walter Benjamin introduced the idea of epochal and ongoing progression in interaction between mind and the built environment. Since early antiquity, the present study suggests, Benjamin’s notion has been manifest in metaphors of gender in city-form, whereby edifices and urban voids have represented masculinity and femininity, respectively. At the onset of interaction between mind and the built environment are prehistoric myths related to the human body and to the sky. During antiquity gender projection can (...) be detected in western perceptions linking natural and built environments, commencing with Plato’s Atlantis and his Myth of Er, and later as a likely import of the Chinese yin-yang mythology. Culminating with the Age of Discovery, alongside advances in experiential awareness of the Earth’s sphericity, respective feminine and masculine earmarks can be detected in early modern perspicacity of the Earth’s southern and northern hemispheres. Our conceptions of natural and built environments inherently continue to contain gender traits. Yet urban voids, as the feminine face of city-form, have been severely understated in the built environment. Through design and configuration of urban voids, allegories of femininity in city-form ought to be celebrated, not discarded. (shrink)

Based on a qualitative research developed with former fighters from the paramilitarism and the extinct FARC guerrilla in Colombia, this article develops, from a feminist perspective, the analytical and political proposition of understanding armed groups as technologies of gender, understanding the production of militarized masculinities. The article conceptualizes the notion of militarized masculinities from a double component: militarization and militarism, while comparing paramilitary and guerrilla masculinities, emphasizing in how insurgent masculinity emerged inside the FARC as a type of militarized (...) masculinity characterized, among other things, by a communal subjectivity. (shrink)

This paper argues that Genesis 1–3 should not be read as historical or anthropological narrative but as a metaphysical codex encoding archetypal dynamics. Drawing from philology, symbolic interpretation, and comparative philosophy, I show that God is symbolized as the masculine principle of order and form, while Adam and Eve function as archetypes of masculine and feminine, logic and intuition respectively. The serpent is the ego, which destabilizes balance by corrupting the generative field (feminine) first. Against Anglo-German historicist and gender-hierarchical overlays, (...) I argue that the fall signifies the recursive misalignment of complementary principles, with implications for the psyche, society, and metaphysics. (shrink)

In this paper, I analyze multiple aspects of how gender norms pervaded the 2016 election, from the way Clinton and Trump announced their presidency to the way masculinity and femininity were policed throughout the election. Examples include Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Barack Obama, and Gary Johnson. I also consider how some women who support Trump reacted to allegations about sexual harassment. The difference between running for President as a man and running for President as a woman makes all the (...) difference in the world. (OPEN ACCESS). (shrink)

Abstract -/- This paper formally introduces 'Femisculine' as an ontological and philosophical construct defining a state of balanced cognitive synthesis. Breaking away from traditional binary constraints, the theory of Femisculine posits that the core of Consciousness ($C$) operates independently of biological necessity. It defines an advanced state where an individual, while retaining their bhoutika (physical) biological matrix, harmoniously integrates and expresses the co-existing dimensions of Feminine Creativity (intuitive, generative, and empathetic energy) and Masculine Logic (analytical, rational, and protective drive) to (...) form a unified, holistic subjective reality (Bhodhaanubhavam). By decoupling awareness from biological determinism, this framework offers a new paradigm that operates on a distinct dimension from sociological gender constructs, tracing the cognitive evolution of living entities. -/- Keywords: -/- Femisculine, Non-Necessitated Consciousness, Ontological Synthesis, Bhodhaanubhavam, Identity of Consciousness, Binary Fallacy, Totality Axiom, Autogenous Orientation, Cognitive Resonance, Biological Determinism. (shrink)

The Break with Freud and the Discovery of the Collective Unconscious -/- Carl Gustav Jung began his intellectual life as Freud's most gifted collaborator and chosen heir. Their eventual rupture — dramatic, painful, and philosophically consequential — turned on precisely the question of the nature and scope of the unconscious. For Freud, the unconscious was fundamentally personal: it consisted of repressed material, above all sexual and aggressive wishes, derived from the individual's biography. For Jung, this was only half the story (...) — and the lesser half. Beneath the personal unconscious, he became convinced, lay a deeper stratum that was not personal at all: a collective unconscious, shared by all human beings, containing structures and contents that had never been in individual consciousness because they preceded all individual experience. This was not a conclusion Jung reached comfortably or quickly. It emerged from years of clinical work, from his painstaking analysis of dreams and fantasies in psychotic patients, and above all from his extraordinary inner journey — the period of confrontation with his own unconscious documented in The Red Book — in which he encountered figures, images, and narratives that bore unmistakable resemblance to mythological material from cultures he had never studied. The same symbols appeared again and again across different patients, different cultures, different historical periods. This could not be explained by individual learning or transmission. It pointed to something structural in the psyche itself. -/- Archetypes: The Structural Patterns of the Collective Unconscious -/- The theory of archetypes is Jung's most original and philosophically ambitious contribution. Archetypes are not contents but forms — not specific images but the structural predispositions that determine what kinds of images the psyche tends to produce under what circumstances. Jung compared the archetype to the crystal lattice: the lattice determines the form the crystal will take, but it does not itself have a fixed form until it crystallizes in the specific mother liquor of a particular individual's life. Archetypes are the invisible skeleton of psychic experience; they are not perceived directly but through their manifestations. The major archetypes that Jung identified and explored include: the Self (das Selbst) — the central organizing principle of the psyche, the archetype of wholeness and the ultimate goal of psychological development; the Shadow — the repository of all that the ego has rejected or refused to develop, the 'dark twin' that follows every individual like an invisible companion; the Anima and Animus — the contra-sexual elements of the psyche, the inner feminine in men and inner masculine in women, which mediate the relationship between consciousness and the deeper layers of the unconscious; the Great Mother — the archetype of nurture, containment, and engulfment; the Wise Old Man and the Wise Old Woman — figures of wisdom, guidance, and transpersonal knowledge; the Trickster — the amoral, shape-shifting figure who disrupts order and facilitates transformation; the Puer Aeternus — the eternal youth, the archetype of possibility and renewal; and the Hero — the figure of ego-development, of the struggle against inertia and unconsciousness. These are not merely interesting metaphors. Jung believed they were genuine psychological realities — objective structures of the psyche that exert real influence on thought, feeling, behavior, and experience. When the Shadow is not consciously integrated, it is projected onto others, who are then experienced as wholly evil or dangerous. When the Anima is not recognized, a man is possessed by it, driven by unconscious moods and irrational entanglements. When the Self is experienced in a dream or vision, it produces a sense of numinous wholeness that cannot be reduced to anything else. The archetypes are, in this sense, the experiential face of the collective unconscious — the way its structures announce themselves to individual consciousness. -/- The Numinosum: Where Psychology Meets Religion -/- One of the most distinctive and controversial aspects of Jung's thought is his sustained engagement with religion, myth, and the sacred. Drawing on Rudolf Otto's concept of the numinosum — the awe-inspiring, tremendum et fascinans quality of genuine religious experience — Jung argued that the archetypes have an inherently numinous character. When they are encountered in dreams, visions, or waking fantasies, they produce an experience of something overwhelming, something that both terrifies and fascinates, something that feels profoundly other even while being encountered within. Jung was careful to distinguish his approach from metaphysical claims about the existence of God. He insisted he was speaking empirically, as a psychologist, about the psychological reality of the experience of the numinous — not about its theological status. But this distinction, however carefully maintained, could not prevent the recognition that his psychology was in deep conversation with the history of religion and mysticism. The archetypes of the Self, the Great Mother, the Divine Child — these are the psychological correlates of the figures that humanity has worshipped across millennia. The gods, for Jung, are not superstitions to be explained away but projections of real psychic structures onto the outer world. -/- The Process and its Stages -/- Individuation — Jung's term for the process of psychological development and integration — is perhaps the most philosophically rich concept in his entire system. It refers to the lifelong process by which an individual becomes, more and more completely, what they most deeply are: not the persona (the social mask), not the ego (the conscious self-image), but the Self — the total personality, including both its conscious and unconscious dimensions. Individuation is not a programme to be executed or a summit to be conquered; it is a process to be undergone, a way of living that involves the continuous confrontation with, and integration of, the psyche's shadow and depths. The process of individuation typically unfolds in recognizable stages, though these are never mechanically fixed. In the first half of life, the task is largely one of differentiation and adaptation: developing a coherent ego, establishing a viable persona, finding a place in the social world. The unconscious at this stage is largely experienced as threatening, as the potential for regression, for loss of control, for the eruption of instinctual energies that threaten the social adaptation so painfully achieved. In the second half of life — often precipitated by a crisis, a confrontation with mortality, a failure of the persona's adequacy — the task shifts. Now the unconscious is no longer primarily an enemy but a partner: the rich, dangerous, inexhaustible source from which the second half of life must draw its meaning. (shrink)

Trans and gender-nonconforming people sometimes say that certain gender norms are authentic for them. For example, a trans man might say that abiding by norms of masculinity tracks who he really is. Authenticity is sometimes taken to appeal to an essential, pre-social “inner self.” It is also sometimes understood as a moral notion. Authenticity claims about gender norms therefore appear inimical to two key commitments in feminist philosophy: that all gender norms are socially constructed, and that many domains of (...) gender norms are both morally and prudentially bad. I argue that that this apparent tension is illusory. Concordant with existing trans narratives of authenticity, I articulate an existentialist view that understands authenticity as a socially embedded, constructive project undertaken in a non-ideal social world, rather than a reflective uncovering of a pre-given, essential self. I then show that authenticity and morality can come apart; what is authentic for someone need not be either morally good or good for them. I conclude that the authenticity of gender norms does not cut against the feminist commitments that I identify. This conclusion enables a theoretical space that is both respectful of trans experience and critical of dominant gender norms, an important liberatory goal. (shrink)

There has been a long history of tension between feminists and feminist philosophy, on the one hand, and logic, on the other hand. This tension expresses itself in many ways, including claims that logic is a tool of the patriarchy, that logic/rationality/analytical tools in philosophy need to be rejected if women are to fully participate, that women = body and man = mind, that to do feminist philosophy one must do it as a situated, embodied person, not as an impersonal, (...) disembodied mind, that logic is “a masculine subject”. However the tension is expressed, it is women in logic and women logicians who are caught in between. The goal of my paper is to explore a conception of logic that not only is not inconsistent with being a feminist, but is actively welcoming of women as logicians. (shrink)

Talk of gender identity is at the core of heated current philosophical and political debates. Yet, it is unclear what it means to have one. I examine several ways of understanding this concept in light of core aims of trans writers and activists. Most importantly, the concept should make good trans people's understanding of their own gender identities and help understand why misgendering is a serious harm and why it is permissible to require information about people's gender identities in public (...) life. I conclude that none of the available accounts meets these essential criteria, on the assumption that the gender norms of femininity and masculinity are unjustified. But we can, and should, pursue the feminist project without “gender identity”. Such feminism can include trans people because it is possible to account for the specific harm of misgendering without assuming a claim to the recognition of our gender identities. I conclude that we should eliminate the concept of “gender identity.” To understand the phenomena that are putatively captured by “gender identity,” we are better off employing other concepts, such as “sexual dysphoria,” (assigned or aspirational) “gender roles,” and (internalised or endorsed) “gender norms”. These concepts can usefully replace “gender identity” in an individual evaluation of each of the trans people's claims to inclusion into particular spaces. (shrink)