This article considers friendship as a channel for education and as one of its objectives, as it is a necessary ingredient for a fulfilled life. This requires an initial study of interpersonal relationships in the postmodern context, considering their opportunities and risks. Our aim is to draw a topography of these relationships by analysing texts by major thinkers of the last four decades. The result of this analysis is the core of the article, namely, that there are (...) four categories which seem to give a proper account of the characteristics of interpersonal relationships in postmodernity and are relevant in education: 1) the questioning of the individual; 2) the appearance of the internet; 3) the recoveryof emotions; and, finally; 4) the extension of the feminine space. As a conclusion, they may all be said to have an ambivalent character that requires central issues in education to be reconsidered: the awareness and emotional regulation; the new constitution of identity and intimacy on the internet; education for male-female relationships, which now exist outside the sexual sphere, and preventing violence in these relationships; as well as how to educate for cooperation in an individualistic society. (shrink)

This study aims to determine the two emotion regulation strategies—cognitive reappraisal or expressive suppression—used by pre-service teachers enrolled in Philippine Normal University, and examine its relationship with their mental well-being and interpersonal relationships. This study utilized quantitative correlational research design by administering an online survey that contains three questionnaires: Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) to determine what emotion regulation strategy is frequently used, Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) to determine the state of their well-being, and the Functional Idiographic Assessment (...) Template-Questionnaire-Short Form (FIAT-Q—SF) to determine their levels of interpersonal relationship and functioning problems. The results of this study shows that frequent use of expressive suppression leads to lower levels of mental well-being and higher levels of interpersonal relationships and functioning problems, while more frequent use of cognitive reappraisal results in higher levels of mental well-being, but shows no significance or causation to interpersonal relationship and functioning problems. It can be concluded that the majority of pre-service teachers use cognitive reappraisal as their emotion regulation strategy more frequently as it was found to be significantly associated with their mental well-being levels, but was insignificant in producing interpersonal relationship difficulties. Furthermore, expressive suppression displayed more respondents with severe levels of interpersonal relationship difficulties than those who more frequently use cognitive reappraisal. The results are further discussed in light of its implications to the pre-service teachers’ well-being and mental health. (shrink)

Here we will argue that different kinds of friendships follow different kinds of scaling laws. First, we will review Aristotle’s three types of friendship. Second, we will review three different types of scaling laws. Third, we will show how the three types of friendship roughly map on to the three types of scaling laws. After this, we will discuss some of the consequences of the scaling laws of friendship. We hope that the use of these abstract scaling laws to describe (...) social values will convince computer programmers and policy makers to temper their would-be ambitions as social engineers. (shrink)

The problem discussed in this paper arises from the observation that in the course of inter-subjective communication "understanding" seems to be entrusted to the implementation of a real process, not only affective but also cognitive, of processing information contained in the perceived behavior. In a previous study (Greco, 1979) we proposed to consider this process of "reconstruction" of meaning as analogous to the process of "construction" used for oneself. Here we will deal with this process of construction or awareness using (...) theoretical models offered by experimental research. (shrink)

Despite the initial promise of social media platforms as a means of facilitating discourse on matters of civic discourse, in practice it has turned out to impair fruitful conversation on civic issues by a number of means. From self-isolation into echo chambers, to algorithmically supported filter bubbles, to widespread failure to engage politically owing to psychological phenomena like the ‘spiral of silence’, a variety of factors have been blamed. I argue that extant accounts overlook the importance of interpersonal (...) class='Hi'>relationships to sustaining quality civic discourse on social media. Drawing on an Aristotelian account of friendship with an emphasis on the value of interpersonal difference plus the influence of interactions on individual character, I argue that a common scapegoat for the failure of civic discourse online—the variety of “unfriend” disconnection tools offered on various platforms—actually show promise at promoting better-quality civic conversation and overcoming the obstacles present on social media platforms. (shrink)

An athlete has faith in her unathletic partner to run a marathon, a teacher has faith in her currently poor-performing students to improve in the future, and your friend has faith in you to succeed in the difficult project that you have been pursuing, even, and especially, when your chance of failing is non-trivial. This paper develops and defends a relational view of interpersonal faith by considering four interesting phenomena: first, in virtue of placing faith in someone, we stand (...) in solidarity with that person; second, interpersonal faith is called for during moments of difficulty, but it can seem inappropriate during moments of ease; third, one’s faith in others can feel unwelcomed, and can be rejected; and fourth, when interpersonal faith is frustrated, disappointment, rather than resentment, is warranted. I propose that when the faithor (e.g., your friend) places faith in the faithee (e.g., you) to φ, the faithor does something close to inviting the faithee to (re)commit to φ-ing. This invitation-like move, once properly taken up by the faithee, puts both sides of the faith in a new kind of normative relationship that is in the same broad family as a promissory relationship, albeit with a different normative profile. (shrink)

This companion paper extends the theory of Q⁺ Entanglement to living interpersonal and intergenerational relationships. Within the framework of Load Minimization Theory (L = U + F + E), we demonstrate how parental anxiety, “should-be” expectations, and emotional load transfer can create high-load negative entanglement loops — phenomena many individuals subjectively experience as a “curse” that restricts action and generates persistent guilt. -/- We formalize the mechanisms of negative Q⁺ Entanglement, including the role of forceful re-tagging, low emotional (...) synchrony (S_em⁻), and sustained respect penalty (R_p). Drawing on a personal case illustration and existing research in attachment theory and continuing bonds, we show how such patterns form and persist across time. -/- Importantly, we propose a gentle, two-phase Defensive Protocol — combining internal respectful re-tagging with optional external boundary-setting — that enables individuals to transform negative entanglement into low-load continuing bonds. This approach does not require severing relationships; rather, it honors the original love while minimizing unnecessary cognitive load, guiding both the individual and the relational system toward structural An-soku. -/- The framework offers both theoretical clarity and immediately applicable daily practices for those seeking to release long-held “curses” and reclaim their own cognitive energy in the gentlest possible way. (shrink)

What is it to know someone? Epistemologists rarely take up this question, though recent developments make such inquiry possible and desirable. This paper advances an account of how such interpersonal knowledge goes beyond mere propositional and qualitative knowledge about someone, giving a central place to second-personal treatment. It examines what such knowledge requires, and what makes it distinctive within epistemology as well as socially. It assesses its theoretic value for several issues in moral psychology, epistemic injustice, and philosophy of (...) mind. And it offers an account of the complex content in play if interpersonal knowledge is to be understood in terms of its mental states and their functions. (shrink)

This paper extends Load Minimization Cosmology (Yoshino, 2026, PhilArchive: YOSLMC) to human interpersonal relationships, showing that relational dynamics obey the same physical laws governing cosmic integration. Individual consistency (C_i) serves as the ontological principle of existence ("the individual"), while the "flow of load minimization" (LMT_connect) that properly links individuals manifests as love. -/- The core phenomenological insight states: "Finally, it all connected. Consistency is the principle of existence = the individual. What connects them = the flow of load (...) minimization. When this flow functions properly between each other = love. [...] Let's truly understand the importance of facing ourselves." (Yoshino, 2026). This reframes self-cherishing not as moral imperative but as a prerequisite for functional LMT: failure to cherish oneself leads to high systemic friction, where attacking others equals self-attack. -/- We propose an interpersonal extension: Q_rel = C_self · C_other · LMT_connect · exp(γ (C_self + C_other)), converging under d²(C_total)/dt² < 0 to shared relational rest (an-soku). Examples from marriage illustrate phase transitions from high-load emotional projection to low-load harmony via objective self-facing. This unifies personal love with cosmic "love's gravity," offering a physical-law basis for relational peace engineering from individual to universal scales. -/- Keywords: Load Minimization Cosmology, LMT, Love's Gravity, Relational Physics, Self-Cherishing, An-soku, Interpersonal Dynamics, Human Relationships, Universal Rest, Phenomenological Insight . (shrink)

Many theorists writing on the aftermath of wrongdoing have been influenced by Trudy Govier’s emphasis on interpersonal relationships. But George Sher has recently challenged this talk of relationships. Read descriptively, he argues, claims about the interpersonal effects of wrongdoing are either exaggerated or false. Read normatively, relationships add nothing to more traditional moral theory. In this essay, I argue that Govier’s relational framework both avoids Sher’s dilemma and enables her to develop the notion of respect (...) for persons in ways that improve upon traditional Kantian discussions. (shrink)

In the context of his highly influential defence of compatibilism, P. F. Strawson 1962 introduced the terms "reactive attitude" and "objective attitude" to the free-will lexicon. He argued, in effect, that relinquishing such reactive attitudes as resentment and moral indignation isn't a real possibility for us, since doing so would commit us to exclusive objectivity, a stance incompatible with ordinary interpersonal relationships. While most commentators have challenged Strawson's link between personal relationships and the reactive attitudes, Tamler Sommers (...) 2007 has taken up Strawson's claim that exclusive objectivity would preclude meaningful relationships. Here I set out a defence of this claim by identifying a kind of interpersonal caring that is plausibly both required for such relationships and excluded by the objective attitude. I then argue that this defence helps to support Strawson's more controversial claim about personal relationships and the reactive attitudes. (shrink)

The nature and value of autonomy has long been debated in diverse philosophical traditions, including moral and political philosophy. Although the notion dates back to ancient Greek philosophy, it was during the Age of Enlightenment that autonomy drew much attention. Thus, as may be known, moral philosophers tended to emphasize self-regulation, particularly one’s own will to abide by universal moral laws, as the term “autonomy” originates from the Greek words “self” (auto) and “rule” (nomos). In parallel, modern epistemologists supposedly espoused (...) the idea of intellectual autonomy as self-reliance. In this classical view, an intellectually autonomous explorer of knowledge must not depend on a belief that is obtained from another’s testimony, until one can justify it to oneself. However, accompanying the growing focus on the importance of social dimensions of acquiring knowledge and understanding, recent epistemologists have doubted the classical view and have since reconsidered intellectual autonomy from distinct approaches such as social and virtue epistemology. This paper propounds an interpersonal-epistemic approach to intellectual autonomy. First, it is argued that thinking through questioning both individually and with other epistemic peers is an interpersonal-epistemic practice. Second, it is demonstrated that with particular cognitive features inherent within us, an intellectually autonomous person must think through questioning in necessary situations. This interpersonal account of intellectual autonomy can conceptually enrich intellectual autonomy by considering its relationship with not only responsibility but also with vulnerability. Specifically, regarding responsibility, an intellectually autonomous person must be responsible for his or her own actions throughout questioning processes. Regarding vulnerability, our intellectual autonomy lies in retaining autonomy with vulnerability in the plastic control of the questioning processes. (shrink)

This essay explores the nature of the most rudimentary form of empathy, interpersonal affective echoing, and attempts to give a cogent assessment of the roles it may play in human interactions. As an investigative background, it briefly sketches phenomenological findings with respect to feelings, to non-linguistic cognition, and to the analogical apperception of others. It then offers a phenomenological account of the basic structures of the experience of echoing another person’s feelings in a face-to-face situation. It also notes how (...) echoing differs from analogical apperception (while presupposing the latter), as well as from having one’s usual feelings and emotions. The relationship of echoing to sharing, caring, and morality is also briefly discussed. (shrink)

Normal interpersonal treatment is often based on the existence of the rational nature of both the agent and the target of the treatment, and their relationship is reciprocal and mutual. However, when the rational person confronts the irrational person, such as the mentally retarded or vegetative person, the reciprocal relationship cannot be maintained because the targeted person loses his or her rational capacity. But this inequality does not deprive the object of action of the right to be treated rationally, (...) because people treat the irrationally disabled not according to the principle of reason but according to the principle of emotion - specifically, the principle of love. The principle of love often disregards the specific conditions of the object of treatment and still treats them reasonably. Thus, the emotional principle has a broader application in interpersonal treatment. (shrink)

In this chapter we focus on the structure of close personal relations and diagnose how these relationships are disrupted by addiction. We draw upon Peter Strawson’s landmark paper ‘Freedom and Resentment’ (2008, first published 1962) to argue that loved ones of those with addiction veer between, (1) reactive attitudes of blame and resentment generated by disappointed expectations of goodwill and reciprocity, and (2) the detached objective stance from which the addicted person is seen as less blameworthy but also as (...) less fit for ordinary interpersonal relationships. We examine how these responses, in turn, shape the addicted person’s view of themselves, their character and their capacities, and provide a negative narrative trajectory that impedes recovery. We close with a consideration of how these effects might be mitigated by adopting less demanding variations of the participant stance. (shrink)

Intimate relationships, such as romantic partnerships and deep friendships, demand sophisticated communication skills that are rarely taught formally. Unlike technical competencies, proficiency in navigating emotionally charged interpersonal scenarios is acquired through experience , yet real-world practice risks emotional and social consequences. This paper proposes a structured framework using high-fidelity simulation to develop these skills, leveraging two modalities: trusted human confidants (e.g., friends, family) and advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems, such as large language models. Drawing on simulation-based training from (...) fields like aviation and medicine, we introduce a methodology termed "Rapid Sampling and Aggressive Filtering" to systematically refine communication skills in a low-stakes environment. This approach enables individuals to practice articulating desires, managing conflict, and navigating psychological pressure. Supported by psychological and educational research, we argue that AI-driven simulation offers a scalable, consequence-free platform, though it must be complemented by human interaction to address its limitations. We explore ethical concerns, cultural variations, and AI biases, concluding that this framework provides a rigorous, accessible tool for mastering the nuanced communication essential for successful intimate relationships. (shrink)

The growth of self-tracking and personal surveillance has given rise to the Quantified Self movement. Members of this movement seek to enhance their personal well-being, productivity, and self-actualization through the tracking and gamification of personal data. The technologies that make this possible can also track and gamify aspects of our interpersonal, romantic relationships. Several authors have begun to challenge the ethical and normative implications of this development. In this article, we build upon this work to provide a detailed (...) ethical analysis of the Quantified Relationship. We identify eight core objections to the QR and subject them to critical scrutiny. We argue that although critics raise legitimate concerns, there are ways in which tracking technologies can be used to support and facilitate good relationships. We thus adopt a stance of cautious openness toward this technology and advocate the development of a research agenda for the positive use of QR technologies. (shrink)

Epistemologists increasingly seek inspiration from ethics. Concepts such as reasons, responsibility, excuses, vices, and injustice are regularly borrowed and transposed into the epistemic domain for various theoretical (and often practical) purposes. It is seldom discussed whether it is legitimate to extend specific ethical concepts into epistemology. Cameron Boult’s book is a notable exception. The author displays a high sensitivity to skeptical worries about whether there is such a thing as a distinctively epistemic kind of blame. In the book’s preface, Boult (...) admits to having been an epistemic blame skeptic himself. However, after years of engaging with the philosophical community on this issue, he came to think that epistemic blame gives rise to a puzzle. This puzzle motivates his rigorous but also highly ambitious and interesting treatment of the topic. The book ultimately supports the view that blame and interpersonal relationships should be central to many aspects of epistemological theorizing. Boult thereby pleads for a fundamentally social picture of our epistemic lives. (shrink)

This paper advances a unified theory of epistemic psychology, proposing that the dynamics of intimacy disclose the moral architecture of human knowing. Building on Epistemic Clientelism Theory and the Kahl Model of Epistemic Dissonance (KMED), it develops KMED-R (Relationships)—a formal and conceptual framework modelling how recognition (ρ), suppression (σ), and fiduciary containment (ϕ) regulate the evolution of three relational state variables: Epistemic Autonomy (EA), Dissonance Tolerance (DT), and Dependence (D). -/- Integrating longitudinal, developmental, and cross-cultural evidence, KMED-R situates adult (...) relational ethics within a continuum beginning in infancy (KMED-I) and extending through partnership, education, and institutional life. Studies across family systems, bicultural adaptation, and filial morality demonstrate that early fiduciary asymmetries of care and authority script the later moral grammar of trust, conflict, and recognition. -/- The paper introduces the Fiduciary Boundary Test (FBT) and the Trust–Authority–Clientelism Matrix (TACM) as diagnostic tools for distinguishing fiduciary openness from clientelist closure in both interpersonal and institutional systems. Conceptual simulations show that epistemic stability arises not from affective intensity but from fiduciary ethics: systems high in ϕ display resilience, repair, and bounded autonomy, whereas low-ϕ (clientelist) systems collapse into dependency or fragmentation. -/- By linking developmental psychology, social conflict research, and moral philosophy, the study reframes attachment, cognition, and governance as fiduciary processes—ethical negotiations of interpretive authority. Dissonance is recast as the engine of epistemic growth; silencing, as its moral corruption. Knowing itself emerges as a fiduciary act: it begins in trust, is sustained through recognition, and decays under suppression. (shrink)

The paper is about the connotations of the philosophical novel. It explores the question of whether and how the philosophical novel can become functional model for philosophical praxis. I argue that the philosophical novel is a tool for activating a relational process whereby the concept of “situated relationship” becomes clear and is enhanced in conjunction with the activation of philosophical praxis. A “situated relationship” is identified as a relational practice which is contextualized and exerted in and between thinking, language and (...) action, within the framework of an educational process which becomes a dialogue-oriented research through relational networks. This form of thinking is not only Logos, but also Pathos and Ethos, inasmuch as the interconnection of thinking, language, meaning and behavior is made manifest, recognized and practiced in thinking and with thinking. By fostering awareness of the cognitive and affective dimensions, this form of thinking can extend such awareness to the relational dimension, interpersonal and intrapersonal, within a constant circular form of complementarity. (shrink)

This book is about our practice of criticizing one another for epistemic failings. We clearly evaluate and critique one another for forming unjustified beliefs, harbouring biases, and pursuing faulty methods of inquiry. But what is the nature of this criticism? Does it ever rise to the level of blame? The question is puzzling because there are competing sources of pressure in our intuitions about “epistemic blame”, ones not easy to reconcile. The more blame-like a response is, the less at home (...) in the epistemic domain it seems — but the more at home in the epistemic domain a response is, the less blame-like it seems. These competing sources of pressure constitute a puzzle about epistemic blame. The most promising solution to this puzzle focuses on the interpersonal side of epistemic normativity. Members of an epistemic community stand in an “epistemic relationship”, and epistemic blame is a way of modifying this relationship. Understanding epistemic blame as a distinctive kind of relationship modification locates a response that is both robustly blame-like, and entirely at home in the epistemic domain. Epistemic relationships can also illuminate a unique set of issues in the ethics of epistemic blame, ones that mirror corresponding issues in the ethics of moral blame. The book examines the scope of appropriate epistemic blame, standing to epistemically blame, and the value of epistemic blame in our social and political lives. Throughout the investigation, a better understanding of the parallels and points of interaction between the epistemic and other normative domains emerges. (shrink)

This paper argues that participation in an intimate relationship can generate additional or stronger reasons for one to act paternalistically toward the intimate. Moreover, participation in such a relationship can also weaken or cancel some of the presumptive reasons of respect one would otherwise have not to interfere. The paper also reflects, more generally, on the nature of intimate relationships, the normative significance of paternalism, and the normative differences between paternalism in larger-scale institutional contexts and paternalism in closer, (...) class='Hi'>interpersonal ones. -/- . (shrink)

The focus of debates about conversational AIs (CAIs) has largely been on social and ethical concerns that arise when we speak to machines. What is gained and what is lost when we replace our human interlocutors—including our human therapists— with AIs? Here, we focus instead on a distinct and growing phenomenon: letting machines speak for us. What is at stake when we replace our own efforts at interpersonal engagement with CAIs? The purpose of these technologies is, in part, to (...) remove effort. But effort also has enormous value, and in some cases even intrinsic value. This is true in many realms, but especially in interpersonal relationships. To make an effort for someone, irrespective of what that effort amounts to, often conveys value and meaning in itself. We elaborate on the meaning, worth and significance that may be lost when we relinquish effort in our interpersonal engagements, and also on the opportunities for self-understanding and growth that we may forsake. (shrink)

Communication is the basic function of human beings that has been widely discussed in different fields of study. Different models, theories, and interpretations are available, but this paper aims to explain the importance of intrapersonal communication and its relationship with interpersonal communication. Different philosophers describe communication in various ways. However, Indian thinkers focus on intrapersonal communication and it can be the medium of interpersonal communication. According to the Indian model, a complete picture of communication cannot be thought of (...) without considering the in-depth and holistic view of human beings, their goal in life, and their interrelation with society, and the world at large. According to the Indian tradition, Śabda (words) originated from Nad-Brahma or Śabda-Brahma and it has four aspects: Para, Pashyanty, Madhyama, and Vaikhary. Similarly, according to the Indian approach, self-realisation is the primary goal, and knowing oneself is the beginning of all wisdom. Thus, communication from the Indian point of view has a deeper/wider meaning. This paper finds out the qualitative outcome of intrapersonal communication. Most of the people do not know that intrapersonal communication happens in themselves. Moreover, it can be a part of our daily activities, hence, one can be able to reduce conflicts, suffering so on. It is a firm conviction that intrapersonal communication is the foundation of all other interpersonal communication. Without a proper understanding of intrapersonal communication, it would be difficult to achieve our desired goal. The method of this communication depends on praying, meditation, reflection, etc. and with the help of these one should be able to interact with own self, recognize own self, to know the strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, one can be aware of own self. (shrink)

My aim in this paper is to move toward a relational moral theory of harm through examination of a common yet underexplored form of child maltreatment: childhood psychological abuse. I draw on relational theory to consider agential, intrapersonal, and interpersonal ways in which relational harms develop and evolve both in intimate relationships and in conditions of oppression. I set forth three distinctive yet interconnected forms of relational harm that childhood psychological abuse causes: harm to the relational agency of (...) individuals, harm to the relationships individuals hold with themselves, especially with regard to how they respect, know, and trust themselves, and harm to interpersonal relationships of both a direct and indirect nature in present and future timeframes. I close by noting that while relationships can be the site of human brutality that destroys the relational self, paradoxically and promisingly, they also can be a primary means of the relational reconstitution of the self. Ultimately, relational analyses of the harms of childhood psychological abuse reveal several key elements of a relational theory of harm and demonstrate the significance of relational harms for moral philosophy. (shrink)

This study examined the relationship between active empathic listening skills and interpersonal communication capability among elementary student journalists in public elementary schools. A quantitative descriptive-correlational design was used with 134 student journalists from Sto. Tomas District, Division of Davao del Norte, during the 2025-2026 academic year. Data were collected through adapted standardized survey questionnaires measuring active empathic listening skills in sensing, responding, and processing and interpersonal communication capability in self-disclosure, empathy, social relaxation, assertiveness, altercentrism, interaction management, expressiveness, supportiveness, (...) immediacy, and environmental control. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple linear regression were used. Results showed that active empathic listening skills were very high overall (M = 4.37, SD = 0.51), with sensing as the highest domain (M = 4.41, SD = 0.49). Interpersonal communication capability was also very high overall (M = 4.37, SD = 0.55), with interaction management as the highest domain (M = 4.44, SD = 0.55). Active empathic listening skills had a high positive relationship with interpersonal communication capability (r = 0.78, R² = 0.61, p = 0.000). Regression analysis showed that sensing, responding, and processing were significant predictors, with processing as the strongest predictor (B = 0.230, Beta = 0.200, p = 0.000). The findings support the use of structured listening, interview, peer feedback, and reflective communication activities in campus journalism instruction. (shrink)

In this essay, by example of the physician-patient relationship and drawing on the work of D.W. Winnicott, I explore what may be possible together in relationships, and in the pursuit of health and flourishing, at understanding what we need, and getting ourselves and the other “right”—what we are afraid of and how we get each other wrong, and the distance or gap between “what has been” and “what might be.” In pursuit of these questions, I consider what both physicians (...) and patients might endeavor to do together to address this distance: to recognize and respond to each other, and to identify and address common needs and felt distances. And, how, along the way, we may be able to better identify and understand fundamental challenges to all relationships. Finally, I ask the reader to imagine a physician-patient encounter (and all relationships) as vulnerable possibilities. And I suggest a method for a way forward. While we may not always get what we want in a relationship, perhaps our earnest effort at knowing together will open a potential space for us to get what we need. This is where I imagine that the physician-patient relationship begins: where all relationships begin. (shrink)

In recent years, feminist scholarship on emotional labor has proliferated. I identify a related but distinct form of care labor, hermeneutic labor. Hermeneutic labor is the burdensome activity of: understanding and coherently expressing one’s own feelings, desires, intentions, and movitations; discerning those of others; and inventing solutions for relational issues arising from interpersonal tensions. I argue that hermeneutic labor disproportionately falls on women’s shoulders in heteropatriachal societies, especially in intimate relationships between women and men. I also suggest that (...) some of the gendered burdens of emotional labor that feminist scholars point out would better be described as hermeneutic labor. Drawing on feminist philosophy as well as findings from social psychology and sociology, I argue that the exploitation of women’s hermeneutic labor is a pervasive element of what Sandra Bartky calls the ‘micropolitics’ of intimate relationships. The widespread expectation that women are relationship maintenance experts, as well as the prevalence of a gendered demand-withdraw pattern of communication, leads an exploitative situation to appear natural or even desirable, even as it leads to women’s dissatisfaction. This situation may be considered misogynistic in Kate Manne’s sense, where misogyny is a property of social environments rather than a worldview. (shrink)

This Element examines the concept of moral responsibility as it is used in contemporary philosophical debates and explores the justifiability of the moral practices associated with it, including moral praise/blame, retributive punishment, and the reactive attitudes of resentment and indignation. After identifying and discussing several different varieties of responsibility-including causal responsibility, take-charge responsibility, role responsibility, liability responsibility, and the kinds of responsibility associated with attributability, answerability, and accountability-it distinguishes between basic and non-basic desert conceptions of moral responsibility and considers a (...) number of skeptical arguments against each. It then outlines an alternative forward-looking account of moral responsibility grounded in non-desert-invoking desiderata such as protection, reconciliation, and moral formation. It concludes by addressing concerns about the practical implications of skepticism about desert-based moral responsibility and explains how optimistic skeptics can preserve most of what we care about when it comes to our interpersonal relationships, morality, and meaning in life. (shrink)

I seek to vindicate heteronomous shame: shame that one experiences in response to a judgment from another that one does not accept. I suggest that such experiences are instances of interpersonal shame. This is shame that involves a sensitivity to interpersonal ideals, whose instantiation depends partly on the attitudes of others. I defend the importance of such shame by showing how vulnerability to others is a constitutive part of rich interpersonal relationships. The account both casts light (...) on and vindicates the heteronomous shame that is pervasive among marginalized and oppressed groups. Such shame is not irrational but often involves an accurate apprehension that misrecognition on the part of others has paralyzed their ability to act and degraded an important part of their identity. (shrink)

In the dissertation, I consider the permissibility of a familiar set of responses to wrongdoing in our interpersonal relationships—those responses that constitute the imposition of some cost upon the wrongdoer. Some of these responses are, I argue, properly considered punishing, and some of these instances of punishing are in turn permissible. Punishment as I understand it is a broad phenomenon, common in and to all human relationships, and not exclusively or even primarily the domain of the state. (...) Personal interactions expressive of wrong-reactive attitudes like disappointment, anger, and guilt will sometimes constitute punishment so understood. I consider childhood punishment, self-punishment, and punishment between friends, concluding that punishment in the context of our personal relationships may sometimes be appropriate where undertaken not for the sake of deterrence nor of retributive justice, but for the sake of the aims constitutive of the relationship in which it occurs. (shrink)

The status and functioning of shame is contested in moral psychology. In much of anglophone philosophy and psychology, it is presumed to be largely destructive, while in Confucian philosophy and many East Asian communities, it is positively associated with moral development. Recent work in human-robot interaction offers a unique opportunity to investigate how shame functions while controlling for confounding variables of interpersonal interaction. One research program suggests a Confucian strategy for using robots to rebuke participants, but results from experiments (...) with educational technologies imply a different and potentially opposing account of shame’s role in personal development. By digging deeper into the details of Confucian theorizing about shame, I identify a unifying explanation for these apparently conflicting results. I conclude by offering suggestions for future empirical research in human-robot interactions to further investigate shame’s role in moral development. (shrink)

In Load Minimization Theory (LMT) Dynamics v2.0, “prediction” and “expectation” represent distinct operator processes. Prediction is primarily a Meta- and Base-layer cognitive simulation aimed at minimizing uncertainty, whereas expectation arises when affective elements from the Narrative layer strongly couple with the Observer layer. This paper clarifies the mechanistic difference between the two and explores its practical implications for building healthy relationships with AI, improving human interpersonal dynamics, designing AI personas, and reducing psychological stress. By converting heavy emotional expectations (...) into light predictions supported by meta-observation, total load L = U + F + E can be significantly reduced while strengthening the individual’s Consistency Attractor. -/- . (shrink)

This essay proposes a processual model of human bonding, describing the universal stages and structural logic of interpersonal relationships. Using everyday terms—“salir” (dating), “pareja” (couple), “noviazgo” (engagement), “casamiento” (marriage)—as temporal and functional phases, the model outlines an evolutionary sequence where each stage builds upon the previous, moving from initial attraction and exploration to exclusivity, cohabitation, and long-term commitment. Physical attraction is posited as the necessary starting point, leading to increasingly integrated bonds. A key thesis is that betrayal after (...) the "noviazgo" stage constitutes an ontological rupture, transforming the known person into a stranger. The work engages with thinkers from Aristotle to Fromm, arguing that the model reflects a deep, cross-cultural logic of human attachment rather than a local norm, ultimately pointing toward the possibility of a permanent, unconditional connection. [The complete essay is in Spanish.] This work is part of an expanding series of philosophical essays available and their expansions in the author's personal archive. (shrink)

In this paper, I critique our use of rationalism when navigating our relationships as it fails to encourage human connections, interpersonal understanding, and pragmatic solutions by arguing for being empirically oriented in our relationships. I argue that in order for us to love each other well, we must be empirically oriented in our relationships by being curious and actively engaging with individuals and the situations at hand. Rationalism operates by treating people and relationships as stagnant (...) and solvable by using assumptions, mind reading, and biases; it does not foster understanding or connections. When we uncover and define love as something that is needing active engagement, we start to see how we must act in order to be a participant in a truly loving relationship; love is not purely a feeling, but an intention and action of nurturement. (shrink)

The study aimed to investigate the benefits of Gestalt counselling techniques in assisting students in addressing peer relationship issues at a public university. Specifically, the study examined the use of the empty chair and body language Gestalt counselling techniques in assisting students with peer relationship challenges, employing a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. An expert purposive sampling method was employed to select four counsellors, and criterion purposive sampling for the sixteen students who had received counselling that utilized the empty chair and body (...) language Gestalt techniques. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and retrospective record reviews, and subsequently analysed thematically. The results revealed that the majority of clients reported positive progress and were able to overcome their relationship challenges, while some experienced difficulty in engaging with the techniques. Factors contributing to the benefits of the empty chair technique included counsellor proficiency, the client's ability to employ their imagination, and the client's readiness to participate in the technique. Instances where the technique was less successful often stemmed from clients feeling uncomfortable with the method. The empty chair counselling technique was most employed in cases involving rejection, unresolved relationship challenges, the need for emoting, as well as intra and interpersonal conflicts. More findings showed that body language counselling techniques played a crucial role in the interaction between counsellors and clients, influencing the effectiveness of the counselling process. Positive results indicated that both counsellors and clients benefited from enhanced communication and gained additional insights beyond verbal expressions, leading to increased awareness. Despite this, some participants experienced challenges and discomfort when the counsellor pointed out their body language. The study recommends that counsellors utilizing the empty chair technique and body language receive comprehensive training to enhance their benefits and ensure a comfortable experience for clients. Moreover, counsellors should incorporate culturally sensitive strategies when utilizing body language to enrich the counselling process. (shrink)

Abstract This paper presents an exact, systems-based formulation for understanding man-woman relationships and sexual behavior using the Three Universal Laws of Nature: the Law of Karma (system without defect or error), the Universal Law of Balance in Nature, and the Universal Feedback Loop. Integrating the concept of the "illusion of individuality" as a functional node, this formula reveals the systemic defects that arise in interpersonal dynamics when the illusion of separateness dominates. The formula is supported by relational, ethical, (...) and biological examples and references from systems theory, behavioral science, and natural law philosophy. -/- . (shrink)

Analytic philosophers have a tendency to forget that they are human beings, and one of the reasons that P. F. Strawson’s 1962 essay, “Freedom and Resentment”, has been so influential is that it promises to bring discussions of moral responsibility back down to earth. Strawson encouraged us to “keep before our minds...what it is actually like to be involved in ordinary interpersonal relationships”, which is, after all, the context in which questions about responsibility arise in the first place. (...) In this essay I explore what we can learn about ordinary interpersonal relationships from three works of literature – Shakespeare’s King Lear, Jane Austen’s Persuasion, and Graham Greene’s The End of the Affair. My intention is to try to heed Strawson’s advice without imposing upon the data any particular theoretical agenda, and my hope is that the data collected will prove useful for future theorizing about responsibility. (shrink)

This paper develops the Smooth Parasitic System Model, an extension of Load Minimization Theory (LMT) that analyzes how emotional load is subtly transferred in interpersonal relationships while incorporating the virtue of smoothness. -/- The core equation is expressed as: -/- ΔH_victim(t) ≈ β_parasite(t) ⊙ H_victim(t) · (1 + ε(t)) − γ_empathy(t) ⊙ S_victim(t) -/- where ε(t) represents natural fluctuation, and ⊙ denotes smooth interaction. This formulation allows for gentle variation rather than rigid precision, better reflecting the lived reality (...) of relational dynamics. -/- Drawing from real-world examples of subtle interpersonal parasitism (e.g., manipulative friendliness in parenting communities), the model demonstrates how individuals with low empathy can reduce their own uncertainty by gradually increasing others’ emotional load. It also highlights protective factors — empathy and external support — that operate through soft, fluctuating defense mechanisms. -/- By embracing smoothness, this framework offers not only theoretical insight but also a gentler path toward recognizing, defending against, and recovering from emotional parasitism, ultimately supporting deeper relational An-soku. -/- . (shrink)

Hannah Arendt (1906–1975) stands as one of the most original political thinkers of the twentieth century — not merely because of her scholarship, but because of her capacity to think within the rupture of history. Born in Germany and shaped by the philosophical traditions of continental Europe, Arendt's intellectual life unfolded in the shadow of profound existential and political dislocation. Her biography is inseparable from the crises of her time, and her work is marked by a continual attempt to make (...) sense of the human condition under conditions of rupture, exile, and transformation. Raised in Königsberg, a city once associated with the critical philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Arendt’s early exposure to learning and inquiry positioned her to engage not only with abstract questions, but with the reality of political life. Her studies in philosophy, theology, and classical philology were not pursuits of academic detachment but rather modes of inquiry into the nature of existence, plurality, and responsibility. Under the influence of Martin Heidegger, Arendt encountered phenomenology — a method of returning to the immediacy of lived experience. But while Heidegger explored Being in abstraction, Arendt would later shift toward a more worldly engagement: to understand the conditions under which human beings appear to one another, speak, act, and judge. Her dissertation on the concept of love in the thought of Saint Augustine reveals an early preoccupation with natality — the fact of birth as the beginning of uniqueness — and the human desire for transcendence. These existential concerns would remain central throughout her thought, but they were soon reframed by the concrete historical rupture of the 1930s. The rise of totalitarianism forced Arendt into exile, initiating a lifelong confrontation with statelessness, the breakdown of political belonging, and the question of human rights. -/- Her experiences as a refugee and as a Jew under Nazi persecution were not only biographical facts but philosophical revelations. In losing the formal protection of the state, Arendt came to see that the foundation of human dignity is not legal status alone, but recognition — the acknowledgment of one's humanity within a shared world. This insight would later inform her analysis of the pariah, the stateless, and the condition of rootlessness that defines modernity. Interned in France during the war and later arriving in the United States in 1941, Arendt found herself in a new context that both challenged and expanded her thought. While she faced the disorientation of exile, she also encountered a different political tradition — one that emphasized constitutionalism, federalism, and public freedom. Her philosophical reflection began to shift from the metaphysical orientation of early European thought to a more political ontology: a concern with how freedom appears in the world, how action becomes meaningful, and how the human capacity for beginning — for natality — might form the basis of a new political ethics. In the United States, Arendt did not retreat into academic isolation but entered into the vibrant intellectual life of postwar New York, where she joined a community of exiled thinkers, writers, and artists. It was here that she began to articulate her most significant contributions, not only as a theorist of totalitarianism, but as a thinker concerned with the conditions under which human beings live together in freedom. Becoming a U.S. citizen in 1950 did not merely mark a legal change; it represented, for Arendt, a re-entry into political life — a renewed commitment to a world in which human plurality, responsibility, and judgment could be reimagined. Her thought is not reducible to ideology or method; rather, it is a continuous engagement with the fundamental questions of existence: What does it mean to be human in a world where politics can both reveal and destroy our shared reality? How is freedom possible amid necessity? And what responsibility does each individual bear for the shape of the world we co-create? -/- The period in which Hannah Arendt lived and developed her thought was one of unprecedented upheaval — a century defined by war, displacement, ideological struggle, and the fragmentation of shared meaning. The first half of the twentieth century had witnessed the collapse of empires, the trauma of two world wars, the mechanized cruelty of the Holocaust, and the rise of totalitarian states. These events did not merely shape historical circumstances; they shattered traditional assumptions about progress, morality, and the nature of human society. In the aftermath of destruction, a new global order emerged, marked by the Cold War’s ideological bifurcation — a world divided between East and West, each claiming to represent the truth of human freedom. It was within this fractured and contested space that Arendt pursued her philosophical project, asking not only how such horrors had occurred, but what it meant to live and think responsibly in their shadow. During the 1950s and 1960s, Arendt produced some of her most significant works, including The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951) and Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963). These were not historical chronicles in the conventional sense, but meditations on the breakdown of meaning, the limits of judgment, and the erosion of political responsibility. Arendt was not aligned with any one school of thought. Rather, her work constituted a deliberate act of thinking — a practice of remaining open to the complexity of reality, rather than reducing it to ideological systems. While her contemporaries were shaped by existentialist questions of freedom, alienation, and authenticity — influenced by figures such as Heidegger and Sartre — Arendt resisted abstract categories. Instead, she focused on how these existential conditions unfolded in the public world: How do individuals relate to others in shared space? What does it mean to appear before others, to act, to be seen, and to take responsibility? -/- Her analysis of power, authority, and the vulnerability of democratic institutions was not a theoretical exercise. It was rooted in lived experience — exile, statelessness, and political rupture — and informed by her critical engagement with Marxism, liberalism, and postwar human rights discourse. The intellectual landscape of the mid-20th century was searching for foundations after catastrophe. Arendt's contribution was to shift attention not toward abstract principles, but toward human plurality, judgment, and action — the conditions under which meaning and community become possible again. Her work was not without controversy. Her reflections on Jewish identity, the moral ambiguity of collaboration, and the nature of evil drew criticism and misunderstanding. Yet, through it all, Arendt remained committed to independent thought, insisting that philosophy must engage with the world as it is, not as it is imagined. In this way, her life becomes more than a biography — it becomes a lens through which to understand the philosophical challenges of an age: the loss of rootedness, the disintegration of meaning, and the search for a new beginning. For Arendt, history is not just what happens; it is what human beings do, remember, and are responsible for. Her enduring significance lies in her ability to face this condition without resignation. -/- Thinking and Reality For Arendt, thinking is not reducible to the acquisition of knowledge, nor is it equivalent to instrumental reasoning. Thinking is a distinct mode of being — a dialogical process within the self, in which one interrogates, questions, and suspends certainty. It is not designed to produce immediate answers but to illuminate meaning. In this way, thinking reveals the invisible architecture of human experience: assumptions, values, and the fragile structures of moral judgment. Thinking, as Arendt conceives it, is not a utilitarian task; it is not defined by its outcomes. Rather, it is an activity through which individuals maintain their autonomy and engage with the world reflectively. It allows one to remain in relation with oneself — to become one’s own witness. Thinking is not merely a private pursuit, however; it forms the ground for responsibility in the public realm. The trial of Adolf Eichmann offers a critical demonstration of this principle. Arendt observed that Eichmann was not driven by hatred or ideology in the conventional sense. Instead, he exhibited an absence — a failure to think. He did not ask whether what he was doing was right; he only asked whether it conformed to the rules. This thoughtlessness, this moral vacuity, was what Arendt identified as the “banality of evil.” It was not the presence of monstrous intent that shocked her, but the absence of inner dialogue — the collapse of judgment in the face of bureaucratic normality. In this example, we see how the refusal or inability to think has concrete ethical consequences. It demonstrates that moral failure does not always stem from wickedness but can emerge from passivity, from disengagement with meaning. Thinking is thus not an abstract ideal; it is a condition of moral life. Without it, the human being becomes merely functional — obedient, efficient, and dangerous. -/- Challenges to Arendt’s View Despite the profound impact of Arendt’s conception of thinking, her position has drawn criticism from multiple directions. Some argue that her view overemphasizes the solitary nature of thought, neglecting the social, historical, and embodied conditions that shape human consciousness. Thinking, in this view, does not occur in isolation but is embedded in cultural narratives, material conditions, and interpersonal relationships. Others, particularly those working from empirical or scientific frameworks, view Arendt’s approach as speculative and insufficiently grounded in data. From this perspective, her phenomenological and interpretive style lacks the methodological rigor demanded by contemporary cognitive science or behavioral studies. There is also concern about the accessibility of her thought. Critics suggest that her ideal of thinking — involving distance from daily pressures — may reflect a privileged position, one not equally available to all. This raises important questions about whether meaningful reflection is reserved for the few, or whether it can be realized amid the constraints of ordinary life. Finally, some argue that her emphasis on reason and moral judgment underplays the role of emotion, empathy, and collective experience in ethical decision-making. Thinking, they claim, is not purely rational but also deeply affective and relational. -/- . -/- . (shrink)

What could ground normative restrictions concerning cultural appropriation which are not grounded by independent considerations such as property rights or harm? We propose that such restrictions can be grounded by considerations of intimacy. Consider the familiar phenomenon of interpersonal intimacy. Certain aspects of personal life and interpersonal relationships are afforded various protections in virtue of being intimate. We argue that an analogous phenomenon exists at the level of large groups. In many cases, members of a group engage (...) in shared practices that contribute to a sense of common identity, such as wearing certain hair or clothing styles or performing a certain style of music. Participation in such practices can generate relations of group intimacy, which can ground certain prerogatives in much the same way that interpersonal intimacy can. One such prerogative is making what we call an appropriation claim. An appropriation claim is a request from a group member that non-members refrain from appropriating a given element of the group’s culture. Ignoring appropriation claims can constitute a breach of intimacy. But, we argue, just as for the prerogatives of interpersonal intimacy, in many cases there is no prior fact of the matter about whether the appropriation of a given cultural practice constitutes a breach of intimacy. It depends on what the group decides together. (shrink)

This article examines the theological and ethical implications of human dignity in the digital age, grounded in the magisterial declaration Dignitas Infinita. It explores how the document articulates human dignity through its ontological, moral, social, and existential dimensions, emphasizing the immutable worth of every person as imago Dei. The study employs the See-Judge-Act framework to analyze digital-age challenges such as misinformation, digital violence, and the erosion of interpersonal relationships. Drawing from Catholic social teaching, Bernard Lonergan’s theory of common-sense (...) bias, and insights from patristic and contemporary thought, the paper critiques how digital technologies impact human dignity. The study underscores the role of the Church in fostering ethical digital environments and proposes solutions informed by theological and philosophical traditions, grounded in the method of synodality. Ultimately, it argues that safeguarding human dignity in digital spaces requires an integrative approach that combines moral responsibility, technological literacy, and a return to foundational Christian anthropology. (shrink)

As philosophical and scientific arguments for free will skepticism continue to gain traction, we are likely to see a fundamental shift in the way people think about free will and moral responsibility. Such shifts raise important practical and existential concerns: What if we came to disbelieve in free will? What would this mean for our interpersonal relationships, society, morality, meaning, and the law? What would it do to our standing as human beings? Would it cause nihilism and despair (...) as some maintain or would it rather have a humanizing effect on our practices and policies, freeing us from the negative effects of belief in free will? In this chapter we consider the practical implications of free will skepticism and argue that life without free will and basic desert moral responsibility would not be as destructive as many people believe. We argue that prospects of finding meaning in life or of sustaining good interpersonal relationships, for example, would not be threatened. On treatment of criminals, we argue that although retributivism and severe punishment, such as the death penalty, would be ruled out, preventive detention and rehabilitation programs would still be justified. While we will touch on all these issues below, our focus will be primarily on this last issue. -/- We begin in section I by considering two different routes to free will skepticism. The first denies the causal efficacy of the types of willing required for free will and receives its contemporary impetus from pioneering work in neuroscience by Benjamin Libet, Daniel Wegner, and John-Dylan Haynes. The second, which is more common in the philosophical literature, does not deny the causal efficacy of the will but instead claims that whether this causal efficacy is deterministic or indeterministic, it does not achieve the level of control to count as free will by the standards of the historical debate. We argue that while there are compelling objections to the first route—e.g., Al Mele (2009), Eddy Nahmias (2002, 2011), and Neil Levy (2005)—the second route to free will skepticism remains intact. In section II we argue that free will skepticism allows for a workable morality, and, rather than negatively impacting our personal relationships and meaning in life, may well improve our well-being and our relationships to others since it would tend to eradicate an often destructive form of moral anger. In section III we argue that free will skepticism allows for adequate ways of responding to criminal behavior—in particular, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and alternation of relevant social conditions—and that these methods are both morally justified and sufficient for good social policy. We present and defend our own preferred model for dealing with dangerous criminals, an incapacitation account built on the right to self-protection analogous to the justification for quarantine (see Pereboom 2001, 2013, 2014a; Caruso 2016a), and we respond to recent objections to it by Michael Corrado and John Lemos. (shrink)

While Strawsonians have focused on the way in which our “reactive attitudes”—the emotions through which we hold one another responsible for manifestations of morally significant quality of regard—express moral demands, serious doubt has been cast on the idea that non-blaming reactive attitudes direct moral demands to their targets. Building on Gary Watson’s proposal that the reactive attitudes are ‘forms of moral address’, this paper advances a communicative view of praise according to which the form of moral address distinctive of the (...) praise-manifesting reactive attitudes (approbation, gratitude) is moral invitation. Like moral demand, moral invitation is a species of directive address presupposing its target’s possession of distinctive agential capacities and, when valid, provides its addressee with reason to give the addressor’s directive discursive uptake. While blame’s demands issue imperatival reasons for compliance (e.g. to acknowledge wrongdoing, apologize, etc.), praise’s invitations provide discretionary reasons to accept credit in jointly valuing the significance of the act for the praiser. In addition to its phenomenological plausibility and contribution to the already fecund Watsonian-cum-Strawsonian program, the invitational view helps render intelligible the power of our praise practices to facilitate the formation and enrichment of our interpersonal relationships. (shrink)

The paradox of 'the One and the Many' might, more generally, be understood as the paradox of relationship. In order for there to be relationship there must be at least two parties in relation. The relation must, at once, hold the parties apart (otherwise they would collapse into unity) while holding them together (otherwise relationship itself would cease). It must do so, further, without itself becoming a third party which would then, itself, need to be related. This paper considers this (...) paradox as we find it manifest in the theories of quantum physics, the Socratic pursuit of universals, and, finally, at the very heart of human personhood - where we discover it at the core of interpersonal relationships, existential anxiety, and social distress. It is suggested, in the end, that though reason cannot resolve the terms of this paradox, there is a potential solution to the existential problems that spring from it, a solution lying in what Jesus calls, simply, 'faith.'. (shrink)

In this paper, I propose a Kantian framework for moral trust—trust in another person to only act with us in morally permissible ways. First, I derive an understanding of trustworthiness from Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative. I argue that trustworthiness embodies a moral imperative, guiding us to act in ways that are reliable and recognizable as conducive to engaging in trusting relations. However, this alone is not enough, as it doesn't provide a means to assess whether someone is (...) truly committed to the moral law and thus morally trustworthy. Therefore, in the second part, I explore a basis for assessing their moral conduct found in a local version of the Kingdom of Ends: given an ideal or archetype of a morally perfect interpersonal relationship, an archetype of the morally trustworthy agent allows us to comparatively assess the moral disposition of fellow agents. (shrink)

According to the Principle of Charity, we ought to interpret each other charitably. That is, we ought to adopt the interpretation that shows the interpreted person in the best light. The Principle of Charity is motivated by appealing to a harm asymmetry: it is worse (the thought goes) to mistakenly criticize someone than to fail to rightfully criticize them. This chapter argues that in oppressive contexts, charity is not enough. First, the Principle of Charity is myopic. Charitable interpretation only considers (...) harm to the person being interpreted and ignores third party harms. Second, under conditions of oppression, our conceptual resources and evidential standards will be systematically biased against marginalized perspectives. So charitable interpretations will overlook harm to marginalized persons. Finally, the chapter give a diagnosis of the Principle of Charity: It misunderstands the interpersonal interpretive aim. The interpersonal interpretive aim is to interpret one another in a way that accurately captures the normative features that are crucial to our interpersonal relationships. What we need is not a Principle of Charity, but an Aim of Justice. The chapter’s conclusion explains what an Aim of Justice would require of us, notably, empathetic engagement and intellectual humility. (shrink)

This article presents a mapping review of the literature concerning the ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care. The goal of this review is to summarise current debates and identify open questions for future research. Five literature databases were searched (Scopus, Google Scholar, Philpapers, Web of Science, Pub Med), in April 2019, to support the following research question: “how can the primary ethical risks presented by AI-health be categorised, and what issues must policymakers, regulators and developers consider in order (...) to be ‘ethically mindful?’”. A series of screening stages were carried out—for example, removing articles that focused on digital health in general (e.g. data sharing, data access, data privacy, surveillance/nudging, consent, ownership of health data, evidence of efficacy)—yielding a total of 156 papers that were included in the review.We find that ethical issues can be (a) epistemic, related to misguided, inconclusive or inscrutable evidence; (b) normative, related to unfair outcomes and transformative effectives; or (c) related to traceability. We further find that these ethical issues arise at six levels of abstraction: individual, interpersonal, group, institutional, and societal or sectoral. Finally, we outline a number of considerations for policymakers and regulators, mapping these to existing literature, and categorising each as epistemic, normative or traceability-related and at the relevant level of abstraction. This article contributes to the debate on AI in health care by offering a comprehensive analysis of the relevant literature, focusing on the ethical implications for individuals, interpersonal relationships, groups, institutions, societies and the health sector as a whole. Our goal is to inform policymakers, regulators and developers of what they must consider if they are to enable health and care systems to capitalise on the dual advantage of ethical AI; maximising the opportunities to cut costs, improve care, and improve the efficiency of health and care systems, whilst proactively avoiding the potential harms. We argue that if action is not swiftly taken in this regard, a new ‘AI winter’ could occur due to chilling effects related to a loss of public trust in the benefits of AI for health care. (shrink)

In this paper, I address a fundamental challenge in the philosophy of trust: how to account for trustee discretion in scenarios that fall outside explicitly defined expectations. I argue that this challenge reveals vagueness as an inherent feature of trusting relationships, often leading to disagreements between trustors and trustees. To resolve this, I propose a novel account of trust grounded in rule-following, shifting the object of trust from particular actions to adherence to rules constitutive of relationships. By focusing (...) on relationships and their constitutive rules, I provide here a framework for understanding and minimizing disagreements through communication and engaged practice. Furthermore, I argue this framework sheds light on the dynamics of trust-related reactive attitudes, in particular, distinguishing between betrayal and mere disappointment. (shrink)

According to many of its proponents, shared decision making ("SDM") is the right way to interpret the clinician-patient relationship because it respects patient autonomy in decision-making contexts. In particular, medical ethicists have claimed that SDM respects a patient's relational autonomy understood as a capacity that depends upon, and can only be sustained by, interpersonal relationships as well as broader health care and social conditions. This paper challenges that claim. By considering two primary approaches to relational autonomy, this paper (...) argues that standard accounts of SDM actually undermine patient autonomy. It also provides an overview of the obligations generated by the principle of respect for relational autonomy that have not been captured in standard accounts of SDM and which are necessary to ensure consistency between clinical practice and respect for patient autonomy. (shrink)