The Independence Contradiction: Why "Mind-Independent Matter That Causes Mind" Is Self-Defeating

Abstract

Materialism asserts that matter exists independently of mind while also asserting that matter causally produces mind. This paper demonstrates that these two claims are not compatible. Independence means absence of connection. Causation is connection. The standard materialist defense invokes asymmetric temporal priority to dissolve the apparent contradiction, but this defense secretly requires external time as an unexamined premise. Since external time is itself an unjustified externalist assumption, the independence claim and the temporal assumption are mutually load-bearing, making the entire structure circular at the foundational level rather than merely at the evidential level already documented in Experiential Empiricism (Sergent, n.d., "The Three-Step Argument").

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-03-19

Downloads
84 (#133,244)

6 months
84 (#125,853)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?