Beyond the Matter Prejudice: Why Experiential Empiricism Vindicates Psychedelic Research and Expands the Scope of Empirical Inquiry

Abstract

Externalist frameworks (materialism, physicalism) systematically dismiss psychedelic experiences as epistemically inferior through circular reasoning: "real" is defined as possessing matter-like properties (stability, persistence, intersubjective accessibility), then drug-induced experiences are classified as "not real" because they lack these properties. This paper demonstrates that Experiential Empiricism (EE) dissolves this arbitrary hierarchy by treating all experiential limitation patterns as equally ontologically real while differing in their characteristics. Phenomena like "machine elves" exhibit intersubjective reproducibility within their contexts, making them legitimate empirical data rather than dismissible hallucinations. By removing the unjustified assumption that matter-like patterns constitute the gold standard for reality, EE enables genuine empirical investigation of psychedelics without the conceptual distortions that have plagued previous research. This framework reveals that externalism's "theory of everything" was always constrained to a narrow subset of experiential patterns, while EE encompasses the complete domain of possible empirical inquiry. The result is both epistemological correction and moral necessity: we stop conditioning people to distrust their primary experiential data in favor of unprovable abstractions.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-02-11

Downloads
177 (#123,289)

6 months
177 (#62,630)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?