An Analysis of Turing’s Criterion for ‘Thinking’

Philosophies 7 (6):124 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that Turing proposed a new approach to the concept of thinking, based on his claim that intelligence is an ‘emotional concept’; and that the response-dependence interpretation of Turing’s ‘criterion for “thinking”’ is a better fit with his writings than orthodox interpretations. The aim of this paper is to clarify the response-dependence interpretation, by addressing such questions as: What did Turing mean by the expression ‘emotional’? Is Turing’s criterion subjective? Are ‘emotional’ judgements decided by social consensus? Turing’s take on these issues impacts current philosophical debates on response-dependent concepts and on the nature of artificial intelligence.

Author's Profile

Diane Proudfoot
University of Canterbury

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-05

Downloads
316 (#112,199)

6 months
117 (#105,740)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?