Necessary Self-Intelligible Actuality, Divine Mind, and Divine Will

Abstract

This paper develops a placement-first argument from actual intelligible reality to necessary self-intelligible actuality. It argues that actuality and intelligibility cannot be treated as merely received all the way down, nor responsibly called brute or primitive without specifying their metaphysical placement. The central distinction is between finite profile and concrete obtaining: a determinate or even necessarily intelligible profile is not thereby actual. From this distinction, the paper argues that finite actual intelligible reality requires an unreceived source of actuality-intelligibility. It then develops the implications of this source as Divine Mind and Divine Will. Primary intelligibility cannot be merely truth-available to another, since there is no deeper interpretive field beyond the primary; it must be intrinsically self-disclosive. Likewise, finite contingent actuality cannot proceed from the necessary source by necessity without collapsing into necessary emanation, nor can it be finally brute while remaining received. The bridge from necessary self-intelligible actuality to finite contingent actuality is therefore intelligible and non-necessitated: will-shaped. The final section considers how this metaphysical result supplies a disciplined grammar for Nicene Trinitarian doctrine.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-07-05

Downloads
169 (#124,107)

6 months
169 (#66,609)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?