April 2024 - ruby-core - ml.ruby-lang.org

[ruby-core:112664] [Ruby master Bug#19473] can't be called from trap context (ThreadError) is too limiting
by Eregon (Benoit Daloze) 24 Jun '25

24 Jun '25

Issue #19473 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19473: can't be called from trap context (ThreadError) is too limiting https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19473 * Author: Eregon (Benoit Daloze) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Simple reproducer: ``` $ ruby -ve 'm=Mutex.new; trap(:HUP) { m.synchronize { p :OK } }; Process.kill :HUP, Process.pid; sleep 0.1' ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [x86_64-linux] -e:1:in `synchronize': can't be called from trap context (ThreadError) from -e:1:in `block in <main>' from -e:1:in `kill' from -e:1:in `<main>' ``` Expected behavior: ``` $ ruby -ve 'm=Mutex.new; trap(:HUP) { m.synchronize { p :OK } }; Process.kill :HUP, Process.pid; sleep 0.1' truffleruby 22.3.1, like ruby 3.0.3, GraalVM CE Native [x86_64-linux] :OK $ ruby -ve 'm=Mutex.new; trap(:HUP) { m.synchronize { p :OK } }; Process.kill :HUP, Process.pid; sleep 0.1' jruby 9.4.0.0 (3.1.0) 2022-11-23 95c0ec159f OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 17.0.6+10 on 17.0.6+10 +jit [x86_64-linux] :OK ``` This exception is highly problematic, for instance it breaks `Timeout.timeout` in `trap`: https://github.com/ruby/timeout/issues/17#issuecomment-1142035939 I suppose this behavior is because *sometimes* it's problematic to lock a Mutex in trap, e.g., if it's already locked by the main thread/fiber. However, that's just one case, not all, so we should not raise an exception early like that. There seems to be no valid reason to prevent *all* `Mutex#synchronize` in `trap`. After all, if the Mutex for instance is only used in `trap`, it's well-defined AFAIK. For instance a given trap handler does not seem executed concurrently: ``` $ ruby -ve 'trap(:HUP) { puts "in trap\n"+caller.join("\n")+"\n\n"; sleep 0.1 }; pid = Process.pid; Process.wait fork { 20.times { Process.kill :HUP, pid } }; sleep 1' ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [x86_64-linux] in trap -e:1:in `wait' -e:1:in `<main>' in trap -e:1:in `wait' -e:1:in `<main>' in trap -e:1:in `wait' -e:1:in `<main>' in trap -e:1:in `wait' -e:1:in `<main>' in trap -e:1:in `wait' -e:1:in `<main>' in trap -e:1:in `wait' -e:1:in `<main>' ``` And if the trap handler using the Mutex is never called while the Mutex is held by the main thread/fiber, there is also no problem. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 18

[ruby-core:117684] [Ruby master Bug#20452] Ruby 3.3 on Alpine Linux results in a relatively shallow SystemStackError exception
by Earlopain (A S) 17 Jun '25

17 Jun '25

Issue #20452 has been reported by Earlopain (A S). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20452: Ruby 3.3 on Alpine Linux results in a relatively shallow SystemStackError exception https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20452 * Author: Earlopain (A S) * Status: Open * ruby -v: 3.3.1 * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- This is a redo of https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14387, reported against a non-eol version. The same issue still applies on recent rubies, though I personally only have tested 3.3 and 3.2: ```rb n = 100000 res = {} 1.upto(n).to_a.inject(res) do |r, i| r[i] = {} end def f(x) x.each_value { |v| f(v) } end f(res) ``` The patch from https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14387#note-13 still works, though as per https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14387#note-16 it can't be accepted as is. With the patch applied: ``` (irb):8:in `block in f': stack level too deep (SystemStackError) from (irb):8:in `each_value' from (irb):8:in `f' from (irb):8:in `block in f' from (irb):8:in `each_value' from (irb):8:in `f' from (irb):8:in `block in f' from (irb):8:in `each_value' from (irb):8:in `f' ... 11549 levels... from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/irb-1.11.0/exe/irb:9:in `<top (required)>' from /usr/local/bin/irb:25:in `load' from /usr/local/bin/irb:25:in `<main>' ``` Without the patch: ``` (irb):8:in `each_value': stack level too deep (SystemStackError) from (irb):8:in `f' from (irb):8:in `block in f' from (irb):8:in `each_value' from (irb):8:in `f' from (irb):8:in `block in f' from (irb):8:in `each_value' from (irb):8:in `f' from (irb):8:in `block in f' ... 286 levels... from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.3.0/gems/irb-1.11.0/exe/irb:9:in `<top (required)>' from /usr/local/bin/irb:25:in `load' from /usr/local/bin/irb:25:in `<main>' ``` To reproduce, I have removed lines 102-105 from https://github.com/docker-library/ruby/blob/f5753434bb23041dd9913bb7b650e7b…. Check out the previous ticket for more information, there are a few conversations about possible solutions. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 11

[ruby-core:115422] [Ruby master Bug#20009] Marshal.load raises exception when load dumped class include non-ASCII
by ippachi (Kazuya Hatanaka) 15 Jun '25

15 Jun '25

Issue #20009 has been reported by ippachi (Kazuya Hatanaka). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20009: Marshal.load raises exception when load dumped class include non-ASCII https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20009 * Author: ippachi (Kazuya Hatanaka) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.2 (2023-03-30 revision e51014f9c0) [arm64-darwin22] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- ## Reproduction code ```ruby class Cクラス; end Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(Cクラス)) ``` ## Actual result ``` <internal:marshal>:34:in `load': undefined class/module C\xE3\x82\xAF\xE3\x83\xA9\xE3\x82\xB9 (ArgumentError) from marshal.rb:2:in `<main>' ``` ## Expected result Returns `Cクラス` ## Impacted area An exception is raised in Rails under the following conditions * minitest is used with default settings * Parallel execution with parallelize * test class names contain non-ASCII characters The default parallelization uses DRb, and Marshal is used inside DRb. ## Other After trying various things, I thought I could fix it by making `rb_path_to_class` support strings containing non-ASCII characters, but I couldn't find anything more than that. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

6 11

[ruby-core:111027] [Ruby master Bug#19154] Specify require and autoload guarantees in ractors
by fxn (Xavier Noria) 08 Jun '25

08 Jun '25

Issue #19154 has been reported by fxn (Xavier Noria). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19154: Specify require and autoload guarantees in ractors https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19154 * Author: fxn (Xavier Noria) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.2.0preview3 (2022-11-27) [x86_64-darwin22] * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Given a file `c.rb`: ```ruby class C end ``` the following script: ```ruby r1 = Ractor.new do require './c.rb' end r2 = Ractor.new do require './c.rb' end r1.take r2.take ``` raises: ``` % ruby -v foo.rb ruby 3.2.0preview3 (2022-11-27) [x86_64-darwin22] foo.rb:1: warning: Ractor is experimental, and the behavior may change in future versions of Ruby! Also there are many implementation issues. #<Thread:0x000000010fee2928 run> terminated with exception (report_on_exception is true): #<Thread:0x00000001102acfe0 run> terminated with exception (report_on_exception is true): <internal:/Users/fxn/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0-preview3/lib/ruby/3.2.0+3/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:164:in `ensure in require': can not access non-shareable objects in constant Kernel::RUBYGEMS_ACTIVATION_MONITOR by non-main ractor. (Ractor::IsolationError) from <internal:/Users/fxn/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0-preview3/lib/ruby/3.2.0+3/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:167:in `require' from foo.rb:6:in `block in <main>' <internal:/Users/fxn/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0-preview3/lib/ruby/3.2.0+3/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:37:in `require'<internal:/Users/fxn/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0-preview3/lib/ruby/3.2.0+3/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:164:in `ensure in require': : can not access non-shareable objects in constant Kernel::RUBYGEMS_ACTIVATION_MONITOR by non-main ractor. (Ractor::IsolationError) from <internal:/Users/fxn/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0-preview3/lib/ruby/3.2.0+3/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:167:in `require' can not access non-shareable objects in constant Kernel::RUBYGEMS_ACTIVATION_MONITOR by non-main ractor. (Ractor::IsolationError) from foo.rb:2:in `block in <main>' <internal:/Users/fxn/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0-preview3/lib/ruby/3.2.0+3/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:37:in `require': can not access non-shareable objects in constant Kernel::RUBYGEMS_ACTIVATION_MONITOR by non-main ractor. (Ractor::IsolationError) from foo.rb:2:in `block in <main>' from foo.rb:6:in `block in <main>' <internal:ractor>:698:in `take': thrown by remote Ractor. (Ractor::RemoteError) from foo.rb:9:in `<main>' <internal:/Users/fxn/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0-preview3/lib/ruby/3.2.0+3/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:164:in `ensure in require': can not access non-shareable objects in constant Kernel::RUBYGEMS_ACTIVATION_MONITOR by non-main ractor. (Ractor::IsolationError) from <internal:/Users/fxn/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0-preview3/lib/ruby/3.2.0+3/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:167:in `require' from foo.rb:2:in `block in <main>' <internal:/Users/fxn/.rbenv/versions/3.2.0-preview3/lib/ruby/3.2.0+3/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb>:37:in `require': can not access non-shareable objects in constant Kernel::RUBYGEMS_ACTIVATION_MONITOR by non-main ractor. (Ractor::IsolationError) from foo.rb:2:in `block in <main>' ``` Would it be possible to have documentation about their interaction? This is important also to understand autoloading within ractors, since constant references may trigger `require` calls. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

4 11

[ruby-core:115981] [Ruby master Bug#20105] Introduce `IO::Stream` or something similar.
by ioquatix (Samuel Williams) 07 Jun '25

07 Jun '25

Issue #20105 has been reported by ioquatix (Samuel Williams). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20105: Introduce `IO::Stream` or something similar. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20105 * Author: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ioquatix (Samuel Williams) * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Ruby's IO class has a general model for streaming IO, including some hidden classes like `IO::generic_readable` and `IO::generic_writable`. As Ruby's core IO classes evolve, gems like `openssl` (see `OpenSSL::Buffering`) need to be updated to support changes to the interface. As it stands, there are changes in `IO` which are not copied to `OpenSSL::Buffering`. I'd like to propose we introduce some shared interface for streams that is used by `IO`, `Socket`, and `OpenSSL` to start with. The general interface would be similar to `IO` and allow code like `OpenSSL` to avoid re-implementing the `IO` interface. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

2 2

[ruby-core:117216] [Ruby master Bug#20346] FiberScheduler.unblock not called by Thread#join when Thread body contains Ractor.take
by forthoney (Seong-Heon Jung) 05 Jun '25

05 Jun '25

Issue #20346 has been reported by forthoney (Seong-Heon Jung). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20346: FiberScheduler.unblock not called by Thread#join when Thread body contains Ractor.take https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20346 * Author: forthoney (Seong-Heon Jung) * Status: Open * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- When using a `Ractor.take` inside a different thread, `Thread#join` on the thread running `Ractor.take` fails to call `FiberScheduler.unblock`. The below code can replicate this behavior ```ruby require "async" class RactorWrapper def initialize @ractor = Ractor.new do Ractor.recv # Ractor doesn't start until explicitly told to # Do some calculations fib = ->(x) { x < 2 ? 1 : fib.call(x - 1) + fib.call(x - 2) } fib.call(20) end end def take_async @ractor.send(nil) Thread.new { @ractor.take }.join.value end end Async do |task| 10000.times do |i| task.async do RactorWrapper.new.take_async puts i end end end ``` The above code deadlocks, and when we leave a debugging print statement inside of `Async`'s scheduler's `block` and `unblock` method, we can confirm that we only call `Scheduler.block`, and never `Scheduler.unblock` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 2

[ruby-core:117392] [Ruby master Feature#20405] Inline comments
by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) 03 Jun '25

03 Jun '25

Issue #20405 has been reported by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada). ---------------------------------------- Feature #20405: Inline comments https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20405 * Author: nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) * Status: Open ---------------------------------------- I propose a new inline comment syntax. ```ruby p (| This is a comment (| and nested one |) /:|) (:|) #=> :| ``` -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

7 9

[ruby-core:115995] [Ruby master Bug#20112] Ractors not working properly in ruby 3.3.0
by ariasdiniz (Aria Diniz) 19 May '25

19 May '25

Issue #20112 has been reported by ariasdiniz (Aria Diniz). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20112: Ractors not working properly in ruby 3.3.0 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20112 * Author: ariasdiniz (Aria Diniz) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: 3.3.0 * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I recently installed Ruby 3.3.0, and noticed that some of my scripts that use Ractors started to struggle with performance. After doing some benchmarks, I noticed that, while Ractors seem to be working well on Ruby 3.2.2, they're not working properly on 3.3.0. I'm using Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS Here is the benchmark code: ``` ruby # frozen_string_literal: true require 'benchmark' Ractor.new { :warmup } if defined?(Ractor) Benchmark.bmbm do |x| x.report("Thread: ") do threads = [] 8.times do |i| threads << Thread.new do 20000000.times do |j| ((i * 20000000) + j)**2 end end end threads.each(&:join) end x.report("Ractor: ") do ractors = [] 0..8.times do |i| ractors << Ractor.new(i) do |k| 20000000.times do |j| ((k * 20000000) + j)**2 end end end ractors.map(&:take) end end ``` Here is the results for Ruby 3.2.2: Rehearsal -------------------------------------------- Thread: 7.666909 0.001091 7.668000 ( 7.675266) Ractor: 19.318528 0.012017 19.330545 ( 2.505888) ---------------------------------- total: 26.998545sec user system total real Thread: 7.918141 0.004011 7.922152 ( 7.928772) Ractor: 19.366414 0.003954 19.370368 ( 2.517993) Here is the results for Ruby 3.3.0: Rehearsal -------------------------------------------- Thread: 8.634152 0.010895 8.645047 ( 8.645104) Ractor: 100.172179 0.035985 100.208164 ( 15.213245) --------------------------------- total: 108.853211sec user system total real Thread: 9.451236 0.004002 9.455238 ( 9.460132) Ractor: 118.463294 0.119942 118.583236 ( 18.462157) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

5 4

[ruby-core:111809] [Ruby master Bug#19338] Ruby hangs when defining new constant in ractor
by luke-gru (Luke Gruber) 13 May '25

13 May '25

Issue #19338 has been reported by luke-gru (Luke Gruber). ---------------------------------------- Bug #19338: Ruby hangs when defining new constant in ractor https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19338 * Author: luke-gru (Luke Gruber) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Backport: 2.7: UNKNOWN, 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- This code causes Ruby to hang: ``` ruby rs = [] 2.times do rs << Ractor.new do MYCONSTANT = 2 end end rs.each(&:take) ``` There is a problem when the warning is being outputted with multiple ractors. A thread is calling RB_VM_LOCK() while holding the VM lock in ractor.c (ractor_check_blocking()) If the code is changed to RB_VM_LOCK_ENTER() and RB_VM_LOCK_LEAVE() then it fixes it, but I don't know if there's a better way. Thanks! -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 3

[ruby-core:116085] [Ruby master Bug#20165] Ractors moving a Struct breaks beyond the first 3 fields
by codekitchen (Brian Palmer) 09 May '25

09 May '25

Issue #20165 has been reported by codekitchen (Brian Palmer). ---------------------------------------- Bug #20165: Ractors moving a Struct breaks beyond the first 3 fields https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20165 * Author: codekitchen (Brian Palmer) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * ruby -v: ruby 3.3.0 (2023-12-25 revision 5124f9ac75) [arm64-darwin23] * Backport: 3.0: UNKNOWN, 3.1: UNKNOWN, 3.2: UNKNOWN, 3.3: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Experimenting with Ractors on ruby 3.3.0, and I'm seeing a bug where if you move a struct between ractors, all but the first 3 fields are set to nil. ``` ruby Foo = Struct.new(:a,:b,:c,:d,:e,:f) r = Ractor.new { foo = Foo[0,0,0,0,0,0] p foo Ractor.yield(foo, move: true) } p r.take ``` ``` ❯ ruby -v ruby 3.3.0 (2023-12-25 revision 5124f9ac75) [arm64-darwin23] ❯ ruby rbug.rb rbug.rb:3: warning: Ractor is experimental, and the behavior may change in future versions of Ruby! Also there are many implementation issues. #<struct Foo a=0, b=0, c=0, d=0, e=0, f=0> #<struct Foo a=0, b=0, c=0, d=nil, e=nil, f=nil> ``` This seems specific to moving, if I set `move: false` the struct makes it across OK. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

3 2