Timeline for Looking ahead, starting conversations, and seizing the moment
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
31 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 hours ago | comment | added | George Stocker | “We hope someone from this community will start this conversation.” Someone from this community that you already know if they’re here they’re likely diametrically opposed to what you want to do? Do you see the irony there? | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Michael come lately | "Expanding the scope of content on Stack Overflow is the direction we, as a company, have decided to move towards." Thanks for saying so directly, even if it took 400 words to get to the lede. Best of luck with that. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | JonSG | "making sure their quality adheres to reasonable standards." I guess we can agree to disagree, | |
| yesterday | comment | added | M-- | Bert, better late than never; but let me pat myself on the back :) Do you remember Can Discussions be saved post? Now we have API, community editing, downvotes, etc. It won't be all hunky-dory, but with the minimums in place, you'll give yourself (and us) a higher chance of success. | |
| 2 days ago | answer | added | CharonX | timeline score: 11 | |
| 2 days ago | history | edited | BertholdStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Adding JNat to this list
|
| 2 days ago | comment | added | TylerH | This post should have come like a month before meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/440088/… | |
| 2 days ago | comment | added | julaine | @Lundin We keep saying we are done with this site. Happens around 20 times per year. | |
| Jul 13 at 8:49 | answer | added | SPArcheon | timeline score: 16 | |
| Jul 13 at 8:09 | comment | added | SPArcheon | @SecurityHound or if you (as in, the company) just listen to the "friendly on-our-side collaborative mods" and ignore everyone else who doesn't support your view or doesn't actively work to protect your posts from negative feedback. Yep, different treatment for mods with some mods being "more equal than others" (just to quote Animal Farm) based on how "supportive" they are is something I have been feeling for quite a bit now. Mods who don't support this will just be ignored and their concern dismissed as "not existing". | |
| Jul 11 at 17:57 | answer | added | balpha | timeline score: 42 | |
| Jul 11 at 1:01 | comment | added | Security Hound | @Lundin - That’s because they don’t agree with your feedback, easier to confirm what the community wants, if you just limit what you listen to only the users that contain within the eye of the storm. | |
| Jul 10 at 16:55 | answer | added | Gimby | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jul 10 at 12:47 | comment | added | Lundin | I already gave lots of constructive feedback on this in November which was completely ignored. Over and over it goes: the company asking for feedback then ignore everything said. Not just some of it but everything. Every time. Happens around 20 times per year. I'm done with wasting my time. If you want feedback for me from now on, I'll charge by the hour. | |
| Jul 10 at 9:18 | comment | added | Sayse | I think I know the answer but why is the non-featured AMA so hidden in this post? | |
| Jul 10 at 6:10 | answer | added | bta | timeline score: 23 | |
| Jul 9 at 18:56 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | @It's not only the migration, it's the whole format. I think it requires a disproportional effort to curate also in the future and while I don't want to do that myself, I'm absolutely fine if others do it. | |
| Jul 9 at 18:54 | comment | added | Dalija Prasnikar Mod | @NoDataDumpNoContribution I don't know how the migration process will look like, but I think we will clean up or not migrate useless stuff. | |
| Jul 9 at 18:51 | history | edited | philipxy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replace FAQ tag search page url by informative post FAQ Index for Stack Overflow
|
| Jul 9 at 18:51 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | @DalijaPrasnikar Yes but there is always a price tag attached. Somebody will have to do the work. I've seen plenty of absolutely useless open-ended questions in the last months. I don't want to take care of them. Of course you can if you want. | |
| Jul 9 at 18:41 | history | edited | philipxy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
show the titles/names of services or self-described URLs so we actually know what you are talking about
|
| Jul 9 at 17:35 | comment | added | Dalija Prasnikar Mod | @NoDataDumpNoContribution The whole point of this post is asking community to help with defining "what goes and what does not". | |
| Jul 9 at 16:56 | answer | added | PM 2Ring | timeline score: 31 | |
| Jul 9 at 16:47 | answer | added | user400654 | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jul 9 at 16:11 | answer | added | DharmanMod | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jul 9 at 16:02 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | My appetite for curating anything goes questions is extremely low. And this post is quite long. Maybe a summary could be added. | |
| Jul 9 at 15:47 | answer | added | starballMod | timeline score: 25 | |
| Jul 9 at 15:41 | comment | added | l4mpi | You have resources to create a ChatGPT wrapper that nobody asked for (so.AI) and a moltbook / cq clone that nobody asked for (SOfA). But no resources to make anything but "modest changes" to the platform. OK I guess. | |
| Jul 9 at 15:36 | history | edited | Thom AMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 9 at 15:26 | history | edited | BertholdStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 48 characters in body
|
| Jul 9 at 15:21 | history | asked | BertholdStaffMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |