Timeline for answer to How should I handle a suggested edit with "Comment: gerhdtcfjvygkbuhnj" as the edit summary? by Joe W
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2019 at 17:47 | vote | accept | sanyassh | ||
| May 3, 2019 at 8:24 | comment | added | Braiam | AFAIK, the asdlkfjldsajf and a generic "improving formatting" would be the same. The edit is too self evident an improvement of the post. | |
| May 2, 2019 at 12:34 | comment | added | jpmc26 | It looks more like they did a keyboard mash because they didn't feel like writing a description than they don't know. | |
| May 2, 2019 at 6:09 | comment | added | BSMP | @JackBashford There were other problems with the account and it was deleted | |
| May 2, 2019 at 0:33 | comment | added | Jack Bashford | You can't pin the author of this particular edit however - they're anonymous. | |
| May 1, 2019 at 12:34 | comment | added | yivi | I'm not saying that. But the OP saw the comment during review. At that point, leaving a comment and pinging the editor was not an option. | |
| May 1, 2019 at 12:33 | comment | added | Joe W | @yivi personally I would be a bit confused if a good edit got rejected because of a bad edit comment. | |
| May 1, 2019 at 12:23 | comment | added | sanyassh | You understand me correctly. The body of edit is rather good, the comment is the only problem, that's why I didn't reject it and asked on meta. | |
| May 1, 2019 at 12:19 | comment | added | yivi | Pinging the editor works in this case only becaue the edit was approved. Before the edit is approved, you can't ping the author of a suggested edit. | |
| May 1, 2019 at 12:14 | history | answered | Joe W | CC BY-SA 4.0 |