Timeline for 100 edits in one evening. Is it wrong?

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Jan 18, 2021 at 12:08	history	edited	CommunityBot		replaced http://chat.meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://chat.meta.stackexchange.com/
Nov 10, 2014 at 16:43	vote	accept	rtruszk
Nov 10, 2014 at 16:42	answer	added	rtruszk		timeline score: 10
Nov 9, 2014 at 23:56	answer	added	Unihedron		timeline score: 26
Nov 9, 2014 at 18:10	comment	added	user289086		I should point out that adding (or removing) project-euler is something that is the subject of debate. You would probably be advised to not do it until this gets better settled. The same could be said for other coding contest sites. See also tangental discussion in Burninate and blacklist the coursera tag
Nov 9, 2014 at 18:09	history	edited	Infinite Recursion	CC BY-SA 3.0	added 1 character in body
Nov 9, 2014 at 18:04	answer	added	bjb568		timeline score: 4
Nov 9, 2014 at 16:35	comment	added	animuson StaffMod		Generally if you're trying to figure out your 4th reason for doing this, you'd just ask how the community feels about it. There have been many discussions in the past about users mass retagging things (which is mostly what you say you were doing). It's not like there's a lack of information about it.
Nov 9, 2014 at 16:34	comment	added	Bart		Well, look at your last edit for example. A link and a tag. The tag may be useful (though I don't really like the tag as such), but you didn't improve the question. We still have to visit an external site to see what it's about. How about making fewer edits and actually making good ones?
Nov 9, 2014 at 16:33	comment	added	πάντα ῥεῖ		Looks you accused yourself for 'rep farming' :-P ...
Nov 9, 2014 at 16:33	history	edited	Louis	CC BY-SA 3.0	fixed typo, punctuation; added tags
Nov 9, 2014 at 16:31	history	asked	rtruszk	CC BY-SA 3.0