Timeline for Why is Stack Overflow so negative of late?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 10:57 | comment | added | CodingIntrigue | I have to agree with both @Liam and Shadow here. If I have to ask a question on SO, I've not done my research - because almost everything these days has been asked before). It would be nice for low rep users (<= 500?) to be rewarded for finding duplicates so that their first questions aren't crap. Once they get to grips with asking (> 500 rep) then hopefully they'd ask better questions. | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 10:21 | comment | added | PlasmaHH | Don't forget that sometimes its hard to decide which of the 20 duplicates to use in the duplicate-close-vote | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:04 | comment | added | Bernhard Barker | "So those regular users do their best to preserve quality by attacking the bad posts and trying to educate the users, sometimes being harsh while doing so." - I don't quite agree on this part. The problem, as I see it, is that the vast majority of these "regulars" don't appear to care about quality of posts / this site at all. If they did, these questions won't often get answers and we'd likely weed them out quite quickly. | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 8:57 | history | answered | user447356 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |