kor_ol wrote in meditators

Dharma Quote of the Week

...Nagarjuna's Fundamental Treatise says, "That which arises dependently we explain as emptiness. This [emptiness] is dependent designation; this is the middle way." His Refutation of Objections says, "I bow down to the Buddha, the unequaled, supreme teacher, who taught that emptiness, dependent arising, and the middle way hold a single meaning."

For Tsong-kha-pa, the compatibility of emptiness and dependent arising is the very heart of the Madhyamaka view and the key to the path. Dependent arising means that things come into being in dependence upon causes and conditions. Understanding dependent arising correctly refutes the idea that things exist in and of themselves--because they must depend on other things. In the same moment, it also refutes the nihilist extreme--because it shows that things do arise, they do come into existence, and they affect one another. Thus, Tsong-kha-pa advises that if you think that you may have found the profound view of emptiness, you should check to see if you have negated too much. Can this "emptiness" you have discovered be reconciled with the mere existence of things that arise interdependently? If not, then you are certainly mistaken.

...The point is that one cannot become a buddha without both compassionate action and nondual wisdom--and one cannot have these two types of path without both of the two truths, conventional and ultimate. If only emptiness existed and there were, in fact, no conventional truths, then there would be no living beings, no suffering to relieve; thus there would be no compassionate action; and thus there would be no buddhahood. Therefore, maintaining the compatibility of the two truths--the compatibility of emptiness and dependent arising--is crucial to the whole of the Dharma.

--from Introduction to Emptiness: As Taught in Tsong-kha-pa's Great Treatise on the Stages of the Path by Guy Newland, published by Snow Lion Publications

LJ Video