Timeline for The Alexandroff compactification is the biggest one-point compactification?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2012 at 23:25 | comment | added | Camilo Arosemena Serrato | sorry, I hadn't seen your "moreover" | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 21:57 | comment | added | Brian M. Scott | @Camilo: My statement that $\tau^*$ and $\tau'$ have the same nbhds of $p$ means exactly the same as your version. And yes, we do necessarily have $\tau^*\subseteq\tau'$; what my example shows is that we don’t necessarily have $\tau'\subseteq\tau^*$. | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 21:47 | comment | added | Camilo Arosemena Serrato | and also think that what you wanted to show in the first part was that $p$ has the same neighborhoods in $\left<{X,\tau^´}\right>$ and $\left<{X,\tau^*}\right>$; note that not necessarly we have $\tau^*\subseteq{\tau^´}$, because of your counterexamnple; note that the space of your counterexample is locally compact. | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 21:40 | vote | accept | Camilo Arosemena Serrato | ||
| Oct 23, 2012 at 21:39 | comment | added | Brian M. Scott | @Camilo: I did indeed; thanks for catching it. | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 21:39 | history | edited | Brian M. Scott | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed a typo.
|
| Oct 23, 2012 at 21:34 | comment | added | Camilo Arosemena Serrato | I think what you meant was $\left\{{0}\right\}\cup{\left\{{\displaystyle\frac{1}{n}:n\in{\mathbb{Z}^+}}\right\}}$, correcting this your proof, is correct Thank you very much!!!!!!!! | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 7:04 | history | answered | Brian M. Scott | CC BY-SA 3.0 |