Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology ((IDCA))

  • 1306 Accesses

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

The Lanier Center for Archaeology Tel Gezer excavations has recently concluded 10 seasons of excavations at Tel Gezer, Israel. This project has excavated five major destructions from the Late Bronze III to Iron Age IIB (thirteenth–eighth centuries BCE). These destructions have been associated with military campaigns from outside (e.g. Egyptian, Assyrian). This paper will present an overview of the nature of these destructions, the preservation of the archaeological record, and possible historical reconstructions. Discussion of the Gezer destructions in light of recent methodological and theoretical approaches to defining destruction layers in the archaeological record will be presented. Emphasis will be placed on a contextual approach to the identification of destructions in the archaeological record.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 399.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Now called the American Society of Overseas Research.

  2. 2.

    Adopted from Driessen who defines crisis architecture as specific and sudden short term architectural changes to come as a response to situations of social crisis (Driessen, 1995: 66).

  3. 3.

    R.A.S. Macalister’s ‘Maccabean Castle’, Hebrew Union College’s Field III.

  4. 4.

    A noticeable difference is that they have evidence for destruction in certain areas of the site while in another field, they might not have evidence. This suggests that either there was destruction due to military attacks/human invaders only in particular sections of the city, or the evidence was only preserved in particular contexts. We will discuss this below.

  5. 5.

    See Ortiz and Wolff (2021) for discussion of dating.

  6. 6.

    Stratum 9 represents an ephemeral phase constructed on top of stratum 10. It consists of foundation remnants of a single domestic structure.

  7. 7.

    Note that Dever (1985) found parts of this building, which he identified as Palace 10,000. He recognized that this was a large administrative/elite building based on the construction (e.g. ashlar masonry) and partial plan, he did not know that it was one of these typical Bit Hilani-type structures.

  8. 8.

    This destruction was also defined by the HUC excavations.

  9. 9.

    Kreimerman (2017b).

References

  • Berlejung, A. (Ed.). (2012). Disaster and Relief Management/Katastrophen und ihre Bewältigung. Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, E. H. (2011). Whole Lota Shakin’ going on: The possible destruction by earthquake of Stratum VIA at Megiddo. In I. Finkelstein & N. Na’aman (Eds.), The fire signals of Lachish: Studies in the archaeology and history of Israel in the Late Bronze Age, Iron Age, and Persian Period in honor of David Ussishkin (pp. 55–70). Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, T. (2013). Deconstructing destructions: A contextual approach to methodology and meaning in archaeology. In J. Driessen (Ed.), Destruction: Archaeological, philological and historical perspectives (pp. 51–59). Presses universitaire de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, W. G. (1985). Solomonic and Assyrian period ‘Palaces’ at Gezer. Israel Exploration Journal, 35(4), 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, W. G. (1986). Late Bronze Age and Solomonic defenses at Gezer: New evidence. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 262, 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, W. G. (1992a). A case study in biblical archaeology: The earthquake of ca. 760 BCE. Eretz-Israel, 23, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, W. G. (1992b). Gezer. In D. N. Freedman (Ed.), Anchor bible dictionary. Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, W. G., & Younker, R. W. (1990). Tell Gezer, 1990. Israel Exploration Journal, 41, 282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, W. G., Lance, H. D., & Wright, G. E. (1970). Gezer I: Preliminary report of the 1964–66 seasons. Annual of the Hebrew Union College Biblical and Archaeological School in Jerusalem I. Nelson Glueck School of Biblical Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, W. G., Lance, H. D., Bullard, R. G., Cole, D. P., & Seger, J. D. (1974). Gezer II: Report of the 1967–1970 seasons in Fields I and II. Annual of the Hebrew Union College/Nelson Glueck School of Biblical Archaeology II. Nelson Glueck School of Biblical Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, W. G., Lance, H. D., & Bullard, R. G. (1986). Gezer IV: The 1969–71 seasons in Field VI, the “Acropolis”. Nelson Glueck School of Biblical Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, J. (1995). Crisis architecture? Some observations on architectural adaptations and immediate responses to changing socio-cultural conditions. Topoi, 5, 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, J. (2013a). Time capsules? Destructions as archaeological phenomena. In J. Driessen (Ed.), Destruction: Archaeological, philological and historical perspectives (pp. 5–23). Presses universitaire de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, J. (Ed.). (2013b). Destruction: Archaeological, philological and historical perspectives. Presses universitaire de Louvain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, D. V. (2012). Earthquakes in the Ancient Southern Levant: A literary Topos and a problem requiring architectural solutions. In A. Berlejung (Ed.), Disaster and Relief Management/Katastrophen und ihre Bewältigung (pp. 205–238). Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiaccavento, C. (2014a). Destructions as historical markers towards the end of the 2nd and during the 1st millennium BC in Southern Levant. In L. Nigro (Ed.), Overcoming Catastrophes. Essays on disastrous agents characterization and resilience strategies in pre-classical Southern Levant (ROSAPAT 11—PRIN 2009-The Seven Plagues).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiaccavento, C. (2014b). Destructions as historical markers towards the end of the 2nd and during the 1st millennium BC in Southern Levant. In L. Nigro (Ed.), Overcoming Catastrophes: Essays on disastrous agents characterization and resilience strategies in pre-classical Southern Levant (Rome “La Spienza” Studies on the Archaeology of Palestine & Transjordan, pp. 205–259). Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, I. (1996). The archaeology of the united monarchy: An alternative view. Levant, 28, 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, I. (2000). The campaign of Shoshenq I to Palestine. Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästina-Vereins, 118, 109–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, I. (2009). Destructions: Megiddo as a case study. In J. David Schloen (Ed.), Exploring the Longue Durée: Essays in Honor of Lawrence E. Stager (pp. 113–126). Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forget, M., & Shahack-Gross, R. (2016). How long does it take to burn down an Ancient Near Eastern City? Antiquity, 90, 1213–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forget, M., Regev, L., Friesem, D., & Shahack-Gross, R. (2015). Physical and mineralogical properties of experimentally heated sun-dried mud bricks: Implications for reconstruction of environmental factors influencing the appearance of mud bricks in archaeological conflagration events. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2, 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitin, S. (1990). A ceramic typology of the Late Iron II, Persian and Hellenistic periods at Tell Gezer: Based on a stratigraphic analysis of Field VII West. Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasel, M. (1998). Domination and resistance: Egyptian military activity in the Southern Levant, 1300–1185 BC. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasel, M. (2016). The archaeology of destruction: Methodological desiderata. In S. Ganor, I. Kreimerman, K. Streit, & M. Mumcuoglu (Eds.), From Sha’ar Hagolan to Shaaraim: Essay in Honor of Prof. Yosef Garfinkel (pp. 205–228). Israel Exploration Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfflmayer, F. (2014). Dating Catastrophes and collapses in the Ancient Near East: The end of the first urbanization in the Southern Levant and the 4.2 ka BP event. In L. Nigro (Ed.), Overcoming Catastrophes. Essays on disastrous agents characterization and resilience strategies in pre-classical Southern Levant (pp. 117–140) (ROSAPAT 11—PRIN 2009—The Seven Plagues).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusseret, S., & Sintubin, M. (2012). All that rubble leads to trouble: Reassessing the seismological value of archaeological destruction layers in Minoan Crete and beyond. Seismological Research Letters, 83, 736–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreimerman, I. (2016). Siege warfare, conflict and destruction: How are they related? In S. Ganor, I. Kreimerman, K. Streit, & M. Mumcuoglu (Eds.), From Sha’ar Hagolan to Shaaraim: Essay in Honor of Prof. Yosef Garfinkel (pp. 229–245). Israel Exploration Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreimerman, I. (2017a). A typology for destruction layers: The Late Bronze Age Southern Levant as a case study. In T. Cunningham & J. Driessen (Eds.), Crisis to collapse: The archaeology of social breakdown (Aegis 11) (pp. 173–203). Presses Universitaires de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreimerman, I. (2017b). Skeletons in Bronze and Iron Age destruction contexts in the southern Levant: What do they mean? West and East, II, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreimerman, I., & Shahack-Gross, R. (2018). Understanding conflagration of one-story mud-brick structures: An experimental approach. In Archaeological and anthropological sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0714-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, G., & Killebrew, A. (2010). Palace 6000 at Megiddo in context: Iron Age central hall tetra-partite residencies and the Bit-Hilani building tradition in the Levant. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 359, 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macalister, R. A. S. (1912). The excavation of Gezer, 1902–1905 and 1907–1909, Volumes 1–3. Palestine Exploration Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeir, A. M. (2004). Bronze and Iron Age Tombs at Tel Gezer, Israel: Finds from Raymond-Charles Weill’s excavations in 1914 and 1921 (BAR international series 1206). Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marco, S., Agonon, A., Finkelstein, I., & Ussishkin, D. (2006). Chapter 31: Megiddo earthquakes. In Megiddo VI (pp. 568–575). Tel Aviv University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münger, S. (2003). Egyptian stamp-seal amulets and their implications for the chronology of the Early Iron Age. Tel Aviv, 30, 66–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münger, S., Ortiz, S., & Wolff, S. (forthcoming). A seal impression on a clay stopper from Tel Gezer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigro, L. (Ed.). (2014). Overcoming catastrophes: Essays on disastrous agents characterization and resilience strategies in pre-classical Southern Levant (Rome “La Spienza” studies on the archaeology of Palestine & Transjordan). Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nur, A., & Cline, E. H. (2000). Poseidon’s horses: Plate tectonics and earthquake storms in the Late Bronze Age Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S., & Wolff, S. (2017). Tel Gezer excavations 2006-2015: The transformation of a Border City. In O. Lipschits & A. M. Maeir (Eds.), “…as plentiful as sycamore-fig tress in the Shephelah” (1 Kings 10:27) recent archaeological research in the Shephelah of Judah: The Iron Age (pp. 61–102). Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S., & Wolff, S. (2019). A reevaluation of Gezer in the Late Bronze Age in light of renewed excavations and recent scholarship. In A. M. Maeir, I. Shai, & C. McKinny (Eds.), And the Canaanite was in then in the land (Gen. 12:6): Canaanites in Southern Canaan during the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages. Proceedings of the Ackerman Family Workshop in Biblical Archaeology, Bar-Ilan University, April 15th–16th, 2015 (pp. 62–85). DeGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S., & Wolff, S. (2021). New evidence for the 10th century BCE at Tel Gezer. In A. Faust, Y. Garfinkel, & M. Mumcuoglu (Eds.), State formation processes in the 10th century BCE Levant (Jerusalem Journal of Archaeology) (Vol. 1, pp. 221–240).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S., & Wolff, S. (forthcoming). The Sheshonq Redemption: An Analysis of the Current and Previous Excavation Results of the 10th Century BCE Destruction at Tel Gezer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, A. (1935a). Excavations at Gezer. Palestine Exploration Fund Quarterly Statement, 67, 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, A. (1935b). Gezer. Quarterly of the Department of Antiquities in Palestine, 4, 198–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seger, J. D., Lance, H. D., & Bullard, R. G. (1988). Gezer V: The Field 1 caves. Nelson Glueck School of Biblical Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahack-Gross, R. (2017). Rethinking destruction by fire: Geoarchaeological case studies in Tel Megiddo and the importance of construction methods. In O. Lipschits, Y. Gadot, & M. J. Adams (Eds.), Rethinking Israel: Studies in the history and archaeology of Ancient Israel in Honor of Israel Finkelstein (pp. 125–130). Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahack-Gross, R., Shaar, R., Hassul, E., Forget, M., Nowacyk, N., Marck, S., Finkelstein, I., & Argnon, A. (2018). Fire and collapse: Untangling the formation of destruction layers using archaeomagnetism. Geoarchaeology, 33, 513–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, I., & Zarzecki-Peleg, A. (2006). Podium structures with lateral access: Authority ploys in royal architecture in the Iron Age Levant. In S. Gitin, J. E. Wright, & J. P. Dessel (Eds.), Confronting the past: Archaeological and historical essays on Ancient Israel in Honor of William G. Dever (pp. 145–167). Eisenbrauns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, L., Ortiz, S., Wolff, S., et al. (forthcoming). The chronology of Gezer from the late Bronze Age crisis to Iron Age II: A meeting point for radiocarbon, archaeology, egyptology and the Bible.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, S. R. (2021). The date of destruction of Gezer Stratum VI. Tel Aviv, 48(1), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Younker, R. (1991). A preliminary report of the 1990 season at Tel Gezer: Excavations of the “Outer Wall” and the “Solomonic” gateway (July 2 to August 10, 1990). Andrews University Seminary Studies, 29(1), 19–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelwer-Silberberg, P. (1942). Les Tombes du Bronze et du Premier Age du Fer de Tell Gezer Mobilier et Typologie: Memoire d’après les fouilles de Raymond Weill 1913–1914 et 1923–1924 accompagné d’un Tableau des classements des tombes de Gézer. Pubished by ancienne élève de l’École du Louvre, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven M. Ortiz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ortiz, S.M. (2023). Gezer Destructions: A Case Study of a Border City. In: Ben-Yosef, E., Jones, I.W.N. (eds) “And in Length of Days Understanding” (Job 12:12). Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27330-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27330-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27329-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27330-8

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics