Immigration / Sprawl -  Anchor babies (801 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
Messages 1 through 7 of 22 were Deleted  

 
From: EdGlaze DelphiPlus Member Icon Posted by host11/10/24 7:58 AM 
To: All  (8 of 22) 
 429.8 in reply to 429.7 


ANCHOR BABIES AWAY: SCOTUS can Fix Illegal Immigration...
9 Nov 24
[44:22]

Illegal immigration was at the forefront of President Trump's reelection bid and he has already discussed taking executive orders to thwart the so-called "anchor baby" issue. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner discusses this issue, and a related, important 19th century Supreme Court precedent.

US v. Wong Kim Ark

0:00 Intro 1:50 Why This Matters & How This Works...
4:20 Birth Tourism
6:50 Substantive vs Procedural Law
10:08 What Trump is Planning To Do...
11:53 Does the 14th Amendment Protect Birthright Citizenship?
15:10 Why This Was Adopted & "Hostile Occupation"
19:36 Two More Examples
22:40 Thank You!

 

 

  • Edited November 10, 2024 8:00 am  by  EdGlaze
 

 
From: EdGlaze DelphiPlus Member Icon Posted by host1/23/25 6:39 AM 
To: All  (9 of 22) 
 429.9 in reply to 429.8 

Excerpt:

PROTECTING THE MEANING AND VALUE OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP
EXECUTIVE ORDER
January 20, 2025

But the Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States. The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Consistent with this understanding, the Congress has further specified through legislation that “a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” is a national and citizen of the United States at birth, 8 U.S.C. 1401, generally mirroring the Fourteenth Amendment’s text.

Among the categories of individuals born in the United States and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, the privilege of United States citizenship does not automatically extend to persons born in the United States: (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States at the time of said person’s birth was lawful but temporary (such as, but not limited to, visiting the United States under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program or visiting on a student, work, or tourist visa) and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.

 

____________

 

From Trump's first term in office:


Ending Birthright Citizenship Is Constitutional
9 Nov 18
[2:59]

President Trump says that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution does not require universal birthright citizenship and he is right. Here’s why.

 

 

 

And now in his second term:


House Republicans want to end US birthright citizenship with legislation
23 Jan 25
[1:15]

Republican members of Congress say they want to codify President Donald Trump's order aimed at ending birthright citizenship in the United States. (AP Video: Rick Gentilo, produced by Serkan Gurbuz).

A federal judge temporarily blocks Trump’s executive order redefining birthright citizenship: https://bit.ly/4hKYjC3

 

 

 


14th Amendment DOES NOT Guarantee Birthright Citizenship': Amy Swearer
23 Jan 25
[8:47]

Amy Swearer, a legal fellow at Heritage Foundation, explains how the 14th Amendment doesn't guarantee birthright citzenship.

  • Edited January 26, 2025 9:34 am  by  EdGlaze
 

 
From: EdGlaze DelphiPlus Member Icon Posted by host1/26/25 5:50 PM 
To: All  (10 of 22) 
 429.10 in reply to 429.9 

The TRUTH About Birthright Citizenship: 14th Amendment Debate!
24 Jan 25
[25:34]

President Trump signed an executive order limiting birthright citizenship, much to the outrage of the Progressive Woke specifically and the third world generally.

Those who oppose Trump are arguing that the 14th Amendment automatically grants United States citizenship to everyone born on American soil, no matter what.

But is this what the 14th Amendment really says — to allow any and all of the 9 billion people on the planet, none of whom have any allegiance to the United States, to birth children on US soil who then instantly become American citizens?

Are we supposed to simply accept that the 14th Amendment is effectively a mechanism of national self-destruction?

I think not, and I’d like to explain why, by using the actual history of the 14th Amendment itself.

 

Navigate this discussion: 1-10 11-20 21-22
Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved.