Wikipedia talk:TWA/Portal

(Redirected from Wikipedia:TWA/Lounge)
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Vitorperrut555 in topic Feedback

The
Adventure



Welcome to the Interstellar Lounge and Cafe!


More funky, or... ...less funky.
'Sit down, have a cup. While you're here something to muse on:'

Think about what an awesome trip you're on,
How many millions of people benefit from Wikipedia every day,
How marvelous it is that people all over the world have collaborated to create this unique resource,
How important sharing knowledge is,
How people working together over time can do amazing things.

Hope that was an inspiring musing. 😎-----😇 all to help u guys!

Get help

edit

Need help with something in The Wikipedia Adventure?

What to do next

edit

Tips for feedback

edit

Tell us what you liked about it, where we could improve, and what you learned

How you can help
  • Play the game all the way through. Do you get stuck anywhere? Is anything unclear?
  • Finish the game if you only played a few missions: Give some attention to missions 5-7 (which have been tested much less)
  • Start over fresh with a new account: Like User:OcaasiTWA17 (these are legitimate alternate testing accounts and are not considered sockpuppets)
  • Try a different browser: If you used Safari, try Firefox (or Chrome, Internet Explorer, Opera...)
  • Show the game to a friend or family member to see how they like it and if they get stuck anywhere
In your feedback, please include any of your thoughts on
  • text instructions within the game
  • graphic placement
  • bugs in the tour mechanics
  • your web browser
  • your screen resolution
  • which step of the tour you were on if something didn't work (see the step= in the url)
  • what you liked
  • what you didn't like
  • what you think would work better
  • your thoughts on the design: the theme, the guide, the characters, the colors, the images, the sounds

Please be specific if possible. If something is off about the wording, then specify exactly what should be changed, in what module. More specific feedback is more likely to get implemented.

Feedback

edit


What I liked

the concept is cool, especially for newcomers.

What I didn't like

it was a bit slow at start and i thought i had done something wrong.

What I wanted more of

hands on tutorials about sandboxes

What was unnecessary

...

Any other thoughts you want to share

uhhhhhh no.

--AsharInWiki (talk) 10:52, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

You did great! Remember everyone learns at different paces, so what may seem slow to you is right-on-pace for others. And, although you may be taking some additional onboarding that emphasises them, user sandboxes aren't really core to what Wikipedia is so I don't think The Wikipedia Adventure should. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:10, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Gotta love the irony. It's too slow paced. Next person giving feedback; it's too fast-paced. I think that tells me the pace is just right. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:48, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Feedback

edit
What I liked

I really liked how the program was structured to gradually teach Wikipedia editing along with some technical and programming-related concepts. The guidance provided by the trainers was very helpful, and the hands-on approach made it easier to understand how things work in real scenarios.

What I didn't like

At times, some instructions felt a bit fast-paced, especially for beginners who are completely new to editing or technical concepts.

What I wanted more of

I would have appreciated more detailed examples and a bit more time for practice, especially for advanced editing and technical sections.

What was unnecessary

Most of the content was relevant, but a few repetitive instructions could have been reduced.

Any other thoughts you want to share

Overall, it was a very useful and engaging program. It helped in building confidence in Wikipedia editing and gave a good introduction to technical contributions as well. Looking forward to more such programs in the future.

--Gauri Guptaa (talk) 18:21, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for playing, and I'm happy you enjoyed the adventure. It's worth pointing out that the adventure itself includes no time constraints; you are welcome to spend as much time as you want on each step before clicking next, and you are welcome to do unguided experimentation too. Given that the previous commenter complained that the pace is too slow I think it's probably fine. Re repetitive instructions I'm happy to take specific suggestions for wording changes. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Feedback

edit


What I liked

Easy and useful

What I didn't like

all good

What I wanted more of

felt about right

What was unnecessary

nothing

Any other thoughts you want to share

no

--CopperAlchemy (talk) 21:41, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for playing, and I'm happy you enjoyed the adventure. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:10, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Feedback

edit


What I liked

That learning is made through a game, so it's somewhat less daunting

What I didn't like

Too much info all on the same page

What I wanted more of

A bit more straightforward directions

What was unnecessary

the music

Any other thoughts you want to share

I am just starting to learn so I can't really judge

--Georgia Gaida (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for playing. Re the music, nothing is forcing you to actually play it so you can just ignore it if you want. And you are welcome to proceed at your own pace so I don't think too much info on the same page is a problem either. And re directions, I am happy to take specific suggestions for how to make them more straightforward. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:08, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Feedback

edit


What I liked

The game (I Play this when I'm bored)

What I didn't like

None

What I wanted more of

none

What was unnecessary

none

Any other thoughts you want to share

none


--VitorFriboquen :] (Talk) 20:25, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply