Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IIMT University (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dafootballguy | Want to talk? 23:41, 3 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

IIMT University

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:NSOURCE. Most of the "sources" literally are "google search" Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this article did survive the first nomination in 2022 under the assertion that non-English sources do exist, but details of them were not provided at the time, nor did anybody actually try add them to the article. (Meanwhile, the Google "sources" were added by an IP in September 2025.) No opinion at this time. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:44, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Uttar Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:44, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Education-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:16, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I checked for the sources - enough coverage is there in Hindi/English language articles to carve a proper Wiki page. It has the WP:POTENTIAL to improve itself. So we shouldn't WP:RUSHDELETE it, cuz after all, there is no WP:DEADLINE. While it's unfortunate that no one took interest to fix this in the last 4 years, but deletion isn't an alternative. But if others disagree, I don't mind WP:TNT-ing it. BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:03, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 08:39, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I also found that the school has had a good amount of coverage, after adding a few sources and removing the weird "google search" links, I believe the article meets GNG guidelines. nahle.ghini (talk) 00:06, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.