Infinityeditor

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Far too much unreferenced content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arun Ajikumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Infinityeditor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

I have updated the draft with more valid inline citations. Infinityeditor (talk) 08:23, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Does do meet WP:NACTOR who did not have lead or significant roles in multiple films.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arun Ajikumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 14:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

I Have updated the draft after carefully reviewing the notability guidelines. It now includes verified film credits that reflect Arun Ajikumar’s contributions in both supporting and prominent roles, along with citations from reliable sources. He began his acting journey in 2011 and made his feature film debut in School Bus (2016). In addition to acting, he is also an established publicity designer in the Malayalam film industry.

Arun currently has several notable projects in the pipeline,Thank you for taking the time to review the revised article. Infinityeditor (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Arun Ajikumar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Arun Ajikumar. Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 21:35, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arun Ajikumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PunjabiEditor69 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arun Ajikumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Arun Ajikumar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Arun Ajikumar. Thanks! Kirokeer (talk) 19:50, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

hey can you review this and approve if this article follows the rules Infinityeditor (talk) 19:53, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar has been accepted

Arun Ajikumar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kirokeer (talk) 10:12, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank You Kirokeer Infinityeditor (talk) 09:39, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Arun Ajikumar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Arun Ajikumar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your message and for taking the time to review the article.

I would like to clarify that the article had been live and publicly viewable for approximately four months prior to being converted back to draft status. I understand that articles can be reassessed at any time, and I respect that process.

I have already added a Conflict of Interest disclosure on my user page, as I have a limited personal connection to the subject. I am contributing in good faith and am committed to following Wikipedia’s policies, including maintaining a neutral point of view.

I will work on strengthening the draft by adding additional independent, reliable sources to better establish notability. Once the improvements are complete, I will resubmit the draft for review. Infinityeditor (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

None of these appear to be leading roles. The sources are mainly mentions or unreliable (see WP:NEWSORGINDIA). The only thing done since this was moved to draft was a WP:REFBOMB for one role (adding seven references to the same film in the filmography). Notability is not about the number of sources, but the quality of those sources and their depth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arun Ajikumar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 22:59, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (January 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Thilsebatti was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Thilsebatti (talk) 08:34, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

why is like this..im constantly updating relavant references from reliable source and the draft is beign rejected. Infinityeditor (talk) 09:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (May 23)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Arun Ajikumar to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Thilsebatti (talk) 07:25, 23 May 2026 (UTC)