Theleekycauldron

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

White to move, so it's leeky's turn – check back later! (last mover: TechnoSquirrel69)

Inbox

Sometimes messages slip through the cracks. Sorry about that! I keep this list to let me know what I still need to respond to – feel free to add your own name and message here if you're still looking for a response from me.

*New message 18/07/2026
Dear theleekycauldron,
I would like some wisdom on how to navigate the Wikimedia commons and editing in general. I am looking to start a user page and I am genuinely unsure about the syntax. I also would be interested in learning more about custom gadgets. I stumbled upon your article Promotion of United States v. Moore (1973). It's sincerely very interesting. I could definitely learn some things from you? -AstrologerBotanist

1. 05:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC) fill out your thing at WP:REFLECTIONS – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)
2. 02:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC) ban houseblaster from my talk page for messing with the inbox format theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
3. 06:14, 26 January 2026 (UTC) amber

FYI

WP:AE#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Wh1pla5h99 * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 02:29, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

United States v. Moore (1973)

i hope your article gets nominated soon! i was the one who helped with the pixel size on that one image. i wish i could help at the moment, but i’m unable to for some personal reasons. good luck! frankie they/them (t • c) 22:02, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, frankie, that's so sweet of you! I'm hopeful too, and really excited to have my drive for content back; it wasn't really there for a lot of 2025. Thanks for your help on the image!! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 13:46, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Promotion of United States v. Moore (1973)

Congratulations, Theleekycauldron! The article you nominated, United States v. Moore (1973), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 23:06, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

As the one who reviewed that article for DYK, congrats on getting it to FAC!! Getting an article expanded 5x (or in this case, 20x) is an achievement on its own, but bringing it to FAC?! I thought this would be eligible for a four award seeing as this was brought to GA before FAC, until I realised that you didn't create the article, which was back in 2010 until you expanded it in 2025. Great work leek! JuniperChill (talk) 23:37, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for helping it along, JuniperChill!! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC)