Choucas
About me 🐦⬛
|
Hello! Welcome to my user talk page. Click Add topic or + New Topic to leave me a message at the bottom of the page. Please remember to link the page you want to discuss and sign your post using ~~~~.It is currently 08:20, 21 July 2026 CEST [refresh] where I am; I may not reply immediately. |
New to Wikipedia? Check out Wikipedia:Five pillars, our core principles, and Wikipedia:Everything you need to know, a simple summary of our most important rules. |
| This page has archives: 2019, 2024, 2025, 2026. |
The Signpost: 21 June 2026
edit- From the editors: Ways for beginners to support The Signpost community journalism
Pointing the way to your contribution to The Signpost!
- News and notes: Community Tech development team disbanded
And English Wikipedia reaches a milestone in number of highly active editors.
- Disinformation report: PR for the people?
Or, "PR using PR for PR"?
- Recent research: Proposed tagging system for AI involvement; successful and unsuccessful AI tools for contributors
And other new research publications.
- In the media: Who won a 14th century battle and who won the 2026 Iran war?
Media take issue with portrayals of recent and medieval history on Wikipedia. Plus a team supporting Wikipedians gets dissolved, and a few other things.
- Community view: Putting the Wish into the Wishlist
A history of the Wikimedia community's request process to Foundation developers.
- In focus: A global standard for Neutral Point of View
Wikipedians are commenting on a proposed global standard for neutral point of view.
- On the bright side: Flowers, blue helmets, reefs, pride, and Juneteenth
Nice things around the world.
- Op-ed: Breathe, Don’t Panic, there is a different story about Wikimedia + AI futures
We can build a strategy about AI that doesn't just center on readers; there are still plenty of humans to write the encyclopedia and work on diverse global knowledge.
- Opinion: Wikimedia Foundation staff develop union and Wikimedia user community reacts
Why should editors support the Wiki Workers United union drive? Lessons the Wikimedia movement can learn from other labor struggles.
- Technology report: Community Tech team is disbanded, controversy erupts
WMF disbands Community Tech, sparking community backlash over the future of the Wishlist and concerns about unionization.
- Traffic report: 'Cause this is thriller, thriller night
Horror movies and Michael Jackson dominate theaters in the lead-up to the World Cup.
- WikiConference report: Report of Volunteer Supporters Network Annual Meeting 2026
Outreach staff of Wikimedia chapters host a global discussion.
- Comix: Take your turn
In a maze of twisty little edits, all alike.
- Humour: Group of banned T-shirt makers comes out of hiding to sell new Wikipedia-themed merchandise
It ain't WikiProject United Nations, but you will find some PUNs.
(This message was sent to User talk:Choucas0 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Question from Ishani Nangia (06:27, 23 June 2026)
editHey Choucas! I want to edit economics-related articles and that is my area of interest as well, but it is not one of the categories listed in wikipedia options, how do I go about it? Thank you! --Ishani Nangia (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hey there @Ishani Nangia, and wecome :) I am not sure what you mean by
listed in wikipedia options
, but in general editing works the same way for all articles more or less. What matters more than the topic itself is what you are trying to do in the area, and how you go about it. Is your main interest working on Draft:Shekhar Aiyar? Choucas 🐦⬛ 12:59, 23 June 2026 (UTC)- Hi Choucas! Thank you for such a prompt response as well. And yes that is my main interest, however the draft got rejected for not having enough information so I will probably take another jab at it. In the meantime if you have any suggestions or tips for me, please let me know. ~2026-36449-20 (talk) 03:54, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hello, first a small tip: remember to log in :) while Wikipedia will let you publish edits logged out, when you already have an active account it is good practice to only do so logged in. Now, regarding your draft, there are two important things I think that you need to be aware of. The first one is our guideline about the notability of people, which is basically a guide into determining if a specific person should have their own Wikipedia article. After looking for a bit, I am not convinced the subject of your draft meets the criteria, so it is unlikely your draft will be accepted. The second important thing here, I think, are our rules around conflict of interest. Of specific interest for you would be the part about paid editing, because it appears you are trying to create this page because it is part of your professional responsibilities. While it is not strictly forbidden, it is still very much frowned upon, so I strongly encourage you to follow the appropriate processes closely. Choucas 🐦⬛ 14:00, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Choucas! Thanks for the tip, I am still getting the hang of things. I have been through the guidelines for notability and my subject does meet the criteria as well, it unfortunately couldn't come across well enough in my first draft. Regarding the conflict of interest, this is not a paid gig for me. The subject was a professor of mine that I really admired and the idea was to get more visibility for his work. However, I completely understand, that this could still come under the conflict of interest policy, but I am curious is there a right way to go about it? Is it possible for me to request another editor to edit and publish my draft to ensure it isn't biased? Ishani Nangia (talk) 05:14, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, regarding the first point: when notability is uncertain, it generally is evaluated by consensus, so while neither me nor you can make a definitive call in advance there, I just wanted to warn you, in case the draft gets rejected, or accepted and then a deletion discussion is started soon after. Regarding the COI, even if you have not been asked explicitly to write this page, the subject of your draft is still the director of the institution where you are employed full-time in a communications and outreach position, which is a clear paid editing situation. The way you have phrased your last comment does not give me confidence that you are being transparent here. In any case, you should not publish your draft yourself; and following COI guidelines, if/once published you should only suggest modifications through edit requests. The draft process is the correct way to go about creating the article in a COI situation. Choucas 🐦⬛ 09:48, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Choucas! Thanks for the tip, I am still getting the hang of things. I have been through the guidelines for notability and my subject does meet the criteria as well, it unfortunately couldn't come across well enough in my first draft. Regarding the conflict of interest, this is not a paid gig for me. The subject was a professor of mine that I really admired and the idea was to get more visibility for his work. However, I completely understand, that this could still come under the conflict of interest policy, but I am curious is there a right way to go about it? Is it possible for me to request another editor to edit and publish my draft to ensure it isn't biased? Ishani Nangia (talk) 05:14, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hello, first a small tip: remember to log in :) while Wikipedia will let you publish edits logged out, when you already have an active account it is good practice to only do so logged in. Now, regarding your draft, there are two important things I think that you need to be aware of. The first one is our guideline about the notability of people, which is basically a guide into determining if a specific person should have their own Wikipedia article. After looking for a bit, I am not convinced the subject of your draft meets the criteria, so it is unlikely your draft will be accepted. The second important thing here, I think, are our rules around conflict of interest. Of specific interest for you would be the part about paid editing, because it appears you are trying to create this page because it is part of your professional responsibilities. While it is not strictly forbidden, it is still very much frowned upon, so I strongly encourage you to follow the appropriate processes closely. Choucas 🐦⬛ 14:00, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Choucas! Thank you for such a prompt response as well. And yes that is my main interest, however the draft got rejected for not having enough information so I will probably take another jab at it. In the meantime if you have any suggestions or tips for me, please let me know. ~2026-36449-20 (talk) 03:54, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Rollback granted
edit
Hi Choucas. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!
I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! TonyBallioni (talk) 17:18, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Temporary account IP viewer granted
edit
Hello, Choucas. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:
- You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
- Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).
It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:
- When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
- Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
- Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with one or more IP addresses (using the CIDR notation format).
Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 17:19, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Question from BoredEktachrome (19:29, 24 June 2026)
edit- Note: BoredEktachrome's mentor The9Man is away.
Hi! For a "normal" article (pretty much the ones not portraying a living person), at what point is a citation required? For instance, for a technical standard, if it has a certain frequency tolerance outside which it breaks down, would i need to cite or i can get away with a ""trust me bro""? Also, how good is working on rephraseing already written content? I'm not very confident on my researching skills yet for "major works". 73s and thanks from BoredEktachrome (talk) 19:29, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hey there @BoredEktachrome, our general policy about what needs referencing and how to go about it is the verifiability policy. You will find a lot of information on that page, and a lot of links to more specific aspects of how verifiability is approached on Wikipedia. Though we are stricter about biographies of living persons as your mention, in general the rule is the same for everything: statements that may be challenged require inline citations to reliable sources. you will get a better idea of what each part of this sentence means, but that's the core idea.
Regarding your second question, it touches on what we call close paragraphing, and the associated copyright concerns. You will find all you need to know about it on this page normally. If you have further or more specific questions, feel free to come back :) Choucas 🐦⬛ 20:34, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
Question from Jojo muzata on Telephone numbers in Argentina (21:26, 25 June 2026)
editI'm single and shearing I looking for women --Jojo muzata (talk) 21:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hello @Jojo muzata, this is the English Wikipedia. Are you sure you're in the right place? Choucas 🐦⬛ 22:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Good Article Gazette, Issue 16
edit
| Ongoing discussions | News | Current statistics |
|---|---|---|
|
|
The Signpost: 13 July 2026
edit- News and notes: An exclusive club
Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
- In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!
- Opinion: We need to innovate with Wikimedia decision-making
Rules we can actually read, trust and change!
- Recent research: LLMs and NPOV, 20 years of user blocks, Esperanto and Volapük Wikipedias
And other research findings.
- News from Diff: How to host Wikicurious in your own community
The Wikicurious team shares their approach to Wiki-event organizing.
- Community view: CUNY Newmark Wikimedian-in-Residence Quarterly Brief – April to June 2026
Quarterly update on the activities of the City University of New York's Wikimedian-in-Residence, Richard Knipel.
- Special report: Wikipedia escapes Category 1 designation under the UK Online Safety Act – for now
A possible future recategorization by the UK Government remains an existential threat to Wikipedia.
- On the bright side: Fatherhood, weather, and diplomacy
Father's Day, Canada Day, and the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence.
- Op-ed: A Layup Easy Proposal for Wikimedia at 25: Spend 25% of Donations on the Community
If strategy priority 1.1 is supporting the community, can we not increase the support to the community? Increasing grantmaking to 25% of the budget would be a move toward equality in the movement.
- Traffic report: The grass was greener, the light was brighter
We reached the dizzy heights of that dreamed of World Cup.
- Comix: schnozzed
on lollerskates
You're invited to the Mentorship noticeboard
editHi, Choucas. You are cordially invited to the brand new Wikipedia:Mentorship noticeboard. I get the impression sometimes that we mentors are each toiling in our own cubbyhole, quietly answering mentee questions with little to no interaction with other mentors. I think we have a lot to share and learn from each other, and I know it will make me feel better just having the opportunity to interact with you and other mentors there, and I hope it will for you, too. Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Please take the § Survey when you get there! Mathglot (talk) 06:39, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
Question from Nicholai-wejè (04:09, 15 July 2026)
editHello? --Nicholai-wejè (talk) 04:09, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Nicholai-wejè, can I help you with something? Choucas 🐦⬛ 11:41, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
- -_- No sorry Choucas. Nicholai-wejè (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
How do I create an information page --Kfdbravo3 (talk) 00:59, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hey @Kfdbravo3, that depends, what do you mean by information page? Choucas 🐦⬛ 10:56, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
Question from Spshineokon on GameMaker (16:28, 18 July 2026)
editHi how can I make a game --Spshineokon (talk) 16:28, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @Spshineokon, this is the English Wikipedia, so not the place to ask for help about that. You will find many communities that can help you online, but not here. Choucas 🐦⬛ 17:00, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
May 2026 Administrator Elections – RFC Phase
editThe RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
(This message was sent to User talk:Choucas0 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Good Article Gazette, Issue 17
edit
| Ongoing discussions | News | Current statistics |
|---|---|---|
|
|
