Talk:Itanium

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Gah4 in topic formerly
Former good articleItanium was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 24, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 17, 2008Good article reassessmentKept
February 21, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Is it correct to mix different measurement units for the same item?

edit

I see that in the two ends of the range indicated for the FSB speed, the first end is expresed in MHz (MegaHertz i.e. millions of cycles per second) and the second one in GT/s (GigaTransfers per second). The two units are not the same and have not the same meaning. Hz is a unit used for referring to cycles per second, and since in one single cycle there can be more than one transfers (e.g. this is the case for DDR SDRAM memory), I deem this way of expressing figures for the same item could be misleading. Corrado72 (talk) 18:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I suppose so, but if that is the way they are specified, then it is probably right here. Gah4 (talk) 10:06, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA concerns

edit

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the GA criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

  • There are lots of uncited statements throughout the article.
  • The "Timeline" section is a duplication of the "History" section: these two sections should be merged.

Is anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Hog Farm Talk 19:00, 21 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

There are many uncited statements. The "Timeline" section is a duplication of the "History" section, and I think the two can be merged. Z1720 (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

formerly

edit

The article says: (formerly called IA-64). When did it stop being called IA-64? Did it get a new name? Gah4 (talk) 10:10, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply