Wikibooks:Requests for deletion: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 128:
:::I will move it and its subpages via [[s:Special:Import]] only one at a time. Please be patient unless someone has any better way.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] ([[User talk:Jusjih|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jusjih|contribs]]) 04:30, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Dan Polansky|L10nM4st3r}}Please see [[s:Wikisource:Administrators'_noticeboard#Mass_import_from_Wikibooks]] with an objection that the book might not be acceptable there. I am not exporting yet.--[[User:Jusjih|Jusjih]] ([[User talk:Jusjih|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jusjih|contribs]]) 19:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Since Wikisource does not want the book due to being self-published (which it does seem to be), I am happy to '''keep it in Wikibooks'''. However, the book should probably start with a heavy disclaimer to the effect that the book contains original research, may be inaccurate or may reflect the point of view of a particular philosopher not accepted by mainstream philosophy. As incorrect as it seems to be, the book seems interesting enough. The book could be assigned in a philosophy course: "Read [[Developing A Universal Religion]] from Wikibooks a identify defects in its arguments"; or the like; a professional educator would probably be able to create a better formulation for an assignment, including perhaps "determine the kind of -isms the book falls under" or "identify authors developing similar themes" (which is more challenging since one needs to know the literature). The book is not much worse than a lot of bad material that passes as "philosophy" is some countries. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 10:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
== [[GRE/All about education in USA]] ==
| |||