-
*
Ackerman, Bruce A. (1971), ‘Regulating Slum Housing Markets on Behalf of the Poor: Of Housing Codes, Housing Subsidies and Income Redistribution Policy’, Yale Law Journal, 80, 1093–1197.
-
*
Ackerman, Bruce A. (1973), ‘More on Slum Housing and Redistribution Policy: A Reply to Professor Komesar’, Yale Law Journal, 82, 1194–1207.
-
*
Albon, Robert P. (1982), ‘Lawyers and the Rental Market for Housing: a Critical Appraisal or a Conversation Between two Academics in a Hotel Bar’, in Ross Cranston and Anne Schick (eds), Law and Economics, Canberra: Australian National University, pp. 105–111.
-
*
Alchian, Armen A. (1963), ‘Some Economics of Property Rights’, Il Politico, 30, 816–829.
-
*
Allen, Douglas and Dean Lueck (1992a), ‘Contract Choice in Modern Agriculture: Cash Rent versus Cropshare’, Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 397–426.
-
*
Allen, Douglas W. and Dean Lueck (1992b), ‘Farmland Leasing in Modern Agriculture’, Choices, The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, 7(1), 30–31.
-
*
Allen, Douglas W. , and Dean Lueck (1993), ‘Transaction Costs and the Design of Cropshare Contracts’, Rand Journal of Economics, 24(1), 78–100.
-
*
Allen, Douglas W. and Dean Lueck (1996), ‘The Transaction Cost Approach to Agricultural Contracts’, in David Martimort (ed.), Agricultural Markets: Mechanisms, Failures, Regulations, Amsterdam: North Holland Press, Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 31–64.
-
*
American Law Institute (2000), Restatement Third, Property (Servitudes), St. Paul, Minnesota, US: American Law Institute.
-
*
Anas, Alex , Goran Cars , Joong Rae Cho , Bjorn Harsman , Ulf Jirlow , and Folke Snickars (1987), The Economics of a Regulated Housing Market, Stockholm: Swedish Council for Building Research.
-
*
Anderson, Terry L. and Dean Lueck (1992), ‘Land Tenure and Agricultural Productivity on Indian Reservations’, Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 427–454.
-
*
Ashauer-Miller, Rena (1997), ‘Dependent Covenants and Commercial Leases After Barton v. Tsern: Rhetoric of Reform Claims an Easy Victory in Utah’, Utah Law Review, 1997, 807–842.
-
*
Banner, Stuart (1999), ‘Two Properties, One Land: Law and Space in Nineteenth-Century New Zealand’, Law and Social Inquiry, 24, 807–852.
-
*
Basu, Kaushik (1989), ‘Technological Stagnation, Tenurial Laws, and Adverse Selection’, American Economic Review, 79, 251–255.
-
*
Bruce, Jon W. and James W. Ely (2001), The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land, Eagan, MN, US: West Group.
-
*
Cheung, Steven N.S. (1969), The Theory of Share Tenancy, Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.
-
*
Coase, Ronald H. (1960), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.
-
*
Coll Martin, Sebastián (1982), ‘La Minería del Carbón en España a Finales del Antiguo Régimen (Coal Mining in Spain at the End of the Old Regime)’, in Pedro Tedde (ed.), La Economía Española al Final del Antiguo Régimen. II, Manofacturas, Madrid: Alianza Editorial, pp. 240–335.
-
*
Cooter, Robert D. (1991), ‘Inventing Market Property: The Land Courts of Papua New Guinea’, Law and Society Review, 25, 759–801.
-
*
Cooter, Robert D. (1992), ‘Organization as Property: Economic Analysis of Property Law and Privatization’, in Christopher Clague and Gordon Rausser (eds), The Emergence of Market Economies in Eastern Europe, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 77–97.
-
*
Dagan, Hanoch and Michael A. Heller (2001), ‘The Liberal Commons’, Yale Law Journal, 110, 549–624.
-
*
Demsetz, Harold (1964), ‘The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights’, Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 11–26.
-
*
Demsetz, Harold (1966), ‘Some Aspects of Property Rights’, Journal of Law and Economics, 9, 61–70.
-
*
Demsetz, Harold (1967), ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’, American Economic Review, 57, 347–359.
-
*
Depoorter, Ben W.F. and Francesco Parisi (2003), ‘Fragmentation of Property Rights: A Functional Interpretation of the Law of Servitudes’, Global Jurist Frontiers, 3 (1) Art. 2.
-
*
Dixon, Kathrine (2007), ‘Working with Mixed Commons/Anticommons Property: Mobilizing Customary Land in Papua New Guinea the Melanesian Way’, Harvard Environmental Law Review, 31, 219–277.
-
*
Dobris, Joel C. (1998), ‘Changes in the Role and the Form of the Trust at the New Millennium, or, We Don’t Have to Think of England Anymore’, Albany Law Review, 62, 543–578.
-
*
Dunham, Allison (1965), ‘Promises Respecting the Use of Land’, Journal of Law and Economics, 8, 133–165.
-
*
Ellickson, Robert C. (1973), ‘Alternatives to Zoning: Covenants, Nuisance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Controls’, University of Chicago Law Review, 40, 683–781. Reprinted in Bruce A. Ackerman (ed.) (1975), Economic Foundations of Property Law, Boston, US: Little Brown, pp. 265–301.
-
*
Ellickson, Robert C. (1982), ‘Cities and Homeowners Associations’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 130, 1519–1580.
-
*
Ellickson, Robert C. (1991), ‘Rent Control: A Comment on Olsen’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 67, 947–954.
-
*
Ellickson, Robert C. (1993), ‘Property in Land’, Yale Law Journal, 102, 1315–1400.
-
*
Epstein, Richard A. (1982), ‘Notice and Freedom of Contract in the Law of Servitudes’, Southern California Law Review, 55, 1353–1368.
-
*
Epstein, Richard A. (1988), ‘Covenants and Constitutions’, Cornell Law Review, 73, 906–927.
-
*
Fennell, Lee Anne (2004), ‘Common Interest Tragedies’, Northwestern University Law Review, 98, 907–990.
-
*
Fischel, William A. (1987), ‘The Economics of Land Use Exactions: A Property Rights Analysis’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 50, 101–113. Reprinted in Jay M. Stein (ed.) (1996), Classic Readings in Real Estate and Development, Washington, DC, US: ULI – the Urban Land Institute.
-
*
Fischel, William A. (1990), Do Growth Controls Matter? A Review of the Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Local Government Land Use Regulation, Cambridge, MA, US: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
-
*
Fitzpatrick, Daniel (2006), ‘Evolution and Chaos in Property Rights Systems: The Third World Tragedy of Contested Access’, Yale Law Journal, 115, 996–1048.
-
*
Flath, David J. (1980), ‘The Economics of Short-Term Leasing’, Economic Inquiry, 18, 247–259.
-
*
Frankena, Mark (1975), ‘Alternative Models of Rent Control’, Urban Studies, 12, 303–308.
-
*
French, Susan F. (2003), ‘Can Covenants Not to Sue, Covenants Against Competition and Spite Covenants Run With Land? Comparing Results Under the Touch or Concern Doctrine and the Restatement Third, Property (Servitudes)’, Real Property, Probate, and Trust Journal, 38, 267–293.
-
*
García Sanz , Angel (1994), ‘El Siglo XVIII: entre la Prosperidad de la Trashumancia y la Critica Antimestaňa de la Ilustración (The Mesta in Spain, XVIIIth Century)’, in Gonzalo A. Alvarez and Angel G. Sanz (eds), Mesta, Trashumancia y vida Pastoril: exposición, Madrid: Sociedad V Centenario del Tratado de Tordesillas, pp. 137–158.
-
*
Goldberg, Victor P. , Thomas W. Merrill and Daniel Unumb (1987), ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of Eminent Domain: Valuing and Apportioning Condemnation Awards Between Landlord and Tenant’, UCLA Law Review, 34, 1083–1137.
-
*
Grossman, Sanford J. and Oliver D. Hart (1986), ‘The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration’, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691–719.
-
*
Hansmann, Henry and Reinier Kraakman (2002), ‘Property, Contract, and Verification: The Numerus Clausus Problem and the Divisibility of Rights’, Journal of Legal Studies, 31, S373–S420.
-
*
Heady, Earl (1947), ‘Economics of Farm Leasing’, Journal of Farm Economics, 29, 659–678.
-
*
Heller, Michael A. (1998), ‘The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets’, Harvard Law Review, 111, 621–688.
-
*
Heller, Michael A. and Rebecca S. Eisenberg (1998), ‘Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research’, Science, 280, 698–701.
-
*
Heller, Michael A. (1999), ‘The Boundaries of Private Property’, Yale Law Journal, 108, 1163–1223.
-
*
Hirsch, Adam J. and William K.S. Wang (1992), ‘A Qualitative Theory of the Dead Hand’, Indiana Law Journal, 68, 1–58.
-
*
Hirsch, Werner Z. (1980), ‘Habitability Laws and the Welfare of Indigent Tenants’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, 263–274.
-
*
Hirsch, Werner Z. (1981), ‘Landlord-Tenant Relations Law’, in Paul Burrows and Cento G. Veljanovski (eds), The Economic Approach to Law, London, UK: Butterworths, pp. 277–306.
-
*
Hirsch, Werner Z. (1983), ‘Effects of Habitability and Anti-Speedy Eviction Laws on Black and Aged Indigent Tenant Groups: An Economic Analysis’, International Review of Law and Economics, 3, 121–135.
-
*
Hirsch, Werner Z. (1984), ‘Comment: From “Food for Thought” to “Empirical Evidence” About Consequences of Landlord-Tenant Laws’, Cornell Law Review, 69, 604–611.
-
*
Hirsch, Werner Z. (1987), ‘Landlord-Tenant Laws and Indigent Black Tenants’, Research in Law and Economics, 10, 129–141.
-
*
Hirsch, Werner Z. , Joel G. Hirsch and S. Margolis (1975), ‘Regression Analysis of the Effects of Habitability Laws Upon Rent: An Empirical Observation on the Ackerman-Komesar Debate’, California Law Review, 63, 1095–1143.
-
*
Hughes, William T., Jr and Geoffrey K. Turnbull (1996), ‘Restrictive Land Covenants’, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 12, 9–21.
-
*
Jaffe, Austin J. (1995), ‘On the Role of Transaction Costs and Property Rights in Housing Markets’, Housing Studies, 11(3), 425–434.
-
*
Johnson, Alex M., Jr (1988), ‘Correctly Interpreting Long-Term Leases Pursuant to Modern Contract Law: Toward a Theory of Relational Leases’, Virginia Law Review, 74, 751–808.
-
*
Johnson, Omotunde E.G. (1972), ‘Economic Analysis: the Legal Framework and Land Tenure Systems’, Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 259–276.
-
*
Kennedy, Duncan (1987), ‘The Effect of the Warranty of Habitability on Low Income Housing: “Milking” and Class Violence’, Florida State University Law Review, 15, 485–519.
-
*
Komesar, Neil K. (1973), ‘Return to Slumville: A Critique of the Ackerman Analysis of Housing Code Enforcement and the Poor’, Yale Law Journal, 82, 1175–1193.
-
*
Korngold, Gerald (1984), ‘Privately Held Conservation Servitudes: A Policy Analysis in the Context of Gross Real Covenants and Easements’, Texas Law Review, 63, 433–495.
-
*
Korngold, Gerald (1990), ‘Resolving the Flaws of Residential Servitudes and Owners Association: for Reformation not Termination’, Wisconsin Law Review, 1990, 513–535.
-
*
Korngold, Gerald (2001), ‘The Emergence of Private Land Use Controls in Large-Scale Subdivisions: The Companion Story to Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.’, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 51, 617–643.
-
*
Krier, James E. (1974), ‘Book Review, reviewing Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (1972)’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 122, 1664–1705.
-
*
Lianos, Theodore P. and Despina Parliarou (1987), ‘Land Tenure in Greek Agriculture’, Land Economics, 63, 237–248.
-
*
Livingston, Marie Leigh and Miller, Thomas A. (1986), ‘A Framework for Analyzing the Impact of Western Instream Water Rights on Choice Domains: Transferability, Externalities, and Consumptive Use’, Land Economics, 62, 269–277.
-
*
Lueck, Dean (1989), ‘The Economic Nature of Wildlife Law’, Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 291–324.
-
*
Lueck, Dean (1991), ‘Ownership and the Regulation of Wildlife’, Economic Inquiry, 29, 249–260.
-
*
Lueck, Dean (1995), ‘The Economic Organisation of Wildlife Institutions’, in Terry L. Anderson and Peter J. Hill (eds), Wildlife in the Market Place, Lanham, MD, US: Rowman and Littlefield Press, Inc.
-
*
Lueck, Dean (1998), ‘Wildlife Law’, in Peter Newman (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, London, UK: Macmillan.
-
*
Lueck, Dean and Philip Schenewerk (1996), ‘An Economic Analysis of Unitized and Non-Unitized Reservoirs’, Proceedings of the 1996 Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference, 67–76.
-
*
Lueck, Dean and Jonathan Yoder (1996), ‘Federalism and Wildlife Conservation in the West’, in Terry L. Anderson and Peter J. Hill (eds), Environmental Federalism in the West, Lanham, MD, US: Rowman and Littlefield Press.
-
*
Markovits, Richard S. (1976), ‘The Distributive Impact, Allocative Efficiency, and Overall Desirability of Ideal Housing Codes: Some Theoretical Clarifications’, Harvard Law Review, 89, 1815–1846.
-
*
Merrill, Thomas W. and Henry E. Smith (2000), ‘Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle’, Yale Law Journal, 110, 1–70.
-
*
Miceli, Thomas J. and C.F. Sirmans (2000), Partition of Real Estate; or, Breaking Up Is (Not) Hard to Do, Journal of Legal Studies, 29 (2), 783.
-
*
Michelman, Frank I. (1982), ‘Ethics, Economics and the Law of Property’, Nomos, 24, 3.
-
*
Moody, C.E., Jr and W.J. Kruvant (1990), ‘OCS Leasing Policy and Lease Prices’, Land Economics, 66, 30–39.
-
*
Moorhouse, John C. (1972), ‘Optimal Housing Maintenance Under Rent Control’, Southern Economic Journal, 39, 93–106.
-
*
Murray, Michael P. , C. Peter Rydell , C. Lance Barnett , Carol E. Hillestad and Kevin Neels (1991), ‘Analyzing Rent Control: The Case of Los Angeles’, Economic Inquiry, 29, 601–625.
-
*
Nelson, Grant S. , William B. Stoebuck and Dale A. Whitman (1996), Contemporary Property, St. Paul, MN, US: West Publishing.
-
*
Nugent, Jeffrey B. and Nicolás Sanchez (1989), ‘The Efficiency of the Mesta: A Parable’, Explorations in Economic History, 26(3), 261–284.
-
*
Olsen, Edgar O. (1972), ‘An Econometric Analysis of Rent Control’, Journal of Political Economy, 80, 1081–1100.
-
*
Olsen, Edgar O. and David M. Barton (1983), ‘The Benefits and Costs of Public Housing in New York City’, Journal of Public Economics, 20, 299–332.
-
*
Ostrom, Elinor (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
-
*
Pardolesi, Roberto (1991), ‘Energia (Energy)’, Digesto civile, VII, 444–448.
-
*
Pigou, A.C. (1932), The Economics of Welfare (4th edn), London, UK: Macmillan, pp. 174–175, 178–183.
-
*
Posner, Richard A. (2007), Economic Analysis of Law (7th edn), New York, US: Aspen.
-
*
Rabin, Edward H. (1984), ‘The Revolution in Residential Landlord-Tenant Law: Causes and Consequences’, Cornell Law Review, 69, 517–584.
-
*
Ramseyer, J. Mark (1989), ‘Water Law in Imperial Japan: Public Goods, Private Claims, and Legal Convergence’, Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 51–77.
-
*
Ramseyer, J. Mark (1996), Odd Markets In Japanese History: Law and Economic Growth, New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
-
*
Reichman, Uriel (1978), ‘Judicial Supervision of Servitudes’, Journal of Legal Studies, 7, 139–164.
-
*
Reichman, Uriel (1982), ‘Toward a Unified Concept of Servitudes’, Southern California Law Review, 55, 1179–1260.
-
*
Robinson, Glen O. (1991), ‘Explaining Contingent Rights: The Puzzle of “Obsolete Covenants”’, Columbia Law Review, 91, 546–580.
-
*
Rose, Carol M. (1998), ‘The Several Futures of Property: Of Cyberspace and Folk Tales, Emission Trades and Ecosystems’, Minnesota Law Review, 83, 129–182.
-
*
Rose, Carol M. (2002), ‘Common Property, Regulatory Property, and Environmental Protection: Comparing Community-Based Management to Tradable Environmental Allowances’, in Elinor Ostrom , et al (eds), The Drama of the Commons, Washington, DC, US: National Academy Press, pp. 233–257.
-
*
Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1985), ‘Inalienability and the Theory of Property Rights’, Columbia Law Review, 85, 931–969.
-
*
Rubin, Paul H. (ed.) (2007), The Evolution of Efficient Common Law, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar.
-
*
Rydell, C. Peter et al. (1981), The Impact of Rent Control on the Los Angeles Housing Market, Santa Monica, CA, US: RAND Corporation.
-
*
Schafer, Robert (1979), ‘Racial Discrimination in the Boston Housing Market’, Journal of Urban Economics, 6, 176–196.
-
*
Schwallie, Daniel P. (1990), ‘Note: The Implied Warranty of Habitability as a Mechanism for Redistributing Income: Good Goal, Bad Policy’, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 40, 525–551.
-
*
Sevic, Zeljko (1996), Law and Economics I: Ekonomska Analiza Prava Svojine u Tranziciji (Law and Economics I: Economic Analysis of the Property Rights in Transition), Pravni Zivot, 45(10), 964–977.
-
*
Shavell, Steven (2004), Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law, Cambridge, MA, US: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
-
*
Siegan, Bernard H. (1972), Land Use without Zoning, Lexington, MA, US: Lexington Books.
-
*
Simpson, A.W.B. (1961), An Introduction to the History of the Land Law, London, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
*
Simpson, A.W.B. (1986), A History of the Land Law (2nd edn), Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. This is the second edition of Simpson (1961).
-
*
Sitkoff, Robert H. (2004), ‘An Agency Costs Theory of Trust Law’, Cornell Law Review, 89, 621–684.
-
*
Solow, Barbara Lewis (1971), The Land Question and the Irish Economy, 1870–1903, Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press.
-
*
Speyrer, Janet Furman (1989), ‘The Effect of Land-Use Restrictions on Market Values of Single-Family Homes in Houston’, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2, 117–130.
-
*
Stake, Jeffrey E. (1988), ‘Toward an Economic Understanding of Touch and Concern’, Duke Law Journal, 1988, 925–974.
-
*
Stake, Jeffrey E. (1990), ‘Darwin, Donations, and the Illusion of Dead Hand Control’, Tulane Law Review, 64, 705–781.
-
*
Stake, Jeffrey E. (1991), ‘Status and Incentive Aspects of Judicial Decisions’, Georgetown Law Journal, 79, 1447–1497.
-
*
Stake, Jeffrey E. (1995), ‘Loss Aversion and Involuntary Transfers of Title’, in Robin P. Malloy and Christopher K. Braun (eds), Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives, New York, US: Peter Lang, pp. 331–360.
-
*
Stake, Jeffrey E. (2001), ‘The Uneasy Case for Adverse Possession’, Georgetown Law Journal, 89, 2419–2474.
-
*
Stake, Jeffrey E. (2005), ‘Evolution of Rules in a Common Law System: Differential Litigation of the Fee Tail and Other Perpetuities’, Florida State University Law Review, 32, 401–424. Reprinted in Paul H. Rubin (ed.) (2007), The Evolution of Efficient Common Law, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar, pp. 460–483.
-
*
Stake, Jeffrey E. (2006), ‘A Brief Comment on Trust Protectors’, Cardozo Law Review, 27, 2813–2819.
-
*
Sterk, Stewart E. (2006), ‘Trust Protectors, Agency Costs, and Fiduciary Duty’, Cardozo Law Review, 27, 2761–2805.
-
*
Valdeon Buruque , Julio (1994), ‘La Mesta y el Pastoreo en Castilla en la Baja Edad Media, 1273–1473 (The Mesta in thmples of the two categories e Low Medieval Age 1273–1473)’, in Gonzalo A. Alvarez and Angel G. Sanz (eds), Mestan Trashumancia y vida Pastoril: Exposición, Madrid, Sociedad V Centenario del Tratado de Tordesillas, pp. 49–64.
-
*
Vlatas, Anthony J. (1994), ‘An Economic Analysis of Implied Warranties of Fitness in Commercial Leases’, Columbia Law Review, 94, 658–709.
-
*
Vogel, Kenneth R. (1987), ‘The Coase Theorem and California Animal Trespass Law’, Journal of Legal Studies, 16, 149–187.
-
*
Williams, Stephen F. (1973), ‘Optimizing Water Use: The Return Flow Issue’, University of Colorado Law Review, 44, 301–321.
-
*
Williams, Stephen F. (1979a), ‘Implied Covenants for Development and Exploration in Oil and Gas Leases – the Determination of Profitability’, Kansas Law Review, 27, 443–458.
-
*
Williams, Stephen F. (1979b), ‘Solar Access and Property Rights: A Maverick Analysis’, Connecticut Law Review, 11, 430–458.
-
*
Williams, Stephen F. (1981), ‘Implied Covenants in Oil and Gas Leases: Some General Principles’, Kansas Law Review, 29, 153–177.
-
*
Williams, Stephen F. (1983), ‘The Requirement of Beneficial Use as a Cause of Waste in Water Resource Development’, Natural Resources Journal, 23, 7–23.
-
*
Williams, Stephen F. (1984), ‘Free Trade in Water Resources: Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. Douglas’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 2, 89–110.
-
*
Williams, Stephen F. (1985), ‘The Law of Prior Appropriation: Possible Lessons for Hawaii’, Natural Resources Journal, 25, 911–934.
-
*
Winokur, James L. (1989), ‘The Mixed Blessings of Promissory Servitudes: Toward Optimizing Economic Utility, Individual Liberty, and Personal Identity’, Wisconsin Law Review, 1989, 1–97.
-
*
Winokur, James L. (1990), ‘Rejoinder: Reforming Servitude Regimes: Toward Associational Federalism and Community’, Wisconsin Law Review, 1990, 537–552.
-
*
Yandle, Bruce and Andrew P. Morriss (2001), ‘The Technologies of Property Rights: Choice Among Alternative Solutions to Tragedies of the Commons’, Ecology Law Quarterly, 28, 123–168.
-
*
Zeiler, Kathryn and Charles R. Plott (2005), ‘The Willingness to Pay/Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations’, American Economic Review, 95(3), 530–545.
-
*
Hodel v. Irving (1987), 481 U.S. 704.
-
*
Kleppe v. New Mexico (1976), 426 U.S. 529.
-
*
London County Council v. Allen (1914), 3 KB 642.
-
*
Palazzolo v. Rhode Island (2001), 533 U.S. 606.
-
*
Sickman v. United States (1950), 184 F.2d 616 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 341 U.S. 939, reh’g denied, 342 U.S. 874 (1951).
-
*
Tulk v. Moxhay (1848), Court of Chancery, 2 Phillips 774, 41 Eng Rep 1143.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your Elgar Online account
