Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article

Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall

  • Theoretical And Review Articles
  • Published: October 2004
  • Volume 11, pages 771–790, (2004)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall
Download PDF
  • Stephan Lewandowsky1,
  • Matthew Duncan1 &
  • Gordon D. A. Brown2 
  • 3300 Accesses

  • 163 Citations

  • 4 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Time-based theories expect memory performance to decline as the delay between study and recall of an item increases. The assumption of time-based forgetting, central to many models of serial recall, underpins their key behaviors. Here we compare the predictions of time-based and event-based models by simulation and test them in two experiments using a novel manipulation of the delay between study and retrieval. Participants were trained, via corrective feedback, to recall at different speeds, thus varying total recall time from 6 to 10 sec. In the first experiment, participants used the keyboard to enter their responses but had to repeat a word (called thesuppressor) aloud during recall to prevent rehearsal. In the second experiment, articulation was again required, but recall was verbal and was paced by the number of repetitions of the suppressor in between retrieval of items. In both experiments, serial position curves for all retrieval speeds overlapped, and output time had little or no effect. Comparative evaluation of a time-based and an event-based model confirmed that these results present a particular challenge to time-based approaches. We conclude that output interference, rather than output time, is critical in serial recall.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Serial recall of colors: Two models of memory for serial order applied to continuous visual stimuli

Article 24 July 2017

Serial dependence is absent at the time of perception but increases in visual working memory

Article Open access 07 November 2017

Effects of temporally regular versus irregular distractors on goal-directed cognition and behavior

Article Open access 15 June 2022

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Long-term Memory
  • Episodic Memory
  • Forgetting
  • Learning and Memory
  • Spike-timing-dependent plasticity
  • Working Memory
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1976).The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Chincotta, D., Stafford, L., &Turk, D. (2002). Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 353–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1993). The recency effect: Implicit learning with explicit retrieval?Memory & Cognition,21, 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaman, C. P. (2002). Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 371–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaman, C. P., &Morton, J. (2000). The separate but related origins of the recency effect and the modality effect in free recall.Cognition,77, B59-B65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A., &Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall.Cognitive Psychology,6, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borowiak, D. S. (1989). Model discrimination for nonlinear regression models. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A., &Chater, N. (2001). The chronological organization of memory: Common psychological foundations for remembering and timing. In C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.),Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 77–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A., &Hulme, C. (1995). Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed?Journal of Memory & Language,34, 594–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2002).SIMPLE: A local distinctiveness model of scale-invariant memory and perceptual identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., &Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order.Psychological Review,107, 127–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A., Vousden, J. I., McCormack, T., &Hulme, C. (1999). The development of memory for serial order: A temporal-contextual distinctiveness model.International Journal of Psychology,34, 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N., &Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing.Psychological Review,106, 551–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., Rochon, E., &Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, D., &Waters, G. S. (1994). Articulatory length and phonological similarity in span tasks: A reply to Baddeley and Andrade.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 1055–1062.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R., &Hille, B. A. (1958). The decay theory of immediate memory and paced recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology,12, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Day, L., Saults, J. S., Keller, T. A., Johnson, T., &Flores, L. (1992). The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., &Elliott, E. M. (2000). Memory-search and rehearsal processes and the word length effect in immediate recall: A synthesis in reply to Service.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 666–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliott, E. M., &Geer, T. (2000). Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 647–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., &Brown, G. D. A. (2004). On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: Separating input and output factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 639–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., Elliott, E. M., &Moreno, M. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N., Wood, N. L., Nugent, L.D., &Treisman, M. (1997). There are two word-length effects in verbal short-term memory: Opposed effects of duration and complexity.Psychological Science,8, 290–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosher, B. A. (1999). Item interference and time delays in working memory: Immediate serial recall.International Journal of Psychology,34, 276–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosher, B. A., &Ma, J. J. (1998). Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 316–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003).The time-course of response suppression for within- and between-list repetitions. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Elvevåg, B., Weinberger, D. R., &Goldberg, T. E. (2001). Shortterm memory for serial order in schizophrenia: A detailed examination of error types.Neuropsychology,15, 128–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, S., &Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, W. J. (2001). Memory processes underlying humans’ chronological sense of the past. In C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.),Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 139–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start—end model.Cognitive Psychology,36, 73–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, R. N. A. (1999). Positional information in short-term memory: Relative or absolute?Memory & Cognition,27, 915–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laming, D. (1992). Analysis of short-term retention: Models for Brown—Peterson experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1342–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S. (1999). Redintegration and response suppression in serial recall: A dynamic network model.International Journal of Psychology,34, 434–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., & Brown, G. D. A. (in press). Serial recall and presentation schedule: A micro-analysis of local distinctiveness.Memory.

  • Lewandowsky, S., &Farrell, S. (2000). A redintegration account of the effects of speech rate, lexicality, and word frequency in immediate serial recall.Psychological Research,63, 163–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., &Li, S.-C. (1994). Memory for serial order revisited.Psychological Review,101, 539–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., &Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1989). Memory for serial order.Psychological Review,96, 25–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S.-C., &Lewandowsky, S. (1993). Intra-list distractors and recall direction: Constraints on models of memory for serial order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 895–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S.-C., &Lewandowsky, S. (1995). Forward and backward recall: Different retrieval processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 837–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2000). The word-length effect and disyllabic words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2002). Output decay in immediate serial recall: Speech time revisited.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maybery, M. T., Parmentier, F. B. R., &Jones, D. M. (2002). Grouping of list items reflected in the timing of recall: Implications for models of serial verbal memory.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 360–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maylor, E. A., Vousden, J., &Brown, G. D. A. (1999). Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: Data and a model.Psychology & Aging,14, 572–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, T., Brown, G. D. A., Vousden, J., &Henson, R. N. A. (2000). Children’s serial recall errors: Implications for theories of short-term memory development.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,76, 222–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch, J. A. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse.Psychological Review,39, 352–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B. (1995). Developing TODAM: Three models for serialorder information.Memory & Cognition,23, 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short term: The case against the standard model.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 53–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., &Serra, M. (1997). Proactive interference plays a role in the word-length effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 541–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I. (1993). Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position functions.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 820–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I. (1999). Modelling the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech on order information.International Journal of Psychology,34, 410–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and distinctiveness in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 316–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1996). Distinctiveness and very shortterm serial position effects.Memory,4, 225–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neath, I., &Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, M. L. H., &Maybery, M. T. (2002). Grouping in short-term verbal memory: Is position coded temporally?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 391–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models.Annual Review of Psychology,43, 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, M. P. A., &Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall.Psychological Review,105, 761–781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (1998). The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 283–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. (2000). Phonological complexity and word duration in immediate recall: Different paradigms answer different questions—A comment on Cowan, Nugent, Elliott, and Geer.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 661–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M. T., Brick, P., &Osborn, J. (1970). Proactive interference in short-term memory as a function of prior-item retention interval.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, N. C., &Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory.Psychological Review,72, 89–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wingfield, A., &Byrnes, D. L. (1972). Decay of information in shortterm memory.Science,176, 690–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 6009, Crawley, WA, Australia

    Stephan Lewandowsky & Matthew Duncan

  2. University of Warwick, Coventry, England

    Gordon D. A. Brown

Authors
  1. Stephan Lewandowsky
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew Duncan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gordon D. A. Brown
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Lewandowsky.

Additional information

This research was supported by a Large Grant from the Australian Research Council to S.L. and an associated Linkage Grant awarded to S.L. and G.D.A.B., and by Grant 88/S15050 from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (U.K.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewandowsky, S., Duncan, M. & Brown, G.D.A. Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 771–790 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196705

Download citation

  • Received: 14 April 2003

  • Accepted: 26 August 2003

  • Issue date: October 2004

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196705

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Retention Interval
  • Serial Position
  • List Item
  • Proactive Interference
  • Serial Recall
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

172.71.120.32

ICE Institution of Civil Engineers (3000167333) - Institution of Civil Engineers Library (2000027800)

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature