Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-688nx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-26T04:52:59.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Origins of Domestic Rye—Secale Cereale: the Finds from Aceramic Can Hasan III in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Gordon Hillman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Wheat, barley and peas, traditional grain-crops of the Western World are, by now, well known to have originated in the Near East. It was the cultivation of the wild ancestors of these crops, beginning soon after the end of the last European Ice Age, that eventually led to an utterly new way of life for most of the population of Europe and Western Asia, a new Neolithic culture based on food production and complete with appropriately adapted tool assemblages and relatively permanent living structures. Soon, from different parts of the Near East, this new pattern of subsistence based on wheats, barleys and pulse crops spread in all directions. One direction led up the Balkan Peninsula and into Central and, eventually, Northern Europe where the Near Eastern, Neolithic, cereal-pulse culture spawned temperate-adapted versions of just the same patterns of subsistence.

Rye, however, has played no part in this story as told to date, this despite the fact that, as Europeans, we automatically associate rye with wheat and barley, the two other providers of our ‘daily bread’.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 28 , December 1978 , pp. 157 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bunting, A.H., 1960. “Some reflections on the ecology of weeds”, in Harper, J.L. ed. The biology of weeds, London, Blackwells.Google Scholar
Darlington, C.D., 1973. Chromosome botany and the origins of cultivated plants, London, Allen and Unwin (3rd ed.).Google Scholar
Dennell, R.W., 1974. “The purity of prehistoric crops”, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 40, 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht, T.H., 1917. “Über die Entstehung des Kulturroggens”, Eduart Hahn Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag, Stuttgart, 19–21.Google Scholar
French, D.H., 1971. “An experiment in water-sieving”, Anatolian Studies XXI, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, D.H. et al. , 1972. “Excavations at Can Hasan III 1969–1970”, in Higgs, E.S. ed. Papers in economic prehistory, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giżbert, W., 1960. “Studium porównawcze nad ziarnami żyta kopalnego (neolit, późny okres rzymski i wczesne średniowiecze)”, Archaeologia Polski V, 81–90. As cited by Klichowska, 1975, op. cit.Google Scholar
Gökgöl, D.M., 1944. “Samen die bei den Ausgrabungen in Alaca Höyük im Jahre 1936 gefunden worden sind”, in Koşay, 1944, op. cit, 185–186.Google Scholar
Helbaek, H., 1961. “Late Bronze Age and Byzantine crops at Beycesultan in Anatolia”, Anatolian Studies XI, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbaek, H., 1964. “First impressions of the Catal Hüyük plant husbandry”, Anatolian Studies XIV, 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbaek, H., 1966. “1966 commentary on the phylogenesis of Triticum and Hordeum”, Economic Botany XX, 350–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helbaek, H., 1971. “The origin and migration of rye, Secale cereale L.; a palaeo-ethnobotanical study”, in Davis, P.H. et al. , eds. Plant life in South-west Asia, Edinburgh, 265–280.Google Scholar
Helbaek, H., 1974. “the Fyrkat grain. A geographical and chronological study of rye”, in Olsen, O., Roesendahl, E. and Schmidt, H.W., Fyrkat. En jysk Vikingeborg, København, 1–41.Google Scholar
Hillman, G.C., 1972. “Plant remains”, in French, 1972, op. cit.Google Scholar
Hillman, G.C., 1975. “The plant remains from Tell Abu Hureyra: a preliminary report”, Appendix A in Moore, A.M.T. et al. , “Excavations at Tell Abu Hureyra in Syria: a preliminary report”, Proc. Prehist. Soc. XLI, 70–73.Google Scholar
Hillman, G.C., (forthcoming) “Food production and the processing of ancient crops: an ethnographic model for interpreting plant remains”, Journal of Archaeological Science (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Hopf, M., 1969. “Plant remains and early farming at Jericho”, in Ucko, P.J., and Dimbleby, G.W. eds. The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals”, Duckworth, London, 355–359.Google Scholar
Klichowska, M., 1959. “Odciski ziarn zbóż i innych gatunków traw na ułamkach naczzyń z neolitycznego stanowiska kultury ceramiki wstȩgowej w Strzelcach w pow. mogileńskim”, (Les empreintes de grains de blé et d'herbes sur les tessons céramiques provenant de la station néolithique de la civilisation de céramique rubanée plus ancienne de Strzelce, district de Mogilno), Fontes Archaeologici Posnaniensis X, 101–105.Google Scholar
Klichowska, M., 1975. “Najstarsze zboża z wykopalisk Polskich”, (“Die ältesten Getreidearten aus den polnishen Ausgrabungen”), Archaeologia Polski XX, 83–143.Google Scholar
Körnicke, F.A., 1885. Secale cereale L. Der Roggen. Handbuch der Getreidebaues I. Berlin, Parey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korošec, J., 1958. Neolitska Naseobina u Danilu Bitinju. Resultati istrazivanja u 1953, godini., (The Neolithic settlement at Danilo-Bitinj. The results of explorations performed in 1953), Zagreb, Jugoslavenska Akademija Znanosti, pp.124–125 and 168.Google Scholar
Koşay, H.Z., 1944. Ausgrabungen von Alaca Hüyük, Ankara.Google Scholar
Kozłowska, A., 1920. “O pszenicach neolitu znalezionych na ziemiach polskich”, Sprawozdania z czynnosci i posiedzeń PAU, Wydz. Matem.-Przypr., XXV, 11–12. As cited by Klichowska, 1975, op. cit.Google Scholar
Kush, G.S., 1962. “Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies in Secale II. Interrelationships of wild species”, Evolution XVI, 484–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kush, G.S., 1963. “Cytogenetic and evolution studies in Secale III. Cytogenetics of weedy ryes and the origin of cultivated ryes”, Economic Botany XVII, 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kush, G.S. and Stebbins, G.L., 1961. “Cytogenetic and evolutionary studies in Secale I. Some new data on the ancestry of S. cereale”, American Journal of Botany XLVIII, 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, V.M., 1961. “The first farmers in Turkmenia”, Antiquity XXXV, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, V.M. and Sarianidi, V.I., 1972. Central Asia. Turkmenia before the Archaemenids, London, chapters 4 and 5.Google Scholar
Moore, A.M.T. et al. , 1975. “The excavation of Tell Abu Hureyra in Syria: a preliminary report”, Proc. Prehist. Soc. XLI, 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regel, C., 1922. “Uber den Ursprung der Getreidearten”, Naturwissenschaftliche Wochenschrift, XXI, 328–330.Google Scholar
Scheibe, A., 1934a. “Über Vorkommen und Nutzungsweise der Wilderbse (Pisum elatius Stev.) und der ‘Wildbohne’ (Vicia narbonensis var. intermedia Strubl) in Anatolien”, Der Züchter VI, 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheibe, A., 1934b. “Die Verbreitung von Unkrautsroggen und Taumellolch in Anatolien (mit bemerkungen zum Roggen-abstammungsproblem)”, Angewandte Botanik XVII, 1–22.Google Scholar
Schiemann, E., 1932. Entstehungder Kulturpflanzen, Berlin, Borntraeger. 174–184.Google Scholar
Schultz, A., 1911. “Die Geschichte des Roggens”, Jahresberichte des Westfälischen Vereins f. Wissenschaft u. Kunst XXXIX, 153–163.Google Scholar
Schwanitz, F., 1966. The origin of cultivated plants, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., (translated from the 1937 German edition).Google Scholar
Sencer, H.Â., 1975. “Study of variation in the genus Secale L. and on the origin of cultivated rye”, Ph.D. thesis submitted to Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Stutz, H.C., 1972. “On the origin of cultivated rye”, American Journal of Botany, LIX, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tempir, Z., 1966. “Výsledky palaeoethnobotanického studia pěstování zemědělských rostlin na území ČSSR” (“Results of palaeoethnobotanic studies on the cultivation of agricultural plants in the CSSR”), Vědecké Práce Československého Zemědělského Muzea 1966, 27–144.Google Scholar
Tempir, Z., 1968. “Archeologické nálezy zemědělských rostlin a plevelů v Čechách a na Moravě”, (“Archaeological finds of agricultural plants and their weeds in Bohemia and Moravia”), Vědecké Práce Československého Zemědělského Muzea 1968, 15–88.Google Scholar
Vavilov, N.I., 1917. “On the origin of cultivated rye”, Bull. Applied Botany and Plant Breeding X, 561–590. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Vavilov, N.I., 1928. “Geographische Genzentren unserer Kulturpflanzen”, Zeitschrift f.induktierte Abstammung-u. Vererbungslehre, Suppl. Bd. 1, 342–369.Google Scholar
Vavilov, N.I., 1931. “The role of Central Asia in the origin of cultivated plants”, Bull. Applied Botany and Plant-Breeding XVI (3), 1–44.Google Scholar
Werneck, H.L., 1951. “Ur- und frühgeschichtliche Roggenfunde in den Ostalpen und am Ostrande des Böhmerwaldes”, Der Züchter, XXI, 107–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werneck, H.L., 1961. “Ur- und frühgeschichtliche sowie mittelalterliche Kulturpflanzen und Hölzer aus den Ostalpen und dem südlichen Böhmerwald”, Archaeologia Austriaca XXX, 69–117.Google Scholar
Yanushevich, Z.V., 1975. “Fossil remains of cultivated plants in the south-west of the Soviet Union”, Folia Quaternaria XLVI, 23–30 (+ 1 plate).Google Scholar
Yanushevich, Z.V., 1976. Cultivated plants of south-western USSR from palaeobotanical investigations, Kishinev, Akademia Nauk Moldavskoi SSR – Botanicheskii Sad. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
van Zeist, W., 1972. “Palaeobotanical results of the 1970 season at Çayönü, Turkey”, Helenium XII, 3–19.Google Scholar
van Zeist, W., 1976. “Two early rye finds from the Netherlands”, Acta Botanica Neerlandica XXV, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zeist, W. and Bottema, S., 1966. “Palaeobotanical investigations at Ramad”, Annales Archéologiques Arabes Syriennes XVI, 179–180.Google Scholar
van Zeist, W. and Casparie, W.A., 1968. “Wild einkorn wheat from Tell Mureybit in northern Syria”, Acta Botanica Neerlandica XVII, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhukovskiĭ, P.M., 1933. Türkiyenin Zirai Bünyesi, Ankara, Türkıye Şeker Fabrikaları A.S. Neşriyatı No. 20. (Turkish translation of the original Russian – Zemledelcheskaya Tutsiya, Leningrad).Google Scholar
Zhukovskiĭ, P.M., 1950. Cultivated plants and their wild relatives, Leningrad, Akademia Nauk, USSR. (Abridged translation by Hudson, P.S., 1962. Cambridge, Commonwealth Bureaux of Agriculture.)Google Scholar
Zhukovskiĭ, P.M., 1971. Kul'turnye Rasteniya i ich Sorodichi, (Cultivated Plants and their Relatives), Leningrad, Izdatelstvo ‘Kolos’. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Zeven, A.C. and Zhukovskiĭ, P.M., 1975. Dictionary of cultivated plants and their centres of diversity, Wageningen, Centre for Agricultural Publication.Google Scholar
Zohary, D., 1971. “Origin of south-west Asiatic cereals: wheats, barley, oats and rye”, in Davis, P.H. et al. , eds., Plant life in south-west Asia, Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 235–263.Google Scholar