Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 1, 2008

Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in Reflexive Categorization of Racially Ambiguous Faces

Abstract

Historically, the principle of hypodescent specified that individuals with one Black and one White parent should be considered Black. Two experiments examined whether categorizations of racially ambiguous targets reflect this principle. Participants studied ambiguous target faces accompanied by profiles that either did or did not identify the targets as having multiracial backgrounds (biological, cultural, or both biological and cultural). Participants then completed a speeded dualcategorization task requiring Black/not Black and White/not White judgments (Experiments 1 and 2) and deliberate categorization tasks requiring participants to describe the races (Experiment 2) of target faces. When a target was known to have mixed-race ancestry, participants were more likely to rapidly categorize the target as Black (and not White); however, the same cues also increased deliberate categorizations of the targets as “multiracial.” These findings suggest that hypodescent still characterizes the automatic racial categorizations of many perceivers, although more complex racial identities may be acknowledged upon more thoughtful reflection.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

REFERENCES

Banks R.R., Eberhardt J.L. (1998). Social psychological processes and the legal bases of racial categorization. In Eberhardt J.L., Fiske S.T. (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 54–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Brunsma D.L. (2006). Public categories, private identities: Exploring regional differences in the biracial experience. Social Science Research, 35, 555–576.
Eberhardt J.L., Dasgupta N., Banaszynski T.L. (2003). Believing is seeing: The effects of racial labels and implicit beliefs on face perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 360–370.
Harris M. (1964). Patterns of race in the Americas. New York: Doubleday.
Herman M. (2004). Forced to choose: Some determinants of racial identification in multiracial adolescents. Child Development, 75, 730–748.
Hirschfeld L.A. (1996). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child's construction of human kinds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hugenberg K., Bodenhausen G.V. (2004). Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in racial categorization. Psychological Science, 15, 342–345.
Levin D.T., Banaji M.R. (2006). Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: The role of race categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 501–512.
MacLin O.H., Malpass R.S. (2001). Racial categorization of faces: The ambiguous race face effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 98–118.
Macrae C.N., Bodenhausen G.V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120.
Minear M., Park D.C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630–633.
Rothbart M., Taylor M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In Semin G., Fiedler K. (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 11–36). London: Sage.
Shih M., Sanchez D.T. (2005). Perspectives and research on the positive and negative implications of having multiple racial identities. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 569–591.
White J.K. (2006). Barack Obama and the politics of race. Retrieved June 28, 2007, from http://www.drpsychobabel.com/?page_id=30