Abstract
Individual sea turtle nests have an extremely low probability of producting adult turtles; thus the practice of moving nests away from the ocean (where they will not be inundated by seawater) is a questionable conservation strategy. Recently in Environmental Management, Mrosovosky used the repeatability of nesting female turtles to place their eggs in certain locations to infer that some females may consistently nest in areas which will be flooded, lowering the chance that any eggs will hatch. This information was used to hypothesize that saving “doomed” sea turtle nests may then alter the genetic composition of the population, ultimately resulting in turtles that nest in poor habitats. Here I question Mrosovosky’s argument by focusing on several weaknesses inherent in the original article, namely that at present there is no evidence to suggest that nest-site selection is a heritable trait with an underlying genetic basis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouchard SS, Bjorndal KA (2000) Sea turtles as biological transporters of nutrients and energy from marine to terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology 81:2305–2313
Campbell LM, Smith C (2006) What makes them pay? Values of volunteer tourists working for sea turtle conservation. Environmental Management 38:84–98
Caputo FP, Canestrelli D, Boitani L (2005) Conserving the terecay (Podocnemis unifilis, Testudines: Pelomedusidae) through a community-based sustainable harvest of its eggs. Biological Conservation 126:84–92
Congdon JD, Gibbons JW (1990) In Gibbons JW (ed.), Life history and ecology of the slider turtle. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. pp 45–54
Congdon JD, Nagle RD, Kinney OM, van Loben Sels RC, Quinter T, Tinkle DW (2003) Testing hypotheses of aging in long-lived painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). Experimental Gerontology 38:765–772
Darwin C (1859) The origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray, London, UK
Frazer NB (1986) Survival from egg to adulthood in a declining population of loggerhead turtles, Caretta caretta. Herpetologica 42:47–55
Heppell SS (1998) Application of life-history theory and population model analysis to turtle conservation. Copeia 1998:367–375
Lee DNB, Snepenger DJ (1992) An ecotourism assessment of Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Annals of Tourism Research 11:367–370
Miller JK (2001) Escaping senescence: demographic data from the three-toed box turtle (Terrapene carolina triunguis). Experimental Gerontology 36:829–832
Mrosovsky N (2006) Distorting gene pools by conservation: assessing the case of doomed turtle eggs. Environmental Management 38:523–531
Shanker K, Kutty R (2005) Sailing the flagship fantastic: myth and reality of sea turtle conservation in India. Maritime Studies 3:213–240
Tisdell C, Wilson C (2002) Ecotourism for the survival of sea turtles and other wildlife. Biodiversity and Conservation 11:1521–1538
Tisdell C, Wilson C (2005) Perceived impacts of ecotourism on environmental learning and conservation: turtle watching as a case study. Environment, Development and Sustainability 7:291–302
Tisdell C, Wilson C, Nantha HS (2005) Association of public support for survival of wildlife species with their likeability. Anthrozoös 18:160–174
Tisdell C, Wilson C, Nantha HS (2006) Public choice of species for the “Ark”: phylogenetic similarity and preferred wildlife species for survival. Journal for Nature Conservation 14:97–105
Weishampel JF, Bagley DA, Ehrhart LM, Rodenbeck BL (2003) Spatiotemporal patterns of annual sea turtle nesting behaviors along an east central Florida beach. Biological Conservation 110:295–303
Acknowledgments
During manuscript preparation, I was supported by an Australian Endeavour International Postgraduate Research Scholarship, a University of Sydney International Postgraduate Award, and by R. Shine through the Australian Research Council. I thank E. Roznik, K. Shanker, and two anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pike, D.A. The Benefits of Nest Relocation Extend Far Beyond Recruitment: A Rejoinder to Mrosovsky. Environmental Management 41, 461–464 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0434-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0434-0