Abstract
Volume visualization is gaining widespread acceptance in medical applications. As its use increases, the issue of accuracy becomes critical. There have been very few studies examining the accuracy of volume rendering techniques. We studied the accuracy of hardware-assisted volume rendering for measurement of arterial stenosis in computed tomography (CT) data. The results of our study reveal that accurate measurements can be made from volume rendered CT data. However, error is present (absolute average error from 5.1% to 13.6%) and there is some variability, even for experts (standard deviation ranged from 4.8% to 15%). The evidence suggests that the choice of volume rendering (transfer function) parameters greatly affects the accuracy of the results. Accurate transfer function parameter selection is a fiddicult problem. Parameters that produce realistic images often provide inaccurate measurements. As the use of volume visualization grows and more inexperienced users begin using these tools for medical diagnosis and staging, new guidelines, aids, and techniques must be developed to ensure reliable, accurate visualization results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cabral B, Cam N, Foran J: Accelerated volume rendering and tomographic reconstruction using texture mapping hardware, in Kaufman A and Krueger W, (eds): 1994 Symposium on Volume Visualization, New York, NY, ACM Siggraph, 1994, pp. 91–98.
Machiraju R, Yagel R: Reconstruction error characterization and control: A sampling theory approach. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2:364–378, 1996
Marschner SR, Lobb RJ: An evaluation of reconstruction filters for volume rendering. Proc IEEE Visual 94:100–107, 1994
Drebin RA, Magid D, Robertson DD, et al: Fidelity of three dimensional CT imaging for detecting fracture gaps. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:487–489, 1989
Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Bliss DF, et al: Skeletal 3-D CT: Advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering. Skeletal Radiol 25:207–214, 1996
Dillon E, Leeuwen MV, Fernandez M, et al: CT angiography: Application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Radiology 189:211–219, 1993
Link J, Brossman J, Penselin V, et al: Common carotid artery bifurcation: Preliminary results of CT angiography and color-coded duplex sonography compared with digital subtraction angiography, AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:361–365, 1997
Takahashi M, Ashtari M, Patel M, et al: CT angiography of carotid bifurcation: Artifacts and pitfalls in shaded surface display. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:813–817, 1997
Rubin G, Dake M, Napel S, et al: Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: Comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 190:181–189, 1994
Fishman EK, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, et al: Sargical planning for liver resection. IEEE Computer 29:64–72, 1995
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebert, D.S., Heath, D.G., Kuszyk, B.S. et al. Evaluating the potential and problems of three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of arterial stenosis. J Digit Imaging 11, 151 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168738
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168738

