Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the potential and problems of three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of arterial stenosis

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volume visualization is gaining widespread acceptance in medical applications. As its use increases, the issue of accuracy becomes critical. There have been very few studies examining the accuracy of volume rendering techniques. We studied the accuracy of hardware-assisted volume rendering for measurement of arterial stenosis in computed tomography (CT) data. The results of our study reveal that accurate measurements can be made from volume rendered CT data. However, error is present (absolute average error from 5.1% to 13.6%) and there is some variability, even for experts (standard deviation ranged from 4.8% to 15%). The evidence suggests that the choice of volume rendering (transfer function) parameters greatly affects the accuracy of the results. Accurate transfer function parameter selection is a fiddicult problem. Parameters that produce realistic images often provide inaccurate measurements. As the use of volume visualization grows and more inexperienced users begin using these tools for medical diagnosis and staging, new guidelines, aids, and techniques must be developed to ensure reliable, accurate visualization results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cabral B, Cam N, Foran J: Accelerated volume rendering and tomographic reconstruction using texture mapping hardware, in Kaufman A and Krueger W, (eds): 1994 Symposium on Volume Visualization, New York, NY, ACM Siggraph, 1994, pp. 91–98.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Machiraju R, Yagel R: Reconstruction error characterization and control: A sampling theory approach. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2:364–378, 1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marschner SR, Lobb RJ: An evaluation of reconstruction filters for volume rendering. Proc IEEE Visual 94:100–107, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drebin RA, Magid D, Robertson DD, et al: Fidelity of three dimensional CT imaging for detecting fracture gaps. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13:487–489, 1989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Bliss DF, et al: Skeletal 3-D CT: Advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering. Skeletal Radiol 25:207–214, 1996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dillon E, Leeuwen MV, Fernandez M, et al: CT angiography: Application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Radiology 189:211–219, 1993

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Link J, Brossman J, Penselin V, et al: Common carotid artery bifurcation: Preliminary results of CT angiography and color-coded duplex sonography compared with digital subtraction angiography, AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:361–365, 1997

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takahashi M, Ashtari M, Patel M, et al: CT angiography of carotid bifurcation: Artifacts and pitfalls in shaded surface display. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:813–817, 1997

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubin G, Dake M, Napel S, et al: Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: Comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 190:181–189, 1994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fishman EK, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, et al: Sargical planning for liver resection. IEEE Computer 29:64–72, 1995

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebert, D.S., Heath, D.G., Kuszyk, B.S. et al. Evaluating the potential and problems of three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of arterial stenosis. J Digit Imaging 11, 151 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168738

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168738

Key words