Abstract
In this article I discuss the theory of the earth's shape presented by Isaac Newton in Book III of his Principia. I show that the theory struck even the most reputable continental mathematicians of the day as incomprehensible. I examine the many obstacles to understanding the theory which the reader faced — the gaps, the underived equations, the unproven assertions, the dependence upon corollaries to practically incomprehensible theorems in Book I of the Principia and the ambiguities of these corollaries, the conjectures without explanations of their bases, the inconsistencies, and so forth. I explain why these apparent drawbacks are, historically considered, strengths of Newton's theory of the earth's shape, not weaknesses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by C. Truesdell
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenberg, J.L. Isaac Newton and the problem of the earth's shape. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 49, 371–391 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374704
Received:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374704
