Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2026
  3. Conference paper

Abstract: Annotation-efficient 3D Body Composition Segmentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online: 12 March 2026
  • pp 465
  • Cite this conference paper
Save conference paper
View saved research
Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2026 (BVM 2026)
Abstract: Annotation-efficient 3D Body Composition Segmentation
  • Lena Philipp  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-2742-70419,
  • Maarten de Rooij9,
  • John Hermans9,
  • Matthieu Rutten9,
  • Horst Hahn10,
  • Bram van Ginneken9 &
  • …
  • Alessa Hering  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-803X9 

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Included in the following conference series:

  • BVM Workshop
  • 340 Accesses

Abstract

Quantifying body composition from computed tomography (CT) provides valuable insights into metabolic health, disease prognosis, and treatment outcomes. However, the development of 3D segmentation models for body composition analysis has been limited by the extensive manual annotation effort required. We present an annotation-efficient strategy for 3D segmentation of abdominal and pelvic body composition [1], designed to drastically reduce annotation needs while maintaining high accuracy. Our approach combines sparse manual annotations with an iterative self-learning framework that transitions from 2D to 3D segmentation. Only 1% of all training slices were manually annotated. The model was trained on 116 CT scans and evaluated on an internal test set of 20 scans and a reader study of 100 cases. Quantitative performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient. To further assess generalizability and clinical reliability, a multi-reader evaluation was conducted by three experienced radiologists using a standardized scoring protocol to rate the correction effort per segmentation class. The final 3D model achieved Dice coefficients of 0.97 ± 0.01 for skeletal muscle (SM), 0.85 ± 0.04 for inter-/intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), 0.94 ± 0.04 for visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and 0.98 ± 0.01 for subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Reader study results confirmed negligible to minimal correction effort for SM, VAT, and SAT, with higher variability for IMAT. These results indicate strong robustness and demonstrate the feasibility of developing accurate 3D body composition models with minimal annotation effort.

Download to read the full chapter text

Chapter PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

Fully automated body composition analysis in routine CT imaging using 3D semantic segmentation convolutional neural networks

Article Open access 18 September 2020

Reproducibility of semiautomated body composition segmentation of abdominal computed tomography: a multiobserver study

Article Open access 30 October 2019

Comparison between automated and manual segmentation in computed tomography for body composition analysis

Article Open access 20 February 2026

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Brain Mapping
  • Computed Tomography
  • Whole Body Imaging
  • X-ray Tomography
  • Biomechanical Analysis and Modeling
  • 3-D Image Reconstruction

References

  1. Philipp L, de Rooij M, Hermans J, Rutten M, van Ginneken B, Hering A. Annotationefficient strategy for segmentation of 3D body composition. Proc MIDL. 2024.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands

    Lena Philipp, Maarten de Rooij, John Hermans, Matthieu Rutten, Bram van Ginneken & Alessa Hering

  2. Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany

    Horst Hahn

Authors
  1. Lena Philipp
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maarten de Rooij
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Hermans
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthieu Rutten
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Horst Hahn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bram van Ginneken
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alessa Hering
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena Philipp.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Deutschland

    Heinz Handels

  2. Center for Artificial Intelligence and Data Science (CAIDAS), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland

    Katharina Breininger

  3. Peter L. Reichertz Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Technische Universität Braunschweig und Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Braunschweig, Niedersachsen, Deutschland

    Thomas Deserno

  4. Lehrstuhl für Mustererkennung, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Bayern, Deutschland

    Andreas Maier

  5. Medical Image Computing E230, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Deutschland

    Klaus Maier-Hein

  6. Fakultät für Informatik und Mathematik, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg, Regensburg, Bayern, Deutschland

    Christoph Palm

  7. Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Thomas Tolxdorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2026 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Philipp, L. et al. (2026). Abstract: Annotation-efficient 3D Body Composition Segmentation. In: Handels, H., et al. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2026. BVM 2026. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-51100-5_92

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-51100-5_92

  • Published: 12 March 2026

  • Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-51099-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-51100-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)Springer Nature Proceedings excluding Computer Science

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

104.23.197.170

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature