Abstract
While the story of the Ugaritic Baal Cycle has traditionally been interpreted either in terms of natural phenomena in conflict or as the triumph of order out of primordial chaos, new views have also discussed its contents in relationship with the historical situation of the city of Ugarit in the tug-of-war between the Egyptian and Hittite empires in the Late Bronze Age. Recently, the interpersonal relationships of the gods in the story have also been used to garner information on the political landscape of the era, especially of the Ugaritic vassalage under the Hittites, functioning as a critical commentary on the prevailing political order. But as the story contains timeless aspects and very little historical detail, being itself an iteration of a myth that has its origins in the Middle Bronze Age Amorite Kingdom period, its usefulness in recreating real world political tensions at the tail-end of the Late Bronze Age must be questioned, especially in light of the difficulty in dating the Ugaritic story. This article suggests that while the myth may incidentally reflect the history and political situation of the Eastern Mediterranean in the Late Bronze Age, its main function was in the legitimation of established power relationships and in the resolution of the crisis of monarchy itself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a general introduction to Ugarit, see Yon (2006).
- 2.
- 3.
Schniedewind and Hunt (2007).
- 4.
- 5.
The discovery of the texts was followed by the decipherment of the cuneiform alphabet and the provisional translations of the principal texts between the years 1929 and 1932. Curtis (1985: 18–33).
- 6.
Comparisons between Ugaritic and Hebrew texts have been made e.g. in the Ras Shamra Parallels I–III (1972–1981), edited by Loren Fisher and Stan Rummel.
- 7.
For a study on the Storm-god in the ancient Near East, see Green (2003).
- 8.
For a re-assessment of these classic theories, see J. Scurlock and R. Beal (eds.). 2013. Chaos and Cosmos: A Reconsideration of Herman Gunkel’s Chaoskampf Hypothesis and R. S. Watson. 2005. Chaos Uncreated: A Reassessment of the Theme of “Chaos” in the Hebrew Bible.
- 9.
Astour (1981).
- 10.
Smith has discussed the topic e.g. in The Baal Cycle, vols I and II (1994, 2009), “Interpreting the Ba‘al Cycle” in Ugarit Forschungen 18 (1986), and The Early History of God (1990) and in many others. Wyatt has likewise discussed the political nature of the text in many books and articles, among them The Religious Texts from Ugarit (2002), Myths of Power: A Study of Royal Myth and Ideology in Ugaritic and Biblical Tradition (1996), Ilimilku’s Ideological Programme: Ugaritic Royal Propaganda, and a Biblical Postscript (1997) and The Religious Role of the King in Ugarit (2005).
- 11.
Wyatt (2007: 50–51, 2005: 251–252). See also Smith (2001: 159). Something that may be used to argue against the idea of the Baal Cycle as a royal wedding song is that none of the tablets were found in the palace archives, but were instead found in the so-called Library of the High Priest, the area of the scribal school adjunct to the temples of Ugarit. See De Langhe (1958: 141). It could be argued that it was not only the royal family that needed to be educated in the political mythology, but perhaps even more importantly the administrative elite, as the indoctrination of the dynastic line most likely took place organically in the daily life of the court.
- 12.
Wyatt (2007: 50).
- 13.
Astour (1980).
- 14.
Astour (1981: 23). Astour argues that the Ugaritic intellectuals were simply not interested in Hittite culture.
- 15.
- 16.
Singer (1990: 730).
- 17.
His review of these theories can be found in Smith (1994, 60ff).
- 18.
Smith (1994: 105).
- 19.
In “Baal Is Our King”: Politics and Narrative at the End of the Bronze Age (2012).
- 20.
Tugendhaft (2012: 368).
- 21.
Tugendhaft (2012: 369).
- 22.
Tugendhaft (2012: 368–369).
- 23.
Sasson (2001: 329, 2013: 121, 2014: 675). According to Sasson, kinship terminology (vertical relationships with father and son, lateral relationships with brother and older brother) was commonly used as a metaphor for political allegiance in the Old Babylonian diplomatic circles. He suggests that the familiar terminology “must have been crystal clear to the people of the time; but it could be confusing to us, leading us to reconstruct false relationships, whether we take the vocabulary to be about kinship or power. In fact, the circumstances under which one was permitted to call another ‘brother’ rather than ‘father’ were controlled by an elaborate protocol—”. This protocol was a “deadly serious matter”. To find kinship terms in these texts is not to suggest actual genealogical relationships between the actors, but relationships of power. It should also be mentioned that these relationships were not always voluntary.
- 24.
Bryce (2004: 82).
- 25.
Consult Töyräänvuori (2018).
- 26.
- 27.
Linder (1981, 40–41).
- 28.
Linder (1981, 36, 39).
- 29.
- 30.
Töyräänvuori (2018).
- 31.
Jack Sasson: The King and I: A Mari King in Changing Perceptions in JAOS 118 (1998): 455.
- 32.
Molly Andrews et al.: The Uses of Narrative: Explorations in Sociology, Psychology, and Cultural Studies (2004).
- 33.
The effects of the Second World War on Ugaritic scholarship have been discussed by Smith (2001: 36), Vidal (2014). Sasson (1998: 454), also discusses the early years of the research into Mari texts in the shadows of the Second World War, and how the history of the city and its king were fashioned as a kind of morality tale.
- 34.
- 35.
- 36.
- 37.
Sasson (1998: 458).
- 38.
The Idrimi inscription was published by Oppenheim (1969: 557–558). Oppenheim observed parallels between Idrimi and David. The accession number of the statue on which the inscription is written is BM 130738.
- 39.
Stories of the Biblical David-Cycle are mostly found in 1 and 2 Samuel and 1 Kings in the Hebrew Bible.
- 40.
Sasson (1998: 455).
- 41.
On the nature of ancient historiography, see Michael Grant: Greek and Roman Historians: Information and Misinformation (1995).
- 42.
Although he references Medieval Europe, Keith Yandell’s quote from Faith and Narrative (2001) is apt: “We should recall that in medieval Europe literacy and administration were two sides of the same coin. Writing was a political act, the written record a legal rule.” (p. 31).
- 43.
While I have issued caution with his conclusions in the past, this is what Aaron Tugendhaft attempts in “Baal Is Our King”, using the myth of the Baal Cycle in discussing the political landscape of the Late Bronze Age.
- 44.
Redford (1992: 48), writes: “We must remember, however, the very simple nature of the plot of these tales as well as the mutual awareness and interconnection through trade and travel enjoyed by communities around the Levantine and African coasts from time immemorial. We are, in fact, plummeted back to a prehistoric age if we seek to identify in time and place the point of origin of the story. It would be a bootless search.”
- 45.
See Cruz and Frijhoff (2009).
- 46.
The texts from Ugarit are published in the third edition of Die Keilalphabetischen Texte aus Ugarit (2013), edited by M. Dietrich & O. Loretz & J. Sanmartín. The texts are arranged by type.
- 47.
Gérard Bouchard: Pour une nouvelle sociologie des mythes sociaux in RESS 1 (2013) outlines an empirical and theoretical approach to the sociology of myths, opining that the study of myths is neglected in modern sociological research. The same is true of historical studies, where myths are relegated to the study of the history of literature.
- 48.
Suriano (2009: 121).
- 49.
Regarding the former, see Töyräänvuori (2017).
- 50.
- 51.
- 52.
Suriano (2010: 140ff).
- 53.
More on this topic in Töyräänvuori (2018).
- 54.
Bibliography
Astour, Michael C. 1980. King Ammurapi and the Hittite Princess. Ugarit Forschungen 12: 102-108.
Astour, Michael C. 1981. “Ugarit and the Great Powers.” In Ugarit in Retrospect: 50 years of Ugarit and Ugaritic. Ed. Gordon D. Young. 3-29. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
Bryce, Trevor. 2004. Letters of the Great Kings of the Ancient Near East: The Royal Correspondence of the Late Bronze Age. London: Routledge.
Bryce, Trevor. 2006. 'The 'Eternal Treaty' from the Hittite perspective. British Museum Studies in Ancient Egypt and Sudan 6: 1-11. http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk/bmsaes/issue6/bryce.html
Cruz, Laura and Frijhoff, Willem (Eds.). 2009. Myths in History, History in Myth. (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 182). Leiden: Brill.
Curtis, Adrian. 1985. Ugarit (Ras Shamra). Cities of the Biblical World. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.
De Langhe, R. 1958. Myth, Ritual, and Kingship in the Ras Shamra Tablets. Myth, Ritual, and Kingship. Ed. S. H. Hooke. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 122-148.
Dietrich, Manfried. 2003. Salmanassar I. von Assyrien, Ibirānu (VI.) von Ugarit und Tudḫalija IV. von Hatti. Ugarit Forschungen 35: 103-139.
Dietrich, Manfried, Loretz, Oswald and Sanmartín, Joaquin. 2013. Die keilalphabetischen Texte aus Ugarit, Ras ibn Hani und anderen Orten (=KTU). Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.
Gibson, John C. L. 1999-2000. “Death in Canaanite Thinking”. Aula Orientalis 17-18: 91-95.
Green, Alberto R. W. 2003. The Storm-God in the Ancient Near East. (Biblical and Judaic Studies Vol. 8). Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. 1957. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study on Medieval Political Theology. Princeton UP.
Lambrou-Phillipson, Connie. 1993. “Ugarit: A Late Bronze Age thalassocracy? The evidence of the textual sources.” Orientalia 62.3:163-170.
Linder, E. 1981. Ugarit: A Canaanite Thalassocracy. In Ugarit in Retrospect: Fifty Years of Ugarit and Ugaritic. Ed. Gordon D. Young. 31-42. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Niehr, Herbert. 2015. “The King’s Two Bodies: Political Dimensions of the Royal Cult of the Dead at Ugarit, Byblos and Qatna.” In Qatna and the Networks of Bronze Age Globalism. Ed. P. Pfälzner and M. al-Maqdissi. 157-177. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Oppenheim, A. L. 1969. The Story of Idrimi, King of Alalakh. The Ancient Near East Supplementary Texts and Pictures Relating to the Old Testament. Ed. J. Pritchard. 557-578. Princeton, NJ: UP.
Palyvou, Clairy. 2007. “The Cosmopolitan Harbor of Ugarit and the Aegean Aspects of its Domestic Architecture.” In Krinoi kai Limenes: Studies in Honor of Joseph and Maria Shaw. Ed. Philip P. Betancourt, Michael C. Nelson and Hector Williams. 31-47. Philadelphia, PA: Prehistory monographs 22.
Redford, Donald B. 1992. Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
Sasson, Jack M. 1998. The King and I a Mari King in Changing Perceptions. Journal of the American Oriental Society 118/4: 453-470.
Sasson, Jack. 2001. On Reading the Diplomatic Letters in the Mari Archives. Amurru 2: 329-338.
Sasson, Jack. 2013. “It is for this reason that I have not come down to my lord…” Visit Obligations and Vassal Pretexts in the Mari Archives. Revue d’assyriologie et d’archélogie orientale 107: 119-129.
Sasson, Jack. 2014. Casus belli in the Mari Archives. In Krieg und Frieden im Alten Vorderasien (52e RAI). Eds. H. Neumann, R. Dittmann, S. Paulus, G. Neumann and A. Schuster-Brandis. 673-690. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.
Schmidt, Brian B. 1994. Israel's Beneficent Dead: Ancestor Cult and Necromancy in Ancient Israelite Religion and Tradition. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Schniedewind, William M. and Hunt, Joel H. 2007. A Primer on Ugaritic Language, Culture, and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Singer, Itarmar. 1990. A Political History of Ugarit. A Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Eds. W. G. E. Watson and N. Wyatt. 603-733. Leiden: Brill.
Smith, Mark S. 1994. The Ugaritic Ba‛al Cycle: Volume I: Introduction with Text, Translation and Commentary of KTU 1.1-1.2. (Vetus Testamentum Supplements 55). Leiden: Brill.
Smith, Mark S. 2001. The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel’s Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stolz, Fritz. 1982. Funktionen und Bedeutungsbereiche des ugarititischen Ba‛almythos. Funktionen und Leistungen des Mythos: Drei altorientalische Beispiele. Ed. J. Assman et al. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 48: 83-118.
Suriano, Matthew. 2009. “Dynasty Building at Ugarit: The Ritual and Political Context of KTU 1.161.” Aula Orientalis 27:105-123.
Suriano, Matthew J. 2010. The Politics of Dead Kings: Dynastic Ancestors in the Book of Kings and Ancient Israel. Forschungen zum Alten Testament 2. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Töyräänvuori, Joanna. 2017. “The Royal Adoption Scene in Ugaritic and Biblical Texts.” In Fortune and Misfortune in the Ancient Near East (Proceedings of the 60th RAI, Warsaw, 2014). Ed. Małgorzata Sandowicz and Olga Drewnowska. 247-258 Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
Töyräänvuori, Joanna. 2018. Sea and the Combat Myth: North West Semitic Political Mythology in the Hebrew Bible. (AOAT 457). Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.
Tugendhaft, Aaron. 2012. Unsettling Sovereignty: Politics and Poetics in the Baal Cycle. Journal of the American Oriental Society 132/3: 367-384.
Vidal, Jordi. 2014. Los orígenes de la ugaritología en Alemania y sus relaciones co el nazismo. In Rivista degli studio orientali, nuova serie Vol LXXXVII, fasc. 1-4: 245-260.
Virolleaud, Charle. 1946. Le Dieu de la Mer dans la Mythologie de Ras Shamra. Comptes Rendus des Seances de I' 'Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres: 499-509.
Watson, Wilfred and Wyatt, Nicolas. 1999. Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Leiden: Brill.
Wilkinson, Toby. 2011. The Rise and Fall of Ancient Egypt. London: Bloomsbury.
Wyatt, Nicolas. 2005. Epic in Ugaritic Literature. In A Companion to Ancient Epic. Ed. John Miles Foley. 246-254. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wyatt, Nicolas. 2007. The Religious Role of the King in Ugarit. Ugarit at Seventy-Five. Ed. K. Lawson Younger Jr. 41-74. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
Yon, Maguerite. 2006. The City of Ugarit at Tell Ras Shamra. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Töyräänvuori, J. (2022). The Ugaritic Combat Myth and Egypto-Hittite Relations in the Late Bronze Age. In: Kõiv, M., Läänemets, M., Droß-Krüpe, K., Fink, S. (eds) Crisis in Early Religion. Universal- und kulturhistorische Studien. Studies in Universal and Cultural History. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36989-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36989-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-36988-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-36989-7
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)
