Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Public Key Cryptography – PKC 2012
  3. Conference paper

Improved Security for Linearly Homomorphic Signatures: A Generic Framework

  • Conference paper
  • pp 697–714
  • Cite this conference paper
Save conference paper
View saved research
Public Key Cryptography – PKC 2012 (PKC 2012)
Improved Security for Linearly Homomorphic Signatures: A Generic Framework
  • David Mandell Freeman19 

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 7293))

Included in the following conference series:

  • International Workshop on Public Key Cryptography
  • 3319 Accesses

  • 106 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

Abstract

We propose a general framework that converts (ordinary) signature schemes having certain properties into linearly homomorphic signature schemes, i.e., schemes that allow authentication of linear functions on signed data. The security of the homomorphic scheme follows from the same computational assumption as is used to prove security of the underlying signature scheme. We show that the following signature schemes have the required properties and thus give rise to secure homomorphic signatures in the standard model:

  • The scheme of Waters (Eurocrypt 2005), secure under the computational Diffie-Hellman asumption in bilinear groups.

  • The scheme of Boneh and Boyen (Eurocrypt 2004, J. Cryptology 2008), secure under the q-strong Diffie-Hellman assumption in bilinear groups.

  • The scheme of Gennaro, Halevi, and Rabin (Eurocrypt 1999), secure under the strong RSA assumption.

  • The scheme of Hohenberger and Waters (Crypto 2009), secure under the RSA assumption.

Our systems not only allow weaker security assumptions than were previously available for homomorphic signatures in the standard model, but also are secure in a model that allows a stronger adversary than in other proposed schemes.

Our framework also leads to efficient linearly homomorphic signatures that are secure against our stronger adversary under weak assumptions (CDH or RSA) in the random oracle model; all previous proofs of security in the random oracle model break down completely when faced with our stronger adversary.

Download to read the full chapter text

Chapter PDF

Similar content being viewed by others

A Linearly Homomorphic Signature Scheme from Weaker Assumptions

Chapter © 2017

Provably Secure Homomorphic Signcryption

Chapter © 2017

On the Security Notions for Homomorphic Signatures

Chapter © 2018

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Computational Number Theory
  • Cryptology
  • Equity and Trust in Common Law
  • Linear Logic
  • Principles and Models of Security
  • Standards
  • Multivariate Cryptography and Algorithmic Approaches

References

  1. Ahlswede, R., Cai, N., Li, S., Yeung, R.: Network information flow. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 46(4), 1204–1216 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Attrapadung, N., Libert, B.: Homomorphic Network Coding Signatures in the Standard Model. In: Catalano, D., Fazio, N., Gennaro, R., Nicolosi, A. (eds.) PKC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6571, pp. 17–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Efficient Selective-ID Secure Identity-Based Encryption Without Random Oracles. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 223–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Short signatures without random oracles and the SDH assumption in bilinear groups. J. Cryptology 21, 149–177 (2008); extended abstract in Advances in Cryptology — EUROCRYPT 2004

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boneh, D., Freeman, D., Katz, J., Waters, B.: Signing a Linear Subspace: Signature Schemes for Network Coding. In: Jarecki, S., Tsudik, G. (eds.) PKC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5443, pp. 68–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Boneh, D., Freeman, D.M.: Homomorphic Signatures for Polynomial Functions. In: Paterson, K.G. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6632, pp. 149–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2011), full version available at http://eprint.iacr.org/2011/018

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Boneh, D., Freeman, D.M.: Linearly Homomorphic Signatures over Binary Fields and New Tools for Lattice-Based Signatures. In: Catalano, D., Fazio, N., Gennaro, R., Nicolosi, A. (eds.) PKC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6571, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2011), Full version available at http://eprint.iacr.org/2010/453

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Catalano, D., Fiore, D., Warinschi, B.: Adaptive Pseudo-free Groups and Applications. In: Paterson, K.G. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6632, pp. 207–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Catalano, D., Fiore, D., Warinschi, B.: Efficient Network Coding Signatures in the Standard Model. In: Fischlin, M., Buchmann, J., Manulis, M. (eds.) PKC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7293, pp. 680–696. Springer, Heidelberg (2012), http://eprint.iacr.org/2011/696

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charles, D., Jain, K., Lauter, K.: Signatures for network coding. International Journal of Information and Coding Theory 1(1), 3–14 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischlin, M.: The Cramer-Shoup Strong-RSA Signature Scheme Revisited. In: Desmedt, Y.G. (ed.) PKC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2567, pp. 116–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman, D.M.: Improved security for linearly homomorphic signatures: A generic framework. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2012/060 (2012), http://eprint.iacr.org/2012/060

  13. Gennaro, R., Halevi, S., Rabin, T.: Secure Hash-and-Sign Signatures without the Random Oracle. In: Stern, J. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592, pp. 123–139. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gennaro, R., Katz, J., Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Secure Network Coding over the Integers. In: Nguyen, P.Q., Pointcheval, D. (eds.) PKC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6056, pp. 142–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Gentry, C., Silverberg, A.: Hierarchical ID-Based Cryptography. In: Zheng, Y. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2501, pp. 548–566. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofheinz, D., Kiltz, E.: Programmable Hash Functions and Their Applications. In: Wagner, D. (ed.) CRYPTO 2008. LNCS, vol. 5157, pp. 21–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hohenberger, S., Waters, B.: Realizing Hash-and-Sign Signatures under Standard Assumptions. In: Joux, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5479, pp. 333–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Hohenberger, S., Waters, B.: Short and Stateless Signatures from the RSA Assumption. In: Halevi, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5677, pp. 654–670. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, R., Molnar, D., Song, D., Wagner, D.: Homomorphic Signature Schemes. In: Preneel, B. (ed.) CT-RSA 2002. LNCS, vol. 2271, pp. 244–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Chameleon signatures. In: Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Krohn, M., Freedman, M., Mazières, D.: On-the-fly verification of rateless erasure codes for efficient content distribution. In: Proc. of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 226–240 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lewko, A.B., Waters, B.: New Techniques for Dual System Encryption and Fully Secure HIBE with Short Ciphertexts. In: Micciancio, D. (ed.) TCC 2010. LNCS, vol. 5978, pp. 455–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Li, S.-Y.R., Yeung, R.W., Cai, N.: Linear network coding. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory 49(2), 371–381 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Waters, B.: Efficient Identity-Based Encryption Without Random Oracles. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 320–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford University, USA

    David Mandell Freeman

Authors
  1. David Mandell Freeman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Cryptography and Complexity Theory, Darmstadt University of Technology, Mornewegstr. 30, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany

    Marc Fischlin

  2. Department of Computer Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Hochschulstraße 10, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany

    Johannes Buchmann

  3. Department of Computing, University of Surrey, GU2 7XH, Guildford, Surrey, UK

    Mark Manulis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 International Association for Cryptologic Research

About this paper

Cite this paper

Freeman, D.M. (2012). Improved Security for Linearly Homomorphic Signatures: A Generic Framework. In: Fischlin, M., Buchmann, J., Manulis, M. (eds) Public Key Cryptography – PKC 2012. PKC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7293. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30057-8_41

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30057-8_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30056-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30057-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)Springer Nature Proceedings Computer Science

Share this paper

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Homomorphic signatures
  • standard model
  • bilinear groups
  • CDH
  • RSA

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

104.23.243.58

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature