Skip to main content

Choreography Conformance Analysis: Asynchronous Communications and Information Alignment

  • Conference paper
Web Services and Formal Methods (WS-FM 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4184))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 495 Accesses

  • 28 Citations

Abstract

Web service choreography languages provide a way to describe the collaboration protocol of multiple services that exchange information in order to achieve a common goal. This description may be seen as a specification that should be respected by the joint behavior of the set of services implementing the choreography. Such a conformance requires that (i) the observable behavior of the implementation corresponds to the behavior described by the protocol specification, and (ii) the business information is properly managed, guaranteeing that the participants have a shared knowledge about it, according to what is specified in the choreography. In this paper we present a choreography conformance analysis approach that addresses both the behavioral correspondence and the business information management. The key features of the approach are the capability to deal with asynchronous interactions and the ability to model and analyse the data managed and exchanged in the protocol, thus providing more accurate verification results. We also present symbolic techniques based on these formalizations that can be used for model checking of the choreography conformance.

This work is partially funded by the MIUR-FIRB project RBNE0195K5, “KLASE”, by the MIUR-PRIN 2004 project “STRAP”, and by the EU-IST project FP6-016004 “SENSORIA”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrews, T., Curbera, F., Dolakia, H., Goland, J., Klein, J., Leymann, F., Liu, K., Roller, D., Smith, D., Thatte, S., Trickovic, I., Weeravarana, S.: Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (version 1.1) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. OMG: Business Process Modeling Language (BPML) (2005), http://www.bpmi.org

  3. W3C (Web Services Choreography Description Language Version 1.0. W3C Candidate Recommendation, November 9, 2005), http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-cdl-10/

  4. Kazhamiakin, R., Pistore, M., Santuari, L.: Analysis of Communication Models in Web Service Compositions. In: Proc. WWW 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M.: Service-Oriented Design: A Multi-Viewpoint Approach. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 13(4), 337–368 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guerin, F., Pitt, J.: Verification and compliance testing. In: Communication in Multiagent Systems, pp. 98–112 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Busi, N., Gorrieri, R., Guidi, C., Lucchi, R., Zavattaro, G.: Choreography and orchestration: A synergic approach for system design. In: Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Traverso, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3826, pp. 228–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Graf, S., Saidi, H.: Construction of abstract state graph with PVS. In: Grumberg, O. (ed.) CAV 1997. LNCS, vol. 1254. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chaki, S., Clarke, E., Groce, A., Ouaknine, J., Strichman, O., Yorav, K.: Efficient verification of sequential and concurrent C programs. In: Proc. FMSD 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burch, J., Clarke, E., McMillan, K., Dill, D., Hwang, L.: Symbolic Model Checking: 1020 States and Beyond. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clarke, E., Emerson, E., Sistla, A.: Automatic Verification of Finite-state Concurrent Systems Using Temporal Logic Specifications. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 8(2) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Martelli, A., Patti, V., Schifanella, C.: Verifying the Conformance of Web Services to Global Interaction Protocols: a First Step. In: Proc. EPEW/WS-FM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Foster, H., Uchitel, S., Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Model-Based Analysis of Obligations in Web Service Choreography. In: Proc. AICT-ICIW 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van der Aalst, W.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C., Rozinat, A., Verbeek, H.: Choreography Conformance Checking: An Approach based on BPEL and Petri Nets. Technical report, BPM Center Report BPM-05-25 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brogi, A., Canal, C., Pimentel, E., Vallecillo, A.: Formalizing Web Services Choreographies. In: Proc. WS-FM 2004. ENTCS (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bravetti, M., Guidi, C., Lucchi, R., Zavattaro, G.: Supporting e-commerce systems formalization with choreography languages. In: Preneel, B., Tavares, S. (eds.) SAC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3897. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carbone, M., Honda, K., Yoshida, N.: A theoretical basis of communication-centred concurrent programming (2005), http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Nov/att-0015/part1_Nov25.pdf

  18. Fu, X., Bultan, T., Su, J.: Synchronizability of Conversations among Web Services. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(12), 1042–1055 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kazhamiakin, R., Pistore, M. (2006). Choreography Conformance Analysis: Asynchronous Communications and Information Alignment. In: Bravetti, M., Núñez, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds) Web Services and Formal Methods. WS-FM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4184. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11841197_15

Download citation

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Publish with us

Policies and ethics