Abstract
The Cactaceae contain many economically promising species primarily in the genus Opuntia. This genus appears to have its center of genetic diversity in Mexico where it is widely used as fodder, forage, fruit, and a green vegetable. In southwestern United States, the prickly-pears have been considered as both weeds and valuable forage plants. During the frequent, unpredictable droughts, propane torches known as “pear burners” are used to singe the spines off cactus pads so that they can be eaten by livestock. Although spineless varieties of Opuntia can be consumed directly by domestic livestock, they are extremely susceptible to herbivory by wildlife. The Cactaceae possess Crassulacean Acid Metabolism, which can be four- to five-fold more efficient in converting water to dry matter than the most efficient grasses. Some Opuntia strains grow rapidly with fresh-fruit yields of 8,000–12,000 kg/ha/ yr or more and dry-matter vegetative production of 20,000–50,000 kg/ha/yr.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Andres, L. A., and R. D. Goeden. 1971. The biological control of weeds by introduced natural enemies. Pages 143-164in C. B. Huffaker, ed., Biological control. AAAS symposium on biological control, Boston, MA, Dec 30–31, 1969.
Anonymous. 1981. El nopal. Publicación Especial 34. Comisión Nacional de Las Zonas Aridas y el Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico [D.F.].
Arnold, L. A., and D. L. Drawe. 1979. Seasonal food habits of white-tailed deer in the South Texas Plains. J. Range Managern. 32:175–178.
Benson, L. 1982. The cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA.
Brewbaker, J. L., and B. M. Hutton. 1979.Leucaena: versatile tropical tree legume. Pages 207–259in G. A. Ritchie, ed., New agricultural crops. Amer. Assoc. Advancem. Sci. Symp. Vol. 38. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Crosswhite, F. S. 1980. The annual saguaro harvest and crop cycle of the Papago with reference to ecology and symbolism. Desert Pl. 2(1):2–61.
Díaz del Castillo, B. 1956. The discovery and conquest of Mexico. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
Domingues, O. 1963. Origem e introdução da palma forrageira no Nordeste. Instituto Joaquim Nabuco de Pesquisas Sociais, Recife, Pernambuco.
Evans, E. H.1967. They color things red. Pacific Disc. 20:24–25.
Everitt, J. H., and C. L. Gonzalez. 1981. Seasonal nutrient content in food plants of white-tailed deer on the South Texas Plains. J. Range Managern. 34:506;-510.
Felger, R. S. 1979. Ancient crops for the twenty-first century. Pages 5–20in G. A. Ritchie, ed., New agricultural crops. Amer. Assoc. Advancem. Sci. Symp. Vol. 38. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Felker, P., and P. R. Clark. 1982. Position of mesquite (Prosopis spp.) nodulation and nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) in 3-m long phraeatophytically simulated soil columns. Pl. & Soil 64:297–305.
Fisher, R. A., and N. C. Turner. 1978. Plant productivity in the arid and semi-arid zones. Annual Rev. Pl. Physiol. 29:277–317.
Glumac, E. L. 1985. Biomass production, survival and cold tolerance of three species ofLeucaena in South Texas. M.S. thesis, Texas A&I University, Kingsville, TX.
Griffiths, D. 1905. The prickly pear and other cacti as food for stock. U.S.D.A. Bur. PL Industr. Bull. 74.
-.Griffiths, D. 1906. Feeding prickly pear to stock. U.S.D.A. Bur. Pl. Industr. Bull. 91.
-. 1908. The prickly pear as a farm crop. U.S.D.A. Bur. Pl. Industr. Bull. 124.
-. 1915. Yields of native prickly pear in southern Texas. U.S.D.A. Bur. Pl. Industr. Bull. 208.
-, and R. F. Hare. 1907. The tuna as food for man. U.S.D.A. Bur. Pl. Industr. Bull. 116.
Hernández X., E. 1970. The Mexican experience. Pages 336–339in H. Dregne, ed., Arid lands in transition. Amer. Assoc. Advance. Sci. Publ. 90. Washington, DC.
Kluge, M., and I. P. Ting. 1978. Crassulacean Acid Metabolism: an ecological analysis. Ecological Studies Series, Vol. 30. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Lehmann, V. W. 1984. Bobwhites of the Rio Grande Plain of Texas. Texas A&M Univ. Press, College Station, TX.
-. n.d. Prickly pear, a plant of many possibilities. Unpubl. ms. King Ranch, Kingsville, TX.
Monjauze, A., and H. N. Le Houérou. 1965. Le rôle desOpuntia dans l’économie agricole nord africaine. Bull. École Natl. Supér. Agric. Tunis 8–9:85–164.
Moss, E. H. 1983. Flora of Alberta. 2nd ed.; revised by J. G. Packer. Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto.
Norwine, J. 1981. Precipitation trends and variability in the vicinity of northwest gulf coast: 1900–1980. Pages 322–333in R. D. Cross and D. L. Williams, ed., Proceedings of the national symposium on freshwater inflow to estuaries, Vol. II. Office of Biological Services, Fish &Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-81/04, Washington, DC.
Ramsey, C. W. 1965. Potential economic returns from deer as compared with livestock in the Edwards Plateau region of Texas. J. Range Managern. 18:247–250.
Russell, C. E. 1986. Cactus, ecology and range management during drought. Pages 59–69in R. D. Brown, ed., Proceedings of a symposium on livestock and wildlife management during drought. Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&I Univ., Kingsville, TX.
Teer, J. C. 1975. Commercial uses of game animals on rangelands of Texas. J. Anim. Sci. 40:1000–1008.
Toroni C, F., and X. Zúñiga O. 1983. Aspectos tecnologicos y socioeconomicos de la produccion de tunas en las comúnas de Til-Til y Pudahuel, Region Metropolitana. Tesis para optar al grado de Licenciado en Ciencias Agrícolas (Especialidad: Fruiticultura). Univ. de Chile, Santiago.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russell, C.E., Felker, P. The prickly-pears (Opuntia spp., Cactaceae): A source of human and animal food in semiarid regions. Econ Bot 41, 433–445 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859062
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859062