Skip to main content
Log in

The prickly-pears (Opuntia spp., Cactaceae): A source of human and animal food in semiarid regions

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cactaceae contain many economically promising species primarily in the genus Opuntia. This genus appears to have its center of genetic diversity in Mexico where it is widely used as fodder, forage, fruit, and a green vegetable. In southwestern United States, the prickly-pears have been considered as both weeds and valuable forage plants. During the frequent, unpredictable droughts, propane torches known as “pear burners” are used to singe the spines off cactus pads so that they can be eaten by livestock. Although spineless varieties of Opuntia can be consumed directly by domestic livestock, they are extremely susceptible to herbivory by wildlife. The Cactaceae possess Crassulacean Acid Metabolism, which can be four- to five-fold more efficient in converting water to dry matter than the most efficient grasses. Some Opuntia strains grow rapidly with fresh-fruit yields of 8,000–12,000 kg/ha/ yr or more and dry-matter vegetative production of 20,000–50,000 kg/ha/yr.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Andres, L. A., and R. D. Goeden. 1971. The biological control of weeds by introduced natural enemies. Pages 143-164in C. B. Huffaker, ed., Biological control. AAAS symposium on biological control, Boston, MA, Dec 30–31, 1969.

  • Anonymous. 1981. El nopal. Publicación Especial 34. Comisión Nacional de Las Zonas Aridas y el Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico [D.F.].

  • Arnold, L. A., and D. L. Drawe. 1979. Seasonal food habits of white-tailed deer in the South Texas Plains. J. Range Managern. 32:175–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, L. 1982. The cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J. L., and B. M. Hutton. 1979.Leucaena: versatile tropical tree legume. Pages 207–259in G. A. Ritchie, ed., New agricultural crops. Amer. Assoc. Advancem. Sci. Symp. Vol. 38. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosswhite, F. S. 1980. The annual saguaro harvest and crop cycle of the Papago with reference to ecology and symbolism. Desert Pl. 2(1):2–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz del Castillo, B. 1956. The discovery and conquest of Mexico. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingues, O. 1963. Origem e introdução da palma forrageira no Nordeste. Instituto Joaquim Nabuco de Pesquisas Sociais, Recife, Pernambuco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. H.1967. They color things red. Pacific Disc. 20:24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, J. H., and C. L. Gonzalez. 1981. Seasonal nutrient content in food plants of white-tailed deer on the South Texas Plains. J. Range Managern. 34:506;-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felger, R. S. 1979. Ancient crops for the twenty-first century. Pages 5–20in G. A. Ritchie, ed., New agricultural crops. Amer. Assoc. Advancem. Sci. Symp. Vol. 38. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felker, P., and P. R. Clark. 1982. Position of mesquite (Prosopis spp.) nodulation and nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) in 3-m long phraeatophytically simulated soil columns. Pl. & Soil 64:297–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A., and N. C. Turner. 1978. Plant productivity in the arid and semi-arid zones. Annual Rev. Pl. Physiol. 29:277–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glumac, E. L. 1985. Biomass production, survival and cold tolerance of three species ofLeucaena in South Texas. M.S. thesis, Texas A&I University, Kingsville, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, D. 1905. The prickly pear and other cacti as food for stock. U.S.D.A. Bur. PL Industr. Bull. 74.

  • -.Griffiths, D. 1906. Feeding prickly pear to stock. U.S.D.A. Bur. Pl. Industr. Bull. 91.

  • -. 1908. The prickly pear as a farm crop. U.S.D.A. Bur. Pl. Industr. Bull. 124.

  • -. 1915. Yields of native prickly pear in southern Texas. U.S.D.A. Bur. Pl. Industr. Bull. 208.

  • -, and R. F. Hare. 1907. The tuna as food for man. U.S.D.A. Bur. Pl. Industr. Bull. 116.

  • Hernández X., E. 1970. The Mexican experience. Pages 336–339in H. Dregne, ed., Arid lands in transition. Amer. Assoc. Advance. Sci. Publ. 90. Washington, DC.

  • Kluge, M., and I. P. Ting. 1978. Crassulacean Acid Metabolism: an ecological analysis. Ecological Studies Series, Vol. 30. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, V. W. 1984. Bobwhites of the Rio Grande Plain of Texas. Texas A&M Univ. Press, College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. n.d. Prickly pear, a plant of many possibilities. Unpubl. ms. King Ranch, Kingsville, TX.

  • Monjauze, A., and H. N. Le Houérou. 1965. Le rôle desOpuntia dans l’économie agricole nord africaine. Bull. École Natl. Supér. Agric. Tunis 8–9:85–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, E. H. 1983. Flora of Alberta. 2nd ed.; revised by J. G. Packer. Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwine, J. 1981. Precipitation trends and variability in the vicinity of northwest gulf coast: 1900–1980. Pages 322–333in R. D. Cross and D. L. Williams, ed., Proceedings of the national symposium on freshwater inflow to estuaries, Vol. II. Office of Biological Services, Fish &Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-81/04, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, C. W. 1965. Potential economic returns from deer as compared with livestock in the Edwards Plateau region of Texas. J. Range Managern. 18:247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. E. 1986. Cactus, ecology and range management during drought. Pages 59–69in R. D. Brown, ed., Proceedings of a symposium on livestock and wildlife management during drought. Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&I Univ., Kingsville, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teer, J. C. 1975. Commercial uses of game animals on rangelands of Texas. J. Anim. Sci. 40:1000–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toroni C, F., and X. Zúñiga O. 1983. Aspectos tecnologicos y socioeconomicos de la produccion de tunas en las comúnas de Til-Til y Pudahuel, Region Metropolitana. Tesis para optar al grado de Licenciado en Ciencias Agrícolas (Especialidad: Fruiticultura). Univ. de Chile, Santiago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, C.E., Felker, P. The prickly-pears (Opuntia spp., Cactaceae): A source of human and animal food in semiarid regions. Econ Bot 41, 433–445 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859062

Keywords