Java Generated Code Guide
Any differences between proto2, proto3, and Editions generated code are highlighted—note that these differences are in the generated code as described in this document, not the base message classes/interfaces, which are the same in all versions. You should read the proto2 language guide, proto3 language guide, and/or Editions language guide before reading this document.
Note that no Java protocol buffer methods accept or return nulls unless otherwise specified.
Compiler Invocation
The protocol buffer compiler produces Java output when invoked with the
--java_out= command-line flag. The parameter to the --java_out= option is
the directory where you want the compiler to write your Java output. For each
.proto file input, the compiler creates a wrapper .java file containing a
Java class that represents the .proto file itself.
If the .proto file contains a line like the following:
option java_multiple_files = true;
Then the compiler will also create separate .java files for each of the
classes/enums which it will generate for each top-level message, enumeration,
and service declared in the .proto file.
Otherwise (when the java_multiple_files option is disabled, which is the
default), the aforementioned wrapper class will also be used as an outer class,
and the generated classes/enums for each top-level message, enumeration, and
service declared in the .proto file will all be nested within the outer
wrapper class. Thus the compiler will only generate a single .java file for
the entire .proto file, and it will have an extra layer in the package
The wrapper class’s name is chosen as follows: If the .proto file contains a
line like the following:
option java_outer_classname = "Foo";
Then the wrapper class name will be Foo. Otherwise, the wrapper class name is
determined by converting the .proto file base name to camel case. For example,
foo_bar.proto will generate a class name of FooBar. If there’s a service,
enum, or message (including nested types) in the file with the same name,
“OuterClass” will be appended to the wrapper class’s name. Examples:
- If
foo_bar.protocontains a message calledFooBar, the wrapper class will generate a class name ofFooBarOuterClass. - If
foo_bar.protocontains a service calledFooService, andjava_outer_classnameis also set to the stringFooService, then the wrapper class will generate a class name ofFooServiceOuterClass.
Note
If you are using the deprecated v1 of the protobuf API,OuterClass is added regardless of
any collisions with message
names.In addition to any nested classes, the wrapper class itself will have the
following API (assuming the wrapper class is named Foo and was generated from
foo.proto):
public final class Foo {
private Foo() {} // Not instantiable.
/** Returns a FileDescriptor message describing the contents of {@code foo.proto}. */
public static com.google.protobuf.Descriptors.FileDescriptor getDescriptor();
/** Adds all extensions defined in {@code foo.proto} to the given registry. */
public static void registerAllExtensions(com.google.protobuf.ExtensionRegistry registry);
public static void registerAllExtensions(com.google.protobuf.ExtensionRegistryLite registry);
// (Nested classes omitted)
}
The Java package name is chosen as described under Packages, below.
The output file is chosen by concatenating the parameter to --java_out=, the
package name (with .s replaced with /s), and the .java file name.
So, for example, let’s say you invoke the compiler as follows:
protoc --proto_path=src --java_out=build/gen src/foo.proto
If foo.proto’s Java package is com.example and it doesn’t enable
java_multiple_files and its outer classname is FooProtos, then the protocol
buffer compiler will generate the file build/gen/com/example/FooProtos.java.
The protocol buffer compiler will automatically create the build/gen/com and
build/gen/com/example directories if needed. However, it will not create
build/gen or build; they must already exist. You can specify multiple
.proto files in a single invocation; all output files will be generated at
once.
When outputting Java code, the protocol buffer compiler’s ability to output
directly to JAR archives is particularly convenient, as many Java tools are able
to read source code directly from JAR files. To output to a JAR file, simply
provide an output location ending in .jar. Note that only the Java source code
is placed in the archive; you must still compile it separately to produce Java
class files.
Packages
The generated class is placed in a Java package based on the java_package
option. If the option is omitted, the package declaration is used instead.
For example, if the .proto file contains:
package foo.bar;
Then the resulting Java class will be placed in Java package
foo.bar. However, if the .proto file also
contains a java_package option, like so:
package foo.bar;
option java_package = "com.example.foo.bar";
Then the class is placed in the com.example.foo.bar package instead. The
java_package option is provided because normal .proto package declarations
are not expected to start with a backwards domain name.
Messages
If you are designing a new protocol buffer schema, see the recommendations for Java proto names.
Given a simple message declaration:
message Foo {}
The protocol buffer compiler generates a class called Foo, which implements
the Message interface. The class is declared final; no further subclassing
is allowed. Foo extends GeneratedMessage, but this should be considered an
implementation detail. By default, Foo overrides many methods of
GeneratedMessage with specialized versions for maximum speed. However, if the
.proto file contains the line:
option optimize_for = CODE_SIZE;
then Foo will override only the minimum set of methods necessary to function
and rely on GeneratedMessage’s reflection-based implementations of the rest.
This significantly reduces the size of the generated code, but also reduces
performance. Alternatively, if the .proto file contains:
option optimize_for = LITE_RUNTIME;
then Foo will include fast implementations of all methods, but will implement
the MessageLite interface, which contains a subset of the methods of
Message. In particular, it does not support descriptors, nested builders, or
reflection. However, in this mode, the generated code only needs to link against
libprotobuf-lite.jar instead of libprotobuf.jar. The “lite” library is much
smaller than the full library, and is more appropriate for resource-constrained
systems such as mobile phones.
The Message interface defines methods that let you check, manipulate, read, or
write the entire message. In addition to these methods, the Foo class defines
the following static methods:
static Foo getDefaultInstance(): Returns the singleton instance ofFoo. This instance’s contents are identical to what you’d get if you calledFoo.newBuilder().build()(so all singular fields are unset and all repeated fields are empty). Note that the default instance of a message can be used as a factory by calling itsnewBuilderForType()method.static Descriptor getDescriptor(): Returns the type’s descriptor. This contains information about the type, including what fields it has and what their types are. This can be used with the reflection methods of theMessage, such asgetField().static Foo parseFrom(...): Parses a message of typeFoofrom the given source and returns it. There is oneparseFrommethod corresponding to each variant ofmergeFrom()in theMessage.Builderinterface. Note thatparseFrom()never throwsUninitializedMessageException; it throwsInvalidProtocolBufferExceptionif the parsed message is missing required fields. This makes it subtly different from callingFoo.newBuilder().mergeFrom(...).build().static Parser parser(): Returns an instance of theParser, which implements variousparseFrom()methods.Foo.Builder newBuilder(): Creates a new builder (described below).Foo.Builder newBuilder(Foo prototype): Creates a new builder with all fields initialized to the same values that they have inprototype. Since embedded message and string objects are immutable, they are shared between the original and the copy.
Builders
Message objects—such as instances of the Foo class described
above—are immutable, just like a Java String. To construct a message
object, you need to use a builder. Each message class has its own builder
class—so in our Foo example, the protocol buffer compiler generates a
nested class Foo.Builder which can be used to build a Foo. Foo.Builder
implements the Message.Builder interface. It extends the
GeneratedMessage.Builder class, but, again, this should be considered an
implementation detail. Like Foo, Foo.Builder may rely on generic method
implementations in GeneratedMessage.Builder or, when the optimize_for option
is used, generated custom code that is much faster. You can get a Foo.Builder
by calling the static method Foo.newBuilder().
Foo.Builder does not define any static methods. Its interface is exactly as
defined by the Message.Builder interface, with the exception that return types
are more specific: methods of Foo.Builder that modify the builder return type
Foo.Builder, and build() returns type Foo.
Methods that modify the contents of a builder—including field
setters—always return a reference to the builder (i.e. they “return this;”). This allows multiple method calls to be chained together in one line.
For example: builder.mergeFrom(obj).setFoo(1).setBar("abc").clearBaz();
Note that builders are not thread-safe, so Java synchronization should be used whenever it is necessary for multiple different threads to be modifying the contents of a single builder.
Sub-Builders
For messages containing sub-messages, the compiler also generates sub-builders. This allows you to repeatedly modify deep-nested sub-messages without rebuilding them. For example:
message Foo {
int32 val = 1;
// some other fields.
}
message Bar {
Foo foo = 1;
// some other fields.
}
message Baz {
Bar bar = 1;
// some other fields.
}
If you have a Baz message already, and want to change the deeply nested val
in Foo. Instead of:
baz = baz.toBuilder().setBar(
baz.getBar().toBuilder().setFoo(
baz.getBar().getFoo().toBuilder().setVal(10).build()
).build()).build();
You can write:
Baz.Builder builder = baz.toBuilder();
builder.getBarBuilder().getFooBuilder().setVal(10);
baz = builder.build();
Nested Types
A message can be declared inside another message. For example:
message Foo {
message Bar { }
}
In this case, the compiler simply generates Bar as an inner class nested
inside Foo.
Fields
In addition to the methods described in the previous section, the protocol
buffer compiler generates a set of accessor methods for each field defined
within the message in the .proto file. The methods that read the field value
are defined both in the message class and its corresponding builder; the methods
that modify the value are defined in the builder only.
Note that method names always use camel-case naming, even if the field name in
the .proto file uses lower-case with underscores
(as it should). The
case-conversion works as follows:
- For each underscore in the name, the underscore is removed, and the following letter is capitalized.
- If the name will have a prefix attached (e.g. “get”), the first letter is capitalized. Otherwise, it is lower-cased.
- The letter following the last digit in each number in a method name is capitalized.
Thus, the field foo_bar_baz becomes fooBarBaz. If prefixed with get, it
would be getFooBarBaz. And foo_ba23r_baz becomes fooBa23RBaz.
As well as accessor methods, the compiler generates an integer constant for each
field containing its field number. The constant name is the field name converted
to upper-case followed by _FIELD_NUMBER. For example, given the field int32 foo_bar = 5;, the compiler will generate the constant public static final int FOO_BAR_FIELD_NUMBER = 5;.
The following sections are divided between explicit and implicit presence.
Proto2 has explicit presence and proto3 defaults to implicit presence. Editions
defaults to explicit presence, but you can override that using
features.field_presence.
Singular Fields with Explicit Presence
For any of these field definitions:
optional int32 foo = 1;
required int32 foo = 1;
The compiler will generate the following accessor methods in both the message class and its builder:
boolean hasFoo(): Returnstrueif the field is set.int getFoo(): Returns the current value of the field. If the field is not set, returns the default value.
The compiler will generate the following methods only in the message’s builder:
Builder setFoo(int value): Sets the value of the field. After calling this,hasFoo()will returntrueandgetFoo()will returnvalue.Builder clearFoo(): Clears the value of the field. After calling this,hasFoo()will returnfalseandgetFoo()will return the default value.
For other simple field types, the corresponding Java type is chosen according to the scalar value types table. For message and enum types, the value type is replaced with the message or enum class.
Embedded Message Fields
For message types, setFoo() also accepts an instance of the message’s builder
type as the parameter. This is just a shortcut which is equivalent to calling
.build() on the builder and passing the result to the method. Further
modifying the sub-builder passed to setFoo will not be reflected in the
message class’s builder. The message class’s builder “takes ownership” of the
sub-message.
If the field is not set, getFoo() will return a Foo instance with none of its
fields set (possibly the instance returned by Foo.getDefaultInstance()).
In addition, the compiler generates two accessor methods that allow you to access the relevant sub-builders for message types. The following method is generated in both the message class and its builder:
FooOrBuilder getFooOrBuilder(): Returns the builder for the field, if it already exists, or the message if not. Calling this method on builders will not create a sub-builder for the field.
The compiler generates the following method only in the message’s builder.
Builder getFooBuilder(): Returns the builder for the field.
Singular Fields with Implicit Presence
For this field definition:
int32 foo = 1;
The compiler will generate the following accessor method in both the message class and its builder:
int getFoo(): Returns the current value of the field. If the field is not set, returns the default value for the field’s type.
The compiler will generate the following methods only in the message’s builder:
Builder setFoo(int value): Sets the value of the field. After calling this,getFoo()will returnvalue.Builder clearFoo(): Clears the value of the field. After calling this,getFoo()will return the default value for the field’s type.
For other simple field types, the corresponding Java type is chosen according to the scalar value types table. For message and enum types, the value type is replaced with the message or enum class.
Enum Fields
For enum field types, an additional accessor method is generated in both the message class and its builder:
int getFooValue(): Returns the integer value of the enum.
The compiler will generate the following additional method only in the message’s builder:
Builder setFooValue(int value): Sets the integer value of the enum.
In addition, getFoo() will return UNRECOGNIZED if the enum value is
unknown—this is a special additional value added by the proto3 compiler to
the generated enum type.
Repeated Fields
For this field definition:
repeated string foos = 1;
The compiler will generate the following accessor methods in both the message class and its builder:
int getFoosCount(): Returns the number of elements currently in the field.String getFoos(int index): Returns the element at the given zero-based index.ProtocolStringList getFoosList(): Returns the entire field as aProtocolStringList. If the field is not set, returns an empty list.
The compiler will generate the following methods only in the message’s builder:
Builder setFoos(int index, String value): Sets the value of the element at the given zero-based index.Builder addFoos(String value): Appends a new element to the field with the given value.Builder addAllFoos(Iterable<? extends String> value): Appends all elements in the givenIterableto the field.Builder clearFoos(): Removes all elements from the field. After calling this,getFoosCount()will return zero.
For other simple field types, the corresponding Java type is chosen according to the scalar value types table. For message and enum types, the type is the message or enum class.
Repeated Embedded Message Fields
For message types, setFoos() and addFoos() also accept an instance of the
message’s builder type as the parameter. This is just a shortcut which is
equivalent to calling .build() on the builder and passing the result to the
method. There is also an additional generated method:
Builder addFoos(int index, Field value): Inserts a new element at the given zero-based index. Shifts the element currently at that position (if any) and any subsequent elements to the right (adds one to their indices).
In addition, the compiler generates the following additional accessor methods in both the message class and its builder for message types, allowing you to access the relevant sub-builders:
FooOrBuilder getFoosOrBuilder(int index): Returns the builder for the specified element, if it already exists, or throwsIndexOutOfBoundsExceptionif not. If this is called from a message class, it will always return a message (or throw an exception) rather than a builder. Calling this method on builders will not create a sub-builder for the field.List<FooOrBuilder> getFoosOrBuilderList(): Returns the entire field as an unmodifiable list of builders (if available) or messages if not. If this is called from a message class, it will always return an immutable list of messages rather than an unmodifiable list of builders.
The compiler will generate the following methods only in the message’s builder:
Builder getFoosBuilder(int index): Returns the builder for the element at the specified index, or throwsIndexOutOfBoundsExceptionif the index is out of bounds.Builder addFoosBuilder(int index): Inserts and returns a builder for a default message instance of the repeated message at the specified index. The existing entries are shifted to higher indices to make room for the inserted builder.Builder addFoosBuilder(): Appends and returns a builder for a default message instance of the repeated message.Builder removeFoos(int index): Removes the element at the given zero-based index.List<Builder> getFoosBuilderList(): Returns the entire field as an unmodifiable list of builders.
Repeated Enum Fields (proto3 only)
The compiler will generate the following additional methods in both the message class and its builder:
int getFoosValue(int index): Returns the integer value of the enum at the specified index.List<java.lang.Integer> getFoosValueList(): Returns the entire field as a list of Integers.
The compiler will generate the following additional method only in the message’s builder:
Builder setFoosValue(int index, int value): Sets the integer value of the enum at the specified index.
Name Conflicts
If another non-repeated field has a name that conflicts with one of the repeated field’s generated methods, then both field names will have their protobuf field number appended to the end.
For these field definitions:
int32 foos_count = 1;
repeated string foos = 2;
The compiler will first rename them to the following:
int32 foos_count_1 = 1;
repeated string foos_2 = 2;
The accessor methods will subsequently be generated as described above.
Oneof Fields
For this oneof field definition:
oneof choice {
int32 foo_int = 4;
string foo_string = 9;
...
}
All the fields in the choice oneof will use a single private field for their
value. In addition, the protocol buffer compiler will generate a Java enum type
for the oneof case, as follows:
public enum ChoiceCase
implements com.google.protobuf.Internal.EnumLite {
FOO_INT(4),
FOO_STRING(9),
...
CHOICE_NOT_SET(0);
...
};
The values of this enum type have the following special methods:
int getNumber(): Returns the object’s numeric value as defined in the .proto file.static ChoiceCase forNumber(int value): Returns the enum object corresponding to the given numeric value (ornullfor other numeric values).
The compiler will generate the following accessor methods in both the message class and its builder:
boolean hasFooInt(): Returnstrueif the oneof case isFOO_INT.int getFooInt(): Returns the current value offooif the oneof case isFOO_INT. Otherwise, returns the default value of this field.ChoiceCase getChoiceCase(): Returns the enum indicating which field is set. ReturnsCHOICE_NOT_SETif none of them is set.
The compiler will generate the following methods only in the message’s builder:
Builder setFooInt(int value): SetsFooto this value and sets the oneof case toFOO_INT. After calling this,hasFooInt()will returntrue,getFooInt()will returnvalueandgetChoiceCase()will returnFOO_INT.Builder clearFooInt():- Nothing will be changed if the oneof case is not
FOO_INT. - If the oneof case is
FOO_INT, setsFooto null and the oneof case toCHOICE_NOT_SET. After calling this,hasFooInt()will returnfalse,getFooInt()will return the default value andgetChoiceCase()will returnCHOICE_NOT_SET.
- Nothing will be changed if the oneof case is not
Builder.clearChoice(): Resets the value forchoice, returning the builder.
For other simple field types, the corresponding Java type is chosen according to the scalar value types table. For message and enum types, the value type is replaced with the message or enum class.
Map Fields
For this map field definition:
map<int32, int32> weight = 1;
The compiler will generate the following accessor methods in both the message class and its builder:
Map<Integer, Integer> getWeightMap();: Returns an unmodifiableMap.int getWeightOrDefault(int key, int default);: Returns the value for key or the default value if not present.int getWeightOrThrow(int key);: Returns the value for key or throws IllegalArgumentException if not present.boolean containsWeight(int key);: Indicates if the key is present in this field.int getWeightCount();: Returns the number of elements in the map.
The compiler will generate the following methods only in the message’s builder:
Builder putWeight(int key, int value);: Add the weight to this field.Builder putAllWeight(Map<Integer, Integer> value);: Adds all entries in the given map to this field.Builder removeWeight(int key);: Removes the weight from this field.Builder clearWeight();: Removes all weights from this field.@Deprecated Map<Integer, Integer> getMutableWeight();: Returns a mutableMap. Note that multiple calls to this method may return different map instances. The returned map reference may be invalidated by any subsequent method calls to the Builder.
Message Value Map Fields
For maps with message types as values, the compiler will generate an additional method in the message’s builder:
Foo.Builder putFooBuilderIfAbsent(int key);: Ensures thatkeyis present in the mapping, and inserts a newFoo.Builderif one does not already exist. Changes to the returnedFoo.Builderwill be reflected in the final message.
Any
Given an Any field
like this:
import "google/protobuf/any.proto";
message ErrorStatus {
string message = 1;
google.protobuf.Any details = 2;
}
In our generated code, the getter for the details field returns an instance of
com.google.protobuf.Any. This provides the following special methods to pack
and unpack the Any’s values:
class Any {
// Packs the given message into an Any using the default type URL
// prefix “type.googleapis.com”.
public static Any pack(Message message);
// Packs the given message into an Any using the given type URL
// prefix.
public static Any pack(Message message,
String typeUrlPrefix);
// Checks whether this Any message’s payload is the given type.
public <T extends Message> boolean is(class<T> clazz);
// Checks whether this Any message’s payload has the same type as the given
// message.
public boolean isSameTypeAs(Message message);
// Unpacks Any into a message with the same type as the given messsage.
// Throws exception if the type doesn’t match or parsing the payload fails.
public <T extends Message> T unpackSameTypeAs(T message)
throws InvalidProtocolBufferException;
// Unpacks Any into the given message type. Throws exception if
// the type doesn’t match or parsing the payload has failed.
public <T extends Message> T unpack(class<T> clazz)
throws InvalidProtocolBufferException;
}
Enumerations
Given an enum definition like:
enum Foo {
VALUE_A = 0;
VALUE_B = 5;
VALUE_C = 1234;
}
The protocol buffer compiler will generate a Java enum type called Foo with
the same set of values. If you are using proto3, it also adds the special value
UNRECOGNIZED to the enum type. In Editions, OPEN enums also have a
UNRECOGNIZED value, while CLOSED enums do not. The values of the generated
enum type have the following special methods:
int getNumber(): Returns the object’s numeric value as defined in the.protofile.EnumValueDescriptor getValueDescriptor(): Returns the value’s descriptor, which contains information about the value’s name, number, and type.EnumDescriptor getDescriptorForType(): Returns the enum type’s descriptor, which contains e.g. information about each defined value.
Additionally, the Foo enum type contains the following static methods:
static Foo forNumber(int value): Returns the enum object corresponding to the given numeric value. Returns null when there is no corresponding enum object.static Foo valueOf(int value): Returns the enum object corresponding to the given numeric value. This method is deprecated in favor offorNumber(int value)and will be removed in an upcoming release.static Foo valueOf(EnumValueDescriptor descriptor): Returns the enum object corresponding to the given value descriptor. May be faster thanvalueOf(int). In proto3 andOPENenums, returnsUNRECOGNIZEDif passed an unknown value descriptor.EnumDescriptor getDescriptor(): Returns the enum type’s descriptor, which contains e.g. information about each defined value. (This differs fromgetDescriptorForType()only in that it is a static method.)
An integer constant is also generated with the suffix _VALUE for each enum value.
Note that the .proto language allows multiple enum symbols to have the same
numeric value. Symbols with the same numeric value are synonyms. For example:
enum Foo {
BAR = 0;
BAZ = 0;
}
In this case, BAZ is a synonym for BAR. In Java, BAZ will be defined as a
static final field like so:
static final Foo BAZ = BAR;
Thus, BAR and BAZ compare equal, and BAZ should never appear in switch
statements. The compiler always chooses the first symbol defined with a given
numeric value to be the “canonical” version of that symbol; all subsequent
symbols with the same number are just aliases.
An enum can be defined nested within a message type. The compiler generates the Java enum definition nested within that message type’s class.
Caution: when generating Java code, the maximum number of values in a protobuf
enum may be surprisingly low—in the worst case, the maximum is slightly
over 1,700 values. This limit is due to per-method size limits for Java
bytecode, and it varies across Java implementations, different versions of the
protobuf suite, and any options set on the enum in the .proto file.
Extensions
Given a message with an extension range:
edition = "2023";
message Foo {
extensions 100 to 199;
}
The protocol buffer compiler will make Foo extend
GeneratedMessage.ExtendableMessage instead of the usual GeneratedMessage.
Similarly, Foo’s builder will extend GeneratedMessage.ExtendableBuilder. You
should never refer to these base types by name (GeneratedMessage is considered
an implementation detail). However, these superclasses define a number of
additional methods that you can use to manipulate extensions.
In particular Foo and Foo.Builder will inherit the methods hasExtension(),
getExtension(), and getExtensionCount(). Additionally, Foo.Builder will
inherit methods setExtension() and clearExtension(). Each of these methods
takes, as its first parameter, an extension identifier (described below), which
identifies an extension field. The remaining parameters and the return value are
exactly the same as those for the corresponding accessor methods that would be
generated for a normal (non-extension) field of the same type as the extension
identifier.
Given an extension definition:
edition = "2023";
import "foo.proto";
extend Foo {
int32 bar = 123;
}
The protocol buffer compiler generates an “extension identifier” called bar,
which you can use with Foo’s extension accessors to access this extension,
like so:
Foo foo =
Foo.newBuilder()
.setExtension(bar, 1)
.build();
assert foo.hasExtension(bar);
assert foo.getExtension(bar) == 1;
(The exact implementation of extension identifiers is complicated and involves magical use of generics—however, you don’t need to worry about how extension identifiers work to use them.)
Note that bar would be declared as a static field of the wrapper class for the
.proto file, as described above; we have omitted the wrapper class name in the
example.
Extensions can be declared inside the scope of another type to prefix their generated symbol names. For example, a common pattern is to extend a message by a field inside the declaration of the field’s type:
edition = "2023";
import "foo.proto";
message Baz {
extend Foo {
Baz foo_ext = 124;
}
}
In this case, an extension with identifier foo_ext and type Baz is declared
inside the declaration of Baz, and referring to foo_ext requires the
addition of a Baz. prefix:
Baz baz = createMyBaz();
Foo foo =
Foo.newBuilder()
.setExtension(Baz.fooExt, baz)
.build();
assert foo.hasExtension(Baz.fooExt);
assert foo.getExtension(Baz.fooExt) == baz;
When parsing a message that might have extensions, you must provide an
ExtensionRegistry
in which you have registered any extensions that you want to be able to parse.
Otherwise, those extensions will be treated like unknown fields and the methods
observing extensions will behave as if they don’t exist.
ExtensionRegistry registry = ExtensionRegistry.newInstance();
registry.add(Baz.fooExt);
Foo foo = Foo.parseFrom(input, registry);
assert foo.hasExtension(Baz.fooExt);
ExtensionRegistry registry = ExtensionRegistry.newInstance();
Foo foo = Foo.parseFrom(input, registry);
assert foo.hasExtension(Baz.fooExt) == false;
Services
If the .proto file contains the following line:
option java_generic_services = true;
Then the protocol buffer compiler will generate code based on the service definitions found in the file as described in this section. However, the generated code may be undesirable as it is not tied to any particular RPC system, and thus requires more levels of indirection than code tailored to one system. If you do NOT want this code to be generated, add this line to the file:
option java_generic_services = false;
If neither of the above lines are given, the option defaults to false, as
generic services are deprecated. (Note that prior to 2.4.0, the option defaults
to true)
RPC systems based on .proto-language service definitions should provide
plugins
to generate code appropriate for the system. These plugins are likely to require
that abstract services are disabled, so that they can generate their own classes
of the same names.
The remainder of this section describes what the protocol buffer compiler generates when abstract services are enabled.
Interface
Given a service definition:
service Foo {
rpc Bar(FooRequest) returns(FooResponse);
}
The protocol buffer compiler will generate an abstract class Foo to represent
this service. Foo will have an abstract method for each method defined in the
service definition. In this case, the method Bar is defined as:
abstract void bar(RpcController controller, FooRequest request,
RpcCallback<FooResponse> done);
The parameters are equivalent to the parameters of Service.CallMethod(),
except that the method argument is implied and request and done specify
their exact type.
Foo subclasses the Service interface. The protocol buffer compiler
automatically generates implementations of the methods of Service as follows:
getDescriptorForType: Returns the service’sServiceDescriptor.callMethod: Determines which method is being called based on the provided method descriptor and calls it directly, down-casting the request message and callback to the correct types.getRequestPrototypeandgetResponsePrototype: Returns the default instance of the request or response of the correct type for the given method.
The following static method is also generated:
static ServiceDescriptor getServiceDescriptor(): Returns the type’s descriptor, which contains information about what methods this service has and what their input and output types are.
Foo will also contain a nested interface Foo.Interface. This is a pure
interface that again contains methods corresponding to each method in your
service definition. However, this interface does not extend the Service
interface. This is a problem because RPC server implementations are usually
written to use abstract Service objects, not your particular service. To solve
this problem, if you have an object impl implementing Foo.Interface, you can
call Foo.newReflectiveService(impl) to construct an instance of Foo that
simply delegates to impl, and implements Service.
To recap, when implementing your own service, you have two options:
- Subclass
Fooand implement its methods as appropriate, then hand instances of your subclass directly to the RPC server implementation. This is usually easiest, but some consider it less “pure”. - Implement
Foo.Interfaceand useFoo.newReflectiveService(Foo.Interface)to construct aServicewrapping it, then pass the wrapper to your RPC implementation.
Stub
The protocol buffer compiler also generates a “stub” implementation of every
service interface, which is used by clients wishing to send requests to servers
implementing the service. For the Foo service (above), the stub implementation
Foo.Stub will be defined as a nested class.
Foo.Stub is a subclass of Foo which also implements the following methods:
Foo.Stub(RpcChannel channel): Constructs a new stub which sends requests on the given channel.RpcChannel getChannel(): Returns this stub’s channel, as passed to the constructor.
The stub additionally implements each of the service’s methods as a wrapper
around the channel. Calling one of the methods simply calls
channel.callMethod().
The Protocol Buffer library does not include an RPC implementation. However, it
includes all of the tools you need to hook up a generated service class to any
arbitrary RPC implementation of your choice. You need only provide
implementations of RpcChannel and RpcController.
Blocking Interfaces
The RPC classes described above all have non-blocking semantics: when you call a
method, you provide a callback object which will be invoked once the method
completes. Often it is easier (though possibly less scalable) to write code
using blocking semantics, where the method simply doesn’t return until it is
done. To accommodate this, the protocol buffer compiler also generates blocking
versions of your service class. Foo.BlockingInterface is equivalent to
Foo.Interface except that each method simply returns the result rather than
call a callback. So, for example, bar is defined as:
abstract FooResponse bar(RpcController controller, FooRequest request)
throws ServiceException;
Analogous to non-blocking services,
Foo.newReflectiveBlockingService(Foo.BlockingInterface) returns a
BlockingService wrapping some Foo.BlockingInterface. Finally,
Foo.BlockingStub returns a stub implementation of Foo.BlockingInterface that
sends requests to a particular BlockingRpcChannel.
Plugin Insertion Points
Code generator plugins that want to extend the output of the Java code generator may insert code of the following types using the given insertion point names.
outer_class_scope: Member declarations that belong in the file’s wrapper class.class_scope:TYPENAME: Member declarations that belong in a message class.TYPENAMEis the full proto name, e.g.package.MessageType.builder_scope:TYPENAME: Member declarations that belong in a message’s builder class.TYPENAMEis the full proto name, e.g.package.MessageType.enum_scope:TYPENAME: Member declarations that belong in an enum class.TYPENAMEis the full proto enum name, e.g.package.EnumType.message_implements:TYPENAME: Class implementation declarations for a message class.TYPENAMEis the full proto name, e.g.package.MessageType.builder_implements:TYPENAME: Class implementation declarations for a builder class.TYPENAMEis the full proto name, e.g.package.MessageType.
Generated code cannot contain import statements, as these are prone to conflict with type names defined within the generated code itself. Instead, when referring to an external class, you must always use its fully-qualified name.
The logic for determining output file names in the Java code generator is fairly
complicated. You should probably look at the protoc source code, particularly
java_headers.cc, to make sure you have covered all cases.
Do not generate code which relies on private class members declared by the standard code generator, as these implementation details may change in future versions of Protocol Buffers.
Utility Classes
Protocol buffer provides utility classes for message comparison, JSON conversion and working with well-known types (predefined protocol buffer messages for common use-cases).