📝 What is BDD?
Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) is a software development methodology that evolved from Test-Driven Development (TDD). Unlike traditional development approaches that focus on implementation details, BDD focuses on the behavior of the system from the user’s perspective.
BDD encourages collaboration between developers, QA, and non-technical stakeholders through a shared language that everyone can understand. This approach bridges the gap between technical and business teams by using natural language descriptions of requirements that can also serve as tests.
🚀 How BDD Differs from Other Approaches
| BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) | TDD (Test-Driven Development) | Traditional Development |
|---|---|---|
| Focuses on behaviors and outcomes | Focuses on code implementation and unit testing | Often focuses on features without explicit test criteria |
| Tests written in natural language | Tests written in programming language | Testing often done after development |
| Encourages collaboration between technical and non-technical team members | Primarily developer-focused | Often has communication gaps between teams |
| Examples and scenarios describe expected behavior | Tests verify code functions correctly | Requirements and tests often disconnected |
🌐 Alternatives to BDD
- Test-Driven Development (TDD): Write tests first, then implement code to pass those tests.
- Acceptance Test-Driven Development (ATDD): Similar to BDD but focuses more on specific acceptance criteria.
- Specification by Example: Uses concrete examples to illustrate requirements.
- Domain-Driven Design (DDD): Focuses on modeling complex domains in code (not a testing methodology).
🥒 What is Cucumber?
Cucumber is a popular tool that supports BDD. It allows you to write feature tests in Gherkin syntax (plain English) and then implement step definitions that connect those English phrases to actual code that tests your application.
Cucumber runs executable specifications written in plain text and produces reports indicating whether the software behaves according to the specification or not.
❓ Is Cucumber only for BDD?
While Cucumber was designed specifically to support BDD, it can be used in other contexts:
- As a general acceptance testing tool.
- For documentation purposes.
- For exploratory testing.
🌱 Alternatives to Cucumber
- SpecFlow: BDD tool for .NET.
- JBehave: Java-based BDD framework.
- Behave: Python BDD framework.
- Behat: PHP BDD framework.
- Robot Framework: Generic test automation framework that can support BDD-style testing.
💡 What is Gherkin?
Gherkin is the language format used in Cucumber to write feature files. It uses a simple set of keywords to structure tests in a way that’s readable by both humans and computers.
🔑 Key Gherkin Keywords
- Feature: Describes the feature being tested.
- Scenario: Describes a specific test case.
- Given: Sets up the initial context.
- When: Describes the action taken.
- Then: Describes the expected outcome.
- And/But: Used to chain multiple Given, When, or Then steps.
❓ Is Gherkin only for BDD?
Gherkin was designed for BDD but can be used in other contexts:
- As a documentation format.
- For creating user stories.
- For non-technical requirements documentation.
🌱 Gherkin Alternatives
- Markdown: Less structured but still readable.
- Custom DSLs: Domain-specific languages.
- YAML-based formats: Structured but less focused on behaviors.
- FitNesse wiki format: For acceptance testing.
🧑💻 Who Writes BDD Tests?
BDD tests ideally involve multiple roles:
- Product owners/business analysts: Help define scenarios and acceptance criteria.
- QA specialists: Refine scenarios and ensure testability.
- Developers: Implement step definitions and underlying test code.
The feature files (Gherkin) should be written collaboratively, while the technical implementation (step definitions) is typically handled by developers or QA automation engineers.
🚀 Should BDD Tests Be Part of the Main Project?
Yes, BDD tests should generally be part of the main project:
- They ensure tests evolve alongside the code.
- They make tests available to all developers.
- They allow CI/CD pipelines to run these tests.
However, they’re typically in a separate directory structure (e.g., src/test/resources/features/ in a Maven/Gradle project).
📌 Projects Suitable for BDD
- Projects with significant business logic.
- Applications with complex user interactions.
- Systems requiring close collaboration between technical and business stakeholders.
- Projects where requirements clarity is challenging.
🥒 BDD with Spring Boot Applications
BDD works very well with Spring Boot applications. Spring Boot’s testing capabilities integrate nicely with tools like Cucumber through libraries such as:
- cucumber-spring
- spring-boot-starter-test
⚡ BDD Tests vs. Unit Tests
| BDD Tests | Unit Tests |
|---|---|
| Focus on behavior and outcomes | Focus on implementation details |
| Written in natural language | Written in programming language |
| Test complete features | Test individual methods/classes |
| Typically slower to execute | Typically fast to execute |
| Better for detecting integration issues | Better for detecting code-level issues |
| Can serve as living documentation | Primarily for developers |
✅ Practical Example with Spring Boot
This has been added to: GitHub - BankingApp Cucumber BDD
🚀 Running Your BDD Tests
- Start by running the Cucumber test runner class:
CucumberRunnerTest.java. - Cucumber will find and parse the feature files.
- For each step in the scenario, Cucumber will find the matching step definition.
- The step definitions will execute the actual test code.
- Cucumber will report whether each scenario passed or failed.
🌟 Best Practices for BDD with Cucumber
- Keep scenarios focused: Each scenario should test one specific behavior.
- Use clear, business-oriented language.
- Reuse step definitions.
- Use scenario outlines for similar tests.
- Keep step definitions thin.
- Use tags for organization.
- Run as part of CI/CD.
Top comments (0)