DEV Community

Cover image for MVC vs MVP vs MVVM — Who’s the Real MVP?
Athreya aka Maneshwar
Athreya aka Maneshwar

Posted on

MVC vs MVP vs MVVM — Who’s the Real MVP?

You’ve probably seen these acronyms flying around in architecture talks, framework docs, or job interviews: MVC, MVP, and MVVM.

They’re not rival K-pop bands — they’re tried-and-tested design patterns that help you write clean, maintainable code by separating concerns between UI, data, and logic.

So, if you’ve ever looked at a messy spaghetti codebase and thought "This could use some structure", welcome.

Let’s untangle these patterns one by one, and see when and where each one fits.

MVC – Model View Controller

Imagine your app is a play. MVC is the classic trio:

  • Model is the script.
  • View is the stage.
  • Controller is the director telling actors what to do when the audience reacts.

Model

This is where your data and business logic live.

Think of it as the backend of your app’s brain — database interactions, validation rules, and calculations all go here.

View

The View is the dumb, pretty layer.

It only knows how to show stuff — like buttons, charts, or loading spinners. No brain here, just glam.

Controller

When you click a button or submit a form, the Controller takes the input, processes it (usually via the Model), and decides what View to show next.

It glues everything together.

In Web Dev:

  • Model = ORM / DB logic
  • View = HTML / Templates
  • Controller = Express.js, Django views, Rails controllers, etc.

In Android:

  • The Controller often ends up being the Activity or Fragment, which gets messy fast — leading to our next pattern.

MVP – Model View Presenter

MVP to the rescue.

MVP evolved from MVC, mostly to make unit testing easier and decouple your UI logic from the Android lifecycle.

Model

Same as MVC — it's your data layer.

View

Still dumb, but now even more hands-off.

It just exposes methods like showUserProfile() or displayError().

It doesn’t decide what to show — just how to render it.

Presenter

The real boss here.

Presenter grabs user input from the View, talks to the Model, and pushes the right data back to the View.

The beauty? View and Presenter talk via interfaces — so you can swap out the View during testing without breaking a sweat.

In Android MVP:

  • View = Activity/Fragment (dumbed down)
  • Presenter = A testable class with no Android imports
  • Model = Repo or data source classes

🧪 Why devs love MVP: Testing the Presenter is a breeze. Mock the View, and you’re good to go.

MVVM – Model View View Model

MVVM is the new-age cool kid, popularized by frameworks like Angular, React (kinda), Vue, and especially in Android with Jetpack libraries.

The key superpower here? Two-way data binding.

That means when your data changes, the UI updates automatically. And when users interact with the UI, the data layer updates in sync — without you manually pushing things around.

Model

Still your data/business logic — just like always.

View

Now even more passive.

Thanks to data binding, it doesn’t even need to call methods on the ViewModel.

It just reacts to data changes.

ViewModel

This is your middle layer.

It holds UI state and handles interaction logic.

Unlike Presenter, it doesn’t tell the View what to do directly — it exposes observable properties, and the View listens.

In Android MVVM:

  • View = Activity/Fragment using LiveData or StateFlow
  • ViewModel = ViewModel class managing UI state
  • Model = Repository pattern + Room/Retrofit/etc.

⚡ Bonus: You can reuse the same ViewModel across multiple Views — handy for shared components or screens.

Image description

TL;DR – Pick Your Pattern

Pattern View Logic Middle Layer Communication Testing Ease Data Binding
MVC In View + Controller Controller Tight coupling 😐 Meh
MVP View interface Presenter Interfaces ✅ Easy
MVVM View + Binding ViewModel Observables ✅ Easy ✅ Yes

When Should You Use What?

  • MVC: Okay for simple web apps or quick prototypes. Not great for scaling complexity.
  • MVP: Great for Android apps where you want testable, decoupled UI and logic.
  • MVVM: Ideal when your framework supports data binding or reactive programming. Think Angular, Vue, or Android with Jetpack Compose or XML binding.

Real Talk: Which One Do Devs Actually Use?

In the wild, you’ll see hybrids.
React devs use MVVM-ish logic with hooks and state management.
Vue and Angular lean toward MVVM.
Classic web apps? Still MVC or even MPA chaos.
And Android? MVP ruled for a while, but MVVM is now the go-to thanks to Jetpack ViewModel, LiveData, and Compose.

Final Words

Patterns aren’t rules — they’re guides. Use what fits your team, tooling, and sanity level. And if all else fails, ask yourself:

"Is my UI tightly coupled with logic? Can I test this independently? Do I cry every time I open this file?"

If the answers don’t make you smile — time to refactor.


I’ve been actively working on a super-convenient tool called LiveAPI.

LiveAPI helps you get all your backend APIs documented in a few minutes

With LiveAPI, you can quickly generate interactive API documentation that allows users to execute APIs directly from the browser.

Image description

If you’re tired of manually creating docs for your APIs, this tool might just make your life easier.

Top comments (0)