TanStack Start vs. Next.js: Choosing the right full-stack React framework

Written by Abiola Farounbi✏️

The React ecosystem is constantly evolving, with new libraries and frameworks pushing the boundaries of performance, flexibility, and developer experience.

For years, Next.js has been the go-to choice for building full-stack React applications, thanks to its server-first approach, built-in support for server-side rendering (SSR), static site generation (SSG), and intuitive file-based routing. But recently, new contenders have entered the scene, one of the most notable being TanStack Start.

Built by the team behind widely-used tools like TanStack Query, TanStack Router, and TanStack Table, this new framework offers a fresh take on full-stack React development. TanStack Start brings a fresh perspective to full-stack React development. It embraces a client-first architecture, yet still supports powerful capabilities like full-document server-side rendering (SSR), streaming, and server functions.

If you’re looking to move away from boilerplate-heavy workflows and want type-safe routing, smarter data fetching, and the flexibility to structure your app your way, TanStack Start might be exactly what you need.

In this article, we’ll explore a detailed comparison between TanStack Start and Next.js, breaking down their core architectures, routing strategies, data-fetching approaches, performance optimizations, and more. Whether you’re building a highly dynamic single-page app or a content-heavy website, understanding the strengths and trade-offs of each framework will help you make a more informed choice.

What sets them apart: A feature comparison

Every framework is shaped by a foundational set of features that define its architecture, development experience, and overall capabilities. To better understand what TanStack Start and Next.js offer, it helps to compare their core features side by side and highlight how they differ in philosophy and functionality.

Here’s a quick summary of the key differences between the two frameworks:

Core architecture

Next.js embraces a server-first architecture aimed at optimizing performance and delivering a seamless user experience. It emphasizes server-side rendering (SSR), static site generation (SSG), and incremental static regeneration (ISR), enabling full or partial pre-rendering of pages on the server.

This approach results in faster initial page loads, improved SEO, and smaller client-side bundles. With the introduction of the App Router, Next.js now incorporates React Server Components (RSC) and server actions, allowing developers to more efficiently blend client and server logic.

In contrast, TanStack Start takes a client-first approach, treating applications as single-page apps (SPAs) by default. This enables faster route transitions and rich client-side interactivity.

That said, it doesn't compromise on server-side capabilities, instead, it supports full-document SSR, streaming, and server functions powered by tools like Vite and Nitro. At the heart of TanStack Start’s architecture is TanStack Router, a fully type-safe, enterprise-grade routing system. While the client stays in control, developers can progressively opt into SSR and SSG as needed, making TanStack Start a highly flexible, modern full-stack solution.

Routing approaches

Next.js uses a file-system-based routing system. The structure of the pages or app directory directly maps to your application’s routes. For example, creating a file at pages/about.js automatically sets up a route at /about. Nested routes are created by organizing folders hierarchically; pages/blog/post.js corresponds to the /blog/post route.

This approach simplifies routing, especially for developers who prefer a convention-over-configuration paradigm. It eliminates the need for explicit route declarations and speeds up development.

However, in complex applications that require advanced dynamic routing or more customizable behavior, this system can become limiting. Because route definitions are tied to the file system, flexibility may suffer in highly dynamic use cases. TanStack Start, on the other hand, uses TanStack Router, a fully type-safe routing solution that supports both file-based and code-based routing, providing significantly more flexibility.

• In file-based routing, the behavior is similar to Next.js, allowing developers to define routes through the folder structure
• In code-based routing, routes are defined programmatically. This gives developers greater control over routing logic, enabling more advanced configurations. Routes are matched and composed into a component tree using a route tree model, conceptually similar to file-based routing, but with far more customizability

For example, using the createRoute function, you can define a route for the About page by specifying its path, parent route, and associated component, all in a clear, declarative way:

const aboutRoute = createRoute({
  getParentRoute: () => rootRoute,
  path: '/about',
  component: AboutComponent,
})

Data fetching technique

Next.js supports multiple data fetching strategies:

• getStaticProps — Fetches data at build time, generating static HTML pages. Ideal for content that doesn't change frequently, ensuring fast load times
• getServerSideProps — Fetches data on every request, ensuring that the page content is always fresh. Suitable for dynamic pages that need up-to-date data
• Dynamic interactions — Data can also be fetched on the client side using React Hooks like useEffect, or libraries like TanStack Query or SWR, which provide advanced features like caching, background updates, and revalidation. Check out this article on using TanStack Query with Next.js for a deeper dive

TanStack Start offers a flexible data loading strategy by combining isomorphic route loaders, seamless integration with TanStack Query, and server functions to streamline client-server interactions:

• Route loaders — Each route can define a loader function to fetch data before rendering. These loaders are isomorphic, meaning they execute on both the server and the client, ensuring consistent data hydration across environments
• Integrated caching with TanStack Query — Data fetched via loaders is automatically cached. TanStack Query handles features like background refetching, pagination, and optimistic updates, reducing boilerplate around state management. For advanced scenarios like real-time updates, TanStack Query supports WebSocket integration. Dive deeper into TanStack Query and WebSockets: Real-time React data fetching
• Server functions — TanStack Start introduces server functions that can be called directly from the client. This eliminates the need for a separate API layer, making client-server interactions more intuitive and streamlined

TypeScript support and developer experience

Next.js delivers a strong developer experience with features like fast refresh, built-in TypeScript support, and a rich ecosystem of plugins and hosting solutions. Local development is smooth, and project setup is streamlined using create-next-app. However, there are a few trade-offs:

• CLI scaffolding is limited
• Dynamic routes often require manual type assertions
• Data-loading methods lack strict type inference, which can lead to runtime errors if not carefully managed

TanStack Start, on the other hand, is built with a TypeScript-first philosophy. It emphasizes end-to-end type safety across routing, data loading, and server functions. The framework uses Vite for ultra-fast hot reloads and modern development workflows.

While it doesn’t yet offer direct CLI scaffolding, its type-safe router and data APIs help enforce a more maintainable, robust structure, making it an excellent choice for developers who prioritize precision, flexibility, and long-term stability.

Performance and bundle optimization

Next.js offers robust performance optimizations out of the box, including:

• Automatic per-page code-splitting
• Tree-shaking to remove unused code
• A built-in <Image /> component with support for AVIF, WebP, lazy loading, and on-the-fly compression

These features help reduce bundle size, improve page load times, and minimize the need for manual tuning, making it easy to ship production-ready apps with excellent performance. TanStack Start, in contrast, uses a Vite-powered architecture that enables manual but highly flexible code-splitting and tree-shaking. While it doesn’t include built-in image optimization, developers can easily integrate third-party tools or plugins.

Thanks to its lightweight core, support for full-document SSR, and streaming, TanStack Start is well-suited for applications where performance tuning and customization are top priorities. It gives developers full control over how and when optimizations are applied.

Build and deployment

Next.js offers a zero-config setup powered by Turbopack, enabling developers to dive straight into building without needing deep tooling adjustments. It supports deployment across traditional servers, serverless platforms, and edge environments, with seamless integrations for Vercel, Cloudflare Workers, and Netlify.

Its built-in optimizations make it ideal for rapid deployment and scalable infrastructure. TanStack Start takes a more configurable approach, leveraging Vite and Nitro to create a flexible, modern build pipeline. While it may require additional manual setup, it gives developers fine-grained control over performance and deployment.

Thanks to Nitro’s adapters, TanStack Start is compatible with edge, serverless, and traditional hosting environments, making it a strong fit for custom deployment workflows and advanced infrastructure needs.

Creating a basic project in TanStack Start vs. Next JS

Next.js offers a seamless setup experience via the create-next-app CLI. It enables developers to quickly scaffold a new project with built-in support for TypeScript, routing, and other core conventions. This makes it especially appealing for teams or individuals already familiar with React who want to get up and running with minimal configuration:

npx create-next-app@latest my-next-app --typescript
cd my-next-app  
npm run dev  

TanStack Start, on the other hand, is still in beta and currently does not offer a dedicated CLI tool for project setup. To get started, developers typically use the Quick Start approach by cloning an example project from the official TanStack Router repository:

npx gitpick TanStack/router/tree/main/examples/react/start-basic start-basic
cd start-basic
npm install
npm run dev

Note: gitpick is an official tool that lets you clone only a specific folder from a GitHub repo. Alternatively, you can set up a TanStack Start project from scratch, which involves a more hands-on approach and gives full control for customization. For a detailed, step-by-step guide on this process, refer to the introduction to the TanStack Start framework article.

Should you choose TanStack Start or Next JS?

Both frameworks have their unique advantage over the other and must be considered before deciding to use them. In this section, we will explore key criteria to help you decide which option best aligns with your project needs.

Project scope and complexity

Next.js is often preferred in building large-scale applications, e-commerce sites, marketing websites, and projects where SEO is paramount. Its established ecosystem and comprehensive features make it a reliable choice for a wide range of complexities that may arise during development. TanStack Start can be found useful in building data-intensive dashboards and applications requiring rich client-side interactivity.

Its flexibility and type safety make it ideal for complex projects that demand customization. Also, if your application uses other TanStack libraries like TanStack Query, Router, Table, and Form, using Start for building the application would offer a very cohesive experience. For a deep dive into TanStack Table specifically, check out this guide.

Team proficiency

Next.js offers an easy learning curve due to its extensive documentation and community support. Teams already familiar with Next.js can easily adapt to any latest changes and development on the framework. TanStack Start, still in its beta phase, may present a steeper learning curve and require more experimentation due to its unique architectural approach. Teams that are already comfortable with TypeScript and looking for a client-first approach will gain from its features along the way.

Long-term scalability

Next.js has shown a proven track record of scaling large applications. Its tight integration with Vercel's ecosystem offers extensive built-in optimizations, making it a stable choice for long-term projects.

Also, the introduction of React Server Components aims to further improve scalability by optimizing server workloads and client bundle sizes TanStack Start offers a flexible architecture, enabling developers to implement server-side logic in a customizable way while minimizing dependence on a specific framework. Its emphasis on developer freedom in choosing patterns makes it suitable for projects that may evolve.

Optimal use cases

Next.js is ideal for content-rich websites, e-commerce platforms, and enterprise applications that benefit from built-in rendering strategies like SSG/SSR/ISR and seamless deployment on Vercel. Its rich feature set and edge-ready infrastructure make it a dependable choice for large-scale, SEO-focused projects.

TanStack Start is found to be more useful in highly interactive, data-driven applications such as dashboards and internal tools. It’s especially suited for teams that value strong type safety, prefer granular control over their stack, and are already invested in the TanStack ecosystem (Query, Table, Router, Form) for a cohesive and composable development experience.

Migration considerations

If you have an existing Next.js project and are considering TanStack Start, it would likely be a significant rewrite rather than a simple migration. This is due to fundamental differences in routing, data fetching techniques, and overall project structure. However, if your Next.js project already heavily uses TanStack Query for data fetching and a separate client-side router, the transition for those specific parts might be smoother.

Final thoughts

Both TanStack Start and Next.js are robust, feature-rich frameworks for building full-stack React applications, each with its own strengths. Your choice ultimately depends on your project’s specific needs, your team’s familiarity with the tools, and your long-term goals.

Whether you're drawn to Next.js's mature ecosystem and zero-config deployment or TanStack Start's type-safe flexibility and client-first architecture, this guide gives you a solid foundation to explore both frameworks, evaluate their features, and confidently choose the one that best fits your development workflow. I hope this article was helpful! If you have any questions or thoughts, feel free to reach out to me on X. Happy coding!

Get set up with LogRocket's modern React error tracking in minutes:

1. Visit https://logrocket.com/signup/ to get an app ID.
2. Install LogRocket via NPM or script tag. LogRocket.init() must be called client-side, not server-side.

NPM:

$ npm i --save logrocket 

// Code:

import LogRocket from 'logrocket'; 
LogRocket.init('app/id');

Script Tag:

Add to your HTML:

<script src="https://cdn.lr-ingest.com/LogRocket.min.js"></script>
<script>window.LogRocket && window.LogRocket.init('app/id');</script>

3.(Optional) Install plugins for deeper integrations with your stack:

• Redux middleware
• ngrx middleware
• Vuex plugin

Get started now.