DEV Community

Cover image for No-Code Monetization: Why B2B Products Are Turning to Broker Models in 2025
Kaan Kaya
Kaan Kaya

Posted on

No-Code Monetization: Why B2B Products Are Turning to Broker Models in 2025

Hey devs 👨‍💻

I just read a post on CMC that really nailed something I’ve been noticing in my own work: broker models are no longer optional for Web3 infra — they’re the new default.

A few years ago, exchanges were just backend pipes for liquidity. Today, they’re go-to-market tools, monetization channels, and sometimes the biggest user acquisition engine you’ll ever plug into. That’s a massive shift for those of us shipping wallets, terminals, or anything API-driven.

The WhiteBIT case in the article stood out. Their broker model doesn’t just offer API keys and walk away. It gives:

  • Up to 40% revenue share (that’s real money for bootstrapped teams),
  • Custom terms for different product types (finally, someone who gets that a wallet ≠ a DEX ≠ a terminal),
  • Co-marketing and even user tournaments (which can be more effective than paid ads, tbh),
  • Plus: fast onboarding and solid support — which makes a huge difference when you’re on a tight dev cycle.

What hit home most?
Broker models aren’t just monetization. They’re distribution. They’re analytics. They’re community. If you're building multi-exchange logic or even a simple price-alert tool, this stuff belongs in your architecture from day one.

The article also breaks down the Atani x Kraken use case. Worth reading — it shows how good UX, embedded trading, and real-time commission logic actually improve LTV and retention. Something I’ve seen in my own builds too.

Anyway, just thought I’d share. If you're building infra and haven't thought about embedded exchange layers or broker monetization, now’s the time.

Here’s the article that sparked all this:
🔗 [https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/685055b7d74df408843e9be4/]

Let me know your take 🧠

Top comments (0)