DEV Community

Harit Joshi
Harit Joshi

Posted on

SSR vs CSR vs SSG vs ISR in Next.js: Choosing the Right Rendering Strategy

#webdev #nextjs #react #ssr

As a developer working with Next.js, you're likely no stranger to the various rendering strategies available in this popular React framework. But have you ever wondered which one to choose for your project, and why? In this article, we'll delve into the world of Server-Side Rendering (SSR), Client-Side Rendering (CSR), Static Site Generation (SSG), and Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR) in Next.js. By the end, you'll be equipped with the knowledge to make informed decisions about the best rendering strategy for your application.

Prerequisites

Before diving into this article, it's assumed you have a basic understanding of Next.js, React, and JavaScript. Familiarity with HTML and CSS is also helpful. If you're new to Next.js, we recommend starting with the official documentation.

If you're already familiar with Next.js, you might want to brush up on the following topics:

The Four Rendering Strategies in Next.js

Next.js offers four main rendering strategies: SSR, CSR, SSG, and ISR. Each has its strengths and weaknesses, and the right choice depends on your application's specific needs.

1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR)

Server-Side Rendering involves rendering the initial HTML on the server, then sending it to the client for rendering. This approach provides:

  • Faster page loads: Since the server generates the initial HTML, the client receives a complete page, reducing the time it takes for the user to see content.
  • Better SEO: Search engines can crawl and index server-rendered pages more easily, improving your application's visibility.
  • Dynamic data: SSR allows for dynamic data fetching on the server, enabling the use of server-side APIs and databases.

However, SSR also has some drawbacks:

  • Increased server load: With SSR, the server must handle every request, which can lead to increased load and potential performance issues.
  • Higher latency: Since the server must generate the HTML, there's a slight delay before the client receives the page.

Example Code

Here's an example of using getServerSideProps to fetch data on the server:

import { GetServerSideProps } from 'next';

const HomePage = () => {
  // Render component here
};

export const getServerSideProps: GetServerSideProps = async (context) => {
  const data = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
  return {
    props: {
      data: await data.json(),
    },
  };
};

export default HomePage;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

2. Client-Side Rendering (CSR)

Client-Side Rendering involves rendering the initial HTML on the client (usually the browser), using JavaScript to fetch and render data. This approach provides:

  • Faster application load: CSR allows for faster application load times, as the client only needs to fetch JavaScript and HTML files.
  • Dynamic data: CSR enables dynamic data fetching and rendering on the client-side.
  • Improved user experience: CSR can provide a more interactive and responsive user experience.

However, CSR also has some drawbacks:

  • Delayed page loads: CSR can lead to delayed page loads, as the client must fetch and render data after receiving the initial HTML.
  • Poor SEO: CSR can make it more difficult for search engines to crawl and index pages, as the initial HTML may not contain the final content.

Example Code

Here's an example of using useState and useEffect to fetch data on the client:

import { useState, useEffect } from 'react';

const HomePage = () => {
  const [data, setData] = useState(null);

  useEffect(() => {
    const fetchData = async () => {
      const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
      const data = await response.json();
      setData(data);
    };
    fetchData();
  }, []);

  // Render component here
  return <div>Hello World!</div>;
};

export default HomePage;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

3. Static Site Generation (SSG)

Static Site Generation involves generating the HTML and static assets for a website at build time, rather than at runtime. This approach provides:

  • Fast page loads: SSG enables fast page loads, as the client only needs to fetch pre-generated static files.
  • Improved SEO: SSG can improve SEO, as the generated HTML contains all the necessary content for search engines to crawl and index.
  • Reduced server load: With SSG, the server only needs to serve static files, reducing the load and potential performance issues.

However, SSG also has some drawbacks:

  • Limited dynamic data: SSG makes it difficult to incorporate dynamic data, as the HTML is generated at build time.
  • Re-deployment required: Changes to the application require re-deployment, which can be time-consuming.

Example Code

Here's an example of using getStaticProps to pre-generate HTML at build time:

import { GetStaticProps } from 'next';

const HomePage = ({ data }) => {
  // Render component here
  return <div>Hello World!</div>;
};

export const getStaticProps: GetStaticProps = async () => {
  const data = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
  return {
    props: {
      data: await data.json(),
    },
  };
};

export default HomePage;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

4. Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR)

Incremental Static Regeneration involves re-generating static files after the initial build, using a cache to store the generated HTML. This approach provides:

  • Improved performance: ISR enables fast page loads, as the client can fetch pre-generated static files.
  • Reduced server load: With ISR, the server only needs to re-generate static files when changes occur, reducing the load and potential performance issues.
  • Dynamic data: ISR allows for dynamic data fetching and re-generation of static files.

However, ISR also has some drawbacks:

  • Additional complexity: ISR adds an extra layer of complexity, as the application must manage the cache and re-generation of static files.

Example Code

Here's an example of using getStaticProps with ISR to re-generate static files:

import { GetStaticProps } from 'next';

const HomePage = ({ data }) => {
  // Render component here
  return <div>Hello World!</div>;
};

export const getStaticProps: GetStaticProps = async () => {
  const data = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
  return {
    props: {
      data: await data.json(),
    },
    revalidate: 60, // Re-generate static file every 60 seconds
  };
};

export default HomePage;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Choosing the Right Rendering Strategy

When choosing a rendering strategy for your Next.js application, consider the following factors:

  • Page load time: If fast page loads are crucial, consider using SSR or SSG.
  • Dynamic data: If your application requires dynamic data fetching, consider using CSR or SSR.
  • SEO: If SEO is important, consider using SSR or SSG.
  • Server load: If your application experiences high server load, consider using SSG or ISR.

Ultimately, the right rendering strategy depends on your application's specific needs and requirements.

Conclusion

In this article, we explored the four rendering strategies available in Next.js: SSR, CSR, SSG, and ISR. Each strategy has its strengths and weaknesses, and the right choice depends on your application's specific needs.

By understanding the differences between these rendering strategies, you can make informed decisions about how to build and deploy your Next.js application.

As a reminder, Cloudzilla empowers indie developers and small teams by providing a range of tools and services for building and deploying applications. Whether you're using Next.js or another framework, our suite of products can help you bring your ideas to life.

We hope this article has been helpful in your development journey. Happy coding!

Top comments (0)