DEV Community

davinceleecode
davinceleecode Subscriber

Posted on • Edited on

πŸ” Understanding Clustered vs Non-Clustered Indexes in SQL Server

πŸ“Œ What Are Indexes?

Indexes help SQL Server quickly find rows in a table, just like an index in a book. There are two main types:

  • Clustered Index: Sorts and stores the data rows physically in the table in order. Only one allowed per table.
  • Non-Clustered Index: Separate structure with pointers to the actual rows. You can create many of these.

βœ… Primary Key and Index Relationship

By default:

  • When you create a Primary Key (PK), SQL Server automatically makes it a Clustered Index β€” unless one already exists.

You can override this:

CREATE TABLE MyTable (
    ID INT NOT NULL,
    Name NVARCHAR(100),
    CONSTRAINT PK_MyTable PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED (ID)
);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
  • Then create a clustered index on another column CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX IX_MyTable_Name ON MyTable(Name);

πŸ€” Why Switch the Clustered Index?

The Primary Key (e.g., ID) is often just an internal identifier. You may get better performance by making a different column clustered, especially if you frequently search or sort by it.


πŸ’‘ Benefits of Customizing the Clustered Index

  1. βœ… Faster Queries on Frequently Filtered Columns
    If you filter or sort often by a column like Status or CreatedDate, making that column clustered speeds up:

    • WHERE clauses
    • ORDER BY
    • GROUP BY
    • BETWEEN queries
  2. βœ… More Relevant Indexing
    If your queries rarely use the ID, there’s little benefit in clustering on it. Better to cluster on columns that match your query patterns.

  3. βœ… Avoid Key Lookups
    If your clustered index includes data frequently accessed with other columns, you can avoid expensive Key Lookup operations from non-clustered indexes.


⚠️ When Not to Switch
Stick with a clustered PK if:

  • You frequently join/filter by the PK
  • Your table is small or not accessed often
  • Your queries already perform well

❌ Disadvantages of Too Many Non-Clustered Indexes

1. πŸ”„ Slower Write Operations

  • Every time you INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE, SQL Server must update all relevant non-clustered indexes.
  • More indexes = more overhead = slower writes.

Example: If you update a column that appears in 5 non-clustered indexes, all 5 must be adjusted.

2. πŸ’Ύ Increased Storage Usage

  • Each non-clustered index is a separate data structure stored on disk.
  • More indexes = more storage, especially on large tables.

3. 🧠 More Work for the Query Optimizer

  • SQL Server has to evaluate all indexes to decide which one to use.
  • More indexes can make query planning more complex and sometimes lead to suboptimal plans.

4. πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ Index Fragmentation

  • Non-clustered indexes can become fragmented over time, especially with frequent inserts/updates.
  • This can slow down reads and require regular maintenance (e.g., REBUILD or REORGANIZE).

5. 🎯 Redundant or Unused Indexes

  • Developers sometimes add indexes "just in case", but if they're rarely used, they still add cost.
  • You should monitor usage with tools like:
SELECT * 
FROM sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats
WHERE database_id = DB_ID();
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

βœ… Best Practices

  • Create indexes based on actual query patterns.
  • Use the Database Engine Tuning Advisor or Query Store to identify missing or unused indexes.
  • Consider covering indexes (with INCLUDE) instead of creating new ones for every case.
  • Regularly review and drop unused indexes.

Summary

Scenario Best Clustered Index Choice
Mostly filter by ID (PK) Clustered PK
Often filter by Status or Date Clustered on that column
Large table with range queries Clustered index on queried column
Need multiple lookups Combine clustered + non-clustered with INCLUDE

If you found this helpful, consider supporting my work at β˜• Buy Me a Coffee.

Top comments (0)