Question
How can I create a List<Double> in Java that shares the same memory as a double[] array?
// The code snippet for creating a List<Double> from a double[] array is shown below:
double[] array = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0};
List<Double> list = new AbstractList<Double>() {
@Override
public Double get(int index) {
return array[index];
}
@Override
public int size() {
return array.length;
}
};
Answer
In Java, while the standard List implementation (like ArrayList) does not directly share memory with an array, you can create a custom implementation of a List that leverages a double[] array for memory efficiency. This is particularly useful in scenarios where you want to work with primitives but need the flexibility of a List interface.
// Custom List implementation sample
double[] array = {1.0, 2.0, 3.0};
List<Double> list = new AbstractList<Double>() {
@Override
public Double get(int index) {
return array[index]; // Retrieve from double[]
}
@Override
public int size() {
return array.length; // Return size from double[]
}
};
Causes
- Java's List interface does not directly support primitive types, necessitating boxing and unboxing with Double and List<Double>.
- Memory overhead from creating a new List implementation, as it would typically create objects for each element.
Solutions
- Implement a custom List that extends AbstractList and overrides the necessary methods to delegate to the underlying double[] array.
- Use a library such as Eclipse Collections or Apache Commons that provides specialized collections for primitive types.
Common Mistakes
Mistake: Not handling index out-of-bounds for the List implementation.
Solution: Always ensure to check the index within the bounds of the double[] array.
Mistake: Boxing and unboxing can lead to performance degradation.
Solution: Use a custom implementation that avoids boxing whenever possible.
Helpers
- Java List<Double>
- double array in Java
- custom list implementation Java
- memory-efficient List in Java