Question
What is the C++ equivalent of using <T extends Class> for parameter and return types in Java?
// Java example with T extends Class
class A<T extends Number> {
T value;
A(T value) { this.value = value; }
T getValue() { return value; }
} // Usage: new A<>(5);
Answer
In Java, the syntax <T extends Class> is part of generics, allowing you to specify that a type parameter T must be a subtype of Class. C++ does not have a direct equivalent but achieves similar behavior through templates and type constraints, particularly with type traits and concepts in C++20.
// C++ template example with type constraints
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
concept IsNumber = std::is_arithmetic_v<T>;
template <IsNumber T>
class A {
private:
T value;
public:
A(T value) : value(value) {}
T getValue() { return value; }
};
// Usage: A<int> a(5); or A<double> b(5.0);
Causes
- Java's generics provide type safety at compile-time by restricting the type parameters to subclasses of a specific class.
- C++ templates offer flexibility and can perform checks at compile-time but lack direct constraints on types until the introduction of concepts.
Solutions
- Use C++ templates with static assertions to constrain types.
- In C++20, use concepts to enforce type constraints directly in template parameters.
Common Mistakes
Mistake: Confusing template specialization with type constraints.
Solution: Use C++ concepts to clarify constraints and avoid specializations that may lead to runtime errors.
Mistake: Neglecting to include the appropriate headers for type traits.
Solution: Always include <type_traits> when using concepts or type traits in C++.
Helpers
- C++ generics
- C++ templates
- Java generics
- C++ concepts
- C++ type traits
- C++ class constraints