Timeline for Nullable<T> Implementation for VB6/VBA
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Feb 14, 2014 at 14:25 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon |
hmm... so all this class is buying me is really a HasValue member... which IsEmpty already addresses, the VB6-way... Right? Basically a Nullabe<T>/Emptyable<T> has little use in VB6 then, since any value type can already be assigned to Empty!
|
|
| Feb 14, 2014 at 3:01 | vote | accept | Mathieu Guindon | ||
| Feb 14, 2014 at 3:01 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | Building on your answer I added my own, feel free to comment ;) and PS - feel free to join us (CR regulars) anytime in The 2nd Monitor! | |
| Feb 14, 2014 at 2:26 | comment | added | Comintern | It's where I cut my teeth in programming. I'll take a look at it tonight. You can do some wild stuff with VB6 like in-line assembly and opening files as memory mapped arrays. The wheels really came off when they introduced AddressOf, it lets you break out of the walls of the runtime. | |
| Feb 14, 2014 at 2:21 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon |
You seem to know your VB6.. I'd be curious to read your input on my List<T> class :)
|
|
| Feb 14, 2014 at 2:20 | history | edited | Comintern | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add link.
|
| Feb 14, 2014 at 2:16 | comment | added | Comintern | More accurate to say that .NET "uncorrupted" VB6. | |
| Feb 14, 2014 at 2:15 | comment | added | Mathieu Guindon | +1 I was just coming to the same conclusions! Wow I did miss the memo... or .NET has successfully "corrupted" my VB6 mind! | |
| Feb 14, 2014 at 2:10 | history | answered | Comintern | CC BY-SA 3.0 |